Sign In Join 



Lexus LS 600h

348 messages,  Last post on Dec 30, 2008 at 10:12 AM

You are in the Future Vehicles Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h

What is this discussion about? Lexus LS 600h, Hybrid Cars, Sedan


Messages Page 31 of 35
1
...
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#299 of 348
Re: Lexus delays flagship hybrid sedan - autoweek [dc661] by tagman
Apr 30, 2007 (8:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: dc661 (Apr 30, 2007 7:30 am)

Lexus expects to sell about 2,000 units of the LS 600h L annually. Already, 1,650 orders are in hand.
 
Some of them will go the wayside, as with any new car's early orders. Perhaps the demand won't be as large as expected.
 
"This is the most sophisticated vehicle the company has ever produced and, of course, very limited volume," Michels said. "For this reason, our routine final production quality checks are even more rigorous than usual."
 
Could be a glitch? ... being kept confidential, but needs to be ironed out.
 
TagMan
#300 of 348
Re: I'm back [ljflx] by cyclone4
Apr 30, 2007 (9:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: ljflx (Apr 30, 2007 6:25 am)

Len,
 
I think that the main reason for the reduced trunk space with the LS460L is due to the reclining back seats but I could be wrong here.
 
When the LS600HL was first announced about 2 years ago, I distinctly remember everybody talking about gas mileage somewhere in the 30s in the city and upper 20s on the highway. One reason for this talk was due to the fact that the RX400H was rated at 31/27. The thinking was that the technology would be even more advanced by the time the LS600HL would be ready for production and that if anything it would get better mileage than the RX400H. I think this is the major reason for my disappointment.
 
I have actually given the S550 some thought. However, I don't want to deal with the reliability issue. I friend of mine got one about 4 months ago, and it has already had an unscheduled service call. Also, I do not hear good things about that "all everything control" (whatever you call it).
#301 of 348
Re: I'm back [cyclone4] by ljflx
Apr 30, 2007 (10:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: cyclone4 (Apr 30, 2007 9:49 am)

Command system - yes a total turnoff. My wife hated it and I couldn't find one reason why it was needed on the car. I know two folks that have the S550. One is problem free the other has had electronic issues.
#302 of 348
Re: I'm back [ljflx] by tagman
Apr 30, 2007 (11:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: ljflx (Apr 30, 2007 10:26 am)

Command system - yes a total turnoff. My wife hated it and I couldn't find one reason why it was needed on the car. I know two folks that have the S550. One is problem free the other has had electronic issues.
 
That's interesting - When I tested the S550, I could realize the initial intimidation factor of the COMAND system, however, after spending a little more time with it, it revealed itself to have a fairly logical and user-friendly G.U.I. (unlike i-Drive's reputation). I believe that it just takes a reasonable learning curve to get over the initial hump, which seems fairly typical nowadays with most electronic devices... such as cell phones, PDAs, and the like.
 
I have not heard of reliability issues with the latest S-Class at this time. I am, of course, disappointed to learn that you have heard of some. But, frankly, it comes as no shock.
 
The ergonomics of the LS are quite logical from my point of view, but they are more traditional, where there are the expected buttons and knobs and most buttons/knobs have their usual place. Instead of a central control system like the S550, the general interaction of the driver in the LS is to reach for the appropriate knob or switch, which certainly works fine, but isn't as modern, IMO. Some controls have centralized to the navigation screen, however, which is good, IMO.
 
With regards to reliability... I wonder if the typical S550 would really spend enough time in the shop to actually dent the owner experience, but if only the best in reliability will do... well... you know who is tops in THAT department! And credit goes where credit is deserved.
 
TagMan
#303 of 348
Re: I'm back [tagman] by ljflx
Apr 30, 2007 (3:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Apr 30, 2007 11:20 am)

1 of 2 is not much of a sample. The problem around my area is the 2000 S class and the 2003 update and there relibility woes turned off folks that had S-class cars previously and Lexus was in the right spot at the right time with the LWB offering. One guy I know well said if Lexus had stayed SWB he'd have stayed MB or tried Audi. Like me he sees little diff in the S550 and LS460L and like me he's looking high lux in this class and the sportier offerings from Audi and BMW don't interest him. Not in this class at least though the A8 styling and interior was something that attracted him there. The 5 series or lower is a different story with that guy as there he's shopping sport though his other car is the Acura MDX at the moment.
#304 of 348
Re: I'm back [cyclone4] by ljflx
Apr 30, 2007 (6:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cyclone4 (Apr 30, 2007 9:49 am)

I think that the main reason for the reduced trunk space with the LS460L is due to the reclining back seats but I could be wrong here.
 
Charlie - I think you are right about this. The bottom line is adding that gizmo might be good for the limo crowd but it doesn't serve the family crowd well.
 
I was at the dealership today to return my 2004 car. They finally had an LS460L on display and the rear seat room is certainly very impressive on the car. I did notice that someone who had posted that the memory seating is missing from the passenger side is dead on. The specs at Lexus.com say it's there but the car only has it on the driver side. I'll ask my sales guy about that tomorrow. It's hardly an important feature for me but it should be there. The car on display was white and it looked very nice in that color. But flint mica and black are the colors I love the car in.
 
I did ask about the smaller trunk because of the rear seat stuff and to my surprise no one cares about the trunk being smaller. That was according to my salesman and the dealership GM and there's still a shortage of LWB cars here. So I started talking to a guy at my sales guy's desk (while he was away with my papers on the the 2004 return). He had just taken an L with the rear seat options and he couldn't care less about the smaller trunk! Maybe it's us that are crazy??
#305 of 348
Re: I'm back [ljflx] by gagrice
May 01, 2007 (8:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: ljflx (Apr 30, 2007 6:36 pm)

Maybe the criteria for most buyers is room for golf clubs. It seems like a vehicle that would look best at a country club. I know I would never drive and park it at the mall.
#306 of 348
Re: I'm back [ljflx] by cyclone4
May 01, 2007 (10:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: ljflx (Apr 30, 2007 6:36 pm)

We could very well be "nut cases" concerning the trunk. But I want to be a happy "nut case" .
#307 of 348
Re: I'm back [gagrice] by pat HOST
May 01, 2007 (12:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (May 01, 2007 8:27 am)

Actually, I see concern for room for some number of golf bags across the spectrum of vehicles. Personally, I don't get it.
#308 of 348
Re: I'm back [cyclone4] by pat HOST
May 01, 2007 (12:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cyclone4 (May 01, 2007 10:34 am)

And for that kind of money you absolutely should be a happy "nut case"!

Messages Page 31 of 35
1
...
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement