Sign In Join 



Toyota Matrix Handling & Suspension Questions

13 messages,  Last post on Aug 12, 2009 at 12:49 PM

You are in the Toyota Matrix Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Toyota Matrix, Steering, Suspension, Wagon


Messages Page 2 of 2
1
2
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6 of 13
Bumpy Ride by spinner31
Feb 26, 2007 (5:02 am)
Reply
I am new to Toyotas and to the Matrix. I recently purchased a 2005 Matrix with 27,000 miles. The handling on side roads seems rough. The car jars and seems to take in every bump. It's a pretty rough ride overall. The tires are new Goodyear Triple Treds. Is the bumpy handling a characteristic of the Matrix? Or the tires? Other suggestions? Thanks.
#7 of 13
spinner by nippononly
Feb 26, 2007 (12:58 pm)
Reply
What car are you coming out of? Sometimes observations on the quality of the ride are directly related to the last car you owned if you have recently traded. This car is no Buick, nor is it a large or heavy vehicle relatively speaking. Heavy vehicles often end up having a more settled ride (and worse handling and fuel economy) because of their weight. The Matrix is designed to be "sporty", a compromise between ride quality and cornering ability, which it strikes pretty well for my tastes, but everyone's tastes will vary.
 
It's funny, I was just reading the posts above that occured ages ago. The guy saying his mpg was real low has driven only 8000 miles in 2-1/4 years. That's so little driving it's no wonder his mpg stinks.
 
And tires do go down a bit in the normal course of things. Generally, you might lose 1 pound a month or a bit more just from driving around. That's part of the reason why it's a good idea to check them at least once a month. I think the manual recommends it at every fill-up, a rigorous schedule I am guilty of not following to the letter.
 
As for not tracking straight on the highway, I have not had a problem, but also it is sometimes the case that a certain brand of tire will follow the grooves in the pavement more than others. That applies on concrete, not asphalt, of course.
#8 of 13
Re: spinner [nippononly] by spinner31
Feb 26, 2007 (4:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Feb 26, 2007 12:58 pm)

I've had a 91 Honda Civic hatchback so I'm used to small cars.
#9 of 13
Re: spinner [spinner31] by nippononly
Feb 27, 2007 (9:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: spinner31 (Feb 26, 2007 4:54 pm)

Oh, well as someone who has had several of the older Civic hatches and loved them all, I will say the Matrix is significantly more stiff-legged than those models in stock form.
#10 of 13
stiff ride by nagatahawk
Dec 26, 2007 (9:02 am)
Reply
I have an '05 XRS and it rides a little stiff, because of the low profile 17" yokohamas.
but I like my cars stiff. the rear end feels a little light and starts to slide on hard turns.
#11 of 13
Re: 06 XR Handling [jcnader] by jonlemke1
Jan 06, 2009 (12:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jcnader (Apr 03, 2006 7:35 am)

I am also a 2005 matrix owner with the same complaint. I should have test drove the car more. It is really bad when driving highways with significant road ruts. My opinion is that this condition is a combination of the wide low profile very hard tires, short stiff travel in the suspension, and steering components that were designed to promote tight handling. The wide low profile tires do not have any ability to flex side to side to absorb road anomalies like traditional higher profile tires. Lacking this they tend to ride along one side of the tire when the road is not pristine. This uneven pressure gets transmitted via the steering components, and is felt as a pull in the steering wheel. In road ruts this is really bad as the front and back tires can start an oscillation of riding up and down the ruts which puts the vehicle in an uncomfortable sideways condition requiring plenty of steering input. This whole problem began when someone in design thought the low profile wide tires looked cool. They do offer some high performance corning capability, larger break components, and possibly a bit better gas mileage, but that costs you in the ride. Not to mention they cost nearly twice as much as traditional tires. I also have a 22 year old Camry with conventional tires that rides much better on the same highways.
#12 of 13
Poor handling in snow by Sportsmama457
Jan 12, 2009 (4:45 pm)
Reply
I have a 2004 Matrix that I bought used 3 years ago. This winter, when driving on unplowed or poorly plowed snowy roads, the back end of the car feels like it is weaving back and forth. This can be felt by everyone in the car, not just the driver. I keep expecting the car to do a 360. I just replaced the rear tires. Any ideas?
#13 of 13
Tires and Bumpy Ride by rfin16
Aug 12, 2009 (12:49 pm)
Reply
Has anyone had experience in switching from the low profile to more conventional tires? Does this decrease the roughness or stiffness of the ride? We have just acquired a used 2004 and find that with the low profile tires it is much more sensitive to rough roads (common in our area) compared to our 1998 tercel with small conventional tires.
 
Thanks for letting me know.

Messages Page 2 of 2
1
2
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement