You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
GM General Model View, Market Share & Profit News ![]()

2415 messages, Last post on Feb 12, 2007 at 4:41 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: louiswei (Jan 19, 2007 6:24 am) BTW, the "soft plastics" in 90s Camrys and accords would definitely not cut it today. Hondas especially had plenty of hard surfaces inside before recent models. |
|
|
Replying to: 1487 (Jan 19, 2007 6:11 am) Yeah but what does comparable V8s like BMW 5-series, MB E-class and Caddy STS get? The whole selling point for the GS400h is to get V8 power with V6 FE. To me I think that's a job well done for Lexus.
|
|
|
Replying to: 1487 (Jan 19, 2007 6:31 am) WRONG. I am actually pretty disappointed at Honda Accord after the 97' MY. Honda IMO took a step back by managed to utilize more hard plastic in the 98' Accord then its predecessor.
|
|
|
Replying to: 1487 (Jan 19, 2007 6:25 am) What's the auto mag's job? Is it to care about the domestic auto industry or report like the way it is? If the editors think the domestic entries are inferior to the imports what do you want him/her to do? Lie just because we should support domestic auto industry? If the domestics are truly on par with the imports or even exceed it why would any American with a common sense not want to support it? I just don't get it with all this media conspiracy theory. Before you point a figer at someone remember that there are 3 pointing at YOU.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: 1487 (Jan 19, 2007 6:25 am) CR just had to "withdraw" their babyseat evaluation. Seems they made drastic mistakes. Hmmmmmm.
|
|
|
Replying to: louiswei (Jan 19, 2007 6:47 am) CD just did a comparison test, and I guess they're in on the conspiracy too. They didn't like the Aura's interior. However, I guess they forgot to get the memo on "Toyota Love" as the Aura placed better than the 2007 Camry, and CD complained bitterly about the poor quality of the Camry interior. It seems that article isn't online yet, but they did have a Aura review back in Oct 06. Here's what they said: Once inside, we noticed our enthusiasm fade. It's not a bad interior, in fact compared with previous Saturn models the Aura benefits from nicer materials and better fit and finish, bar none. But it still doesn't stand up against the best interiors in the class, like the Toyota Camry*, Honda Accord, and Kia Optima. Aura XE Review *Note that this was before the comparo where they panned the 2007 Camry. By the way the KIA Optima finished higher than either the Camry or the Aura.
|
|
|
Replying to: lokki (Jan 19, 2007 7:41 am) BTW, since you are a firm believer in auto mag results I would like to note the CTS beat the 530, E320, S80 and A6 in a comparison in R&T magazine. Does that mean that the CTS is absolutely superior to those cars in your mind? I doubt it. At least R&T thoroughly explains their test results and doesnt give away 1st place to the car with the softest plastics. The Optima has a nice interior. It's bland but I would get it long before I let Honda or Toyota take my money. |
|
|
Replying to: louiswei (Jan 19, 2007 6:35 am) |
|
|
Was a Chevy Chevette. It was turd-brown (but so were a lot of cars back then, so I don't blame GM). I had electrical issues with it, including consistent problems with heat/blower that just couldn't be turned off. VERY nice in the midwestern summertime. It wasn't THE worst car I've ever owned, but close (that honor goes to mon ami, Le Baron de Chrysler). The 'vette finally just died, and no attempt at resuscitation was made.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kirstie_h (Jan 19, 2007 9:15 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
GM General Model View, Market Share & Profit News ![]()
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats