Sign In Join 



Hyundai Sonata 6 cylinders or 4?

73 messages,  Last post on Jul 27, 2009 at 4:56 AM

You are in the Hyundai Sonata Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Engine, Sedan


Messages Page 7 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#54 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [cosmo15] by targettuning
Oct 27, 2008 (4:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: cosmo15 (Oct 26, 2008 5:14 pm)

Having driven both the V-6 and 4 cylinder versions for semi-extended lengths of time (rented over time frames from 3 day week-ends to week long rentals) and used them on the same drives which involve both (relatively) flat land driving via the Pa turnpike going east to driving to western Pa and the Allegheny mountains plus rural and secondary roads here in S. central Pa and I-81 going both north and south I have to make a few comments. Yes, the V-6 is a rocket on par with both the Accord and Camry V-6's and yes (no suprise) it is quicker than the 4 but I have always found the previous generation 4 w/4 speed automatic to be perfectly adequate no matter the terrain or load. The new generation with 5 speed auto should be marginally better yet. If you crave acceleration on tap and use it frequently (fuel economy be damned) the V-6 is best but I find I can cruise 70-80 mph just fine in the 4 and still have reserve to pass. There IS a reason something like 95% of all Camry and Accord are 4cylinders (and probably a like percentage of Sonata's) and that reason is...they are perfectly adequate for 95% of drivers. Obviously you are in the remaining 5%.
#55 of 73
by i360
Oct 27, 2008 (2:58 pm)
Reply
I may fall into that other 95% and feel the i4 is adequate for everyday driving. The car has loosened up over time and is somewhat quicker and nimble. Also the engine roar has died down some over time as well. Granted off the line it isn't as quick as a 6, but whats the rush? The i4 once in gear and moving can get up there fairly quickly. I've been on several long drives and you don't notice the engine when your just cruising along. I also agree that is has reserve. I was driving on I4 going to Orlando doing about 75 when I had to get by 2 tractor trailers. I just gave it more gas, went in between them (Dumb at the time) emerged out the other side and gunned it and never felt like I couldn't make it, hit 100 in a few seconds. Most of the world drives underpowered cars with no problem, for us it isn't fast enough... If your doing the limit then there isn't an issue really. Although some on ramps may be a bit hairy, but I have insurance so...... Bring it.
#56 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [cosmo15] by dave868
Oct 27, 2008 (7:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cosmo15 (Oct 26, 2008 5:14 pm)

I have only put 600 miles on the car, so my mpg sample is small... So far I am getting about 23 mpg. My split is about 70/30 city to hwy.
 
I can't stress enough how week the 4 cyl felt. The sonata is a fairly large car. The 4 cyl just has to work too hard to move it. Just to keep up traffic from stop lights i was nearly flooring it.
 
I am confident that I would get no better mileage with the 4 cyl than the v6... except for perhaps a steady 60 mph cruise.
 
22K is a decenct price for a v6 ltd w/o nav. I paid 23K with nav...which i love!
 
In my opinion, unless you do a lot of hwy cruising buy the v6...besides gas prices are dropping quickly!
#57 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [dave868] by targettuning
Oct 28, 2008 (4:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: dave868 (Oct 27, 2008 7:15 pm)

Again I say....the Accord is a fairly large car, so are the Camry and Altima but all of those are being bought as 4 cylinders by an overwhelming number of people (and historically they always have been). All these size cars have adequate to outright quick performance with 0-60 ranging from the high 7's for the Altima to the middle to lower 8's for the rest and 1/4 mile times in the 16 second and middle to upper 80's mph range. These friend are V-8 times from not too long ago and in the case of the Altima quicker yet. Please do not tell me that every traffic light prompts 0-70 mph "races" and if they do that you have to participate. I maintain that the 4 cyl. versions of all these cars are a perfect balance between performance and economy. The "bigger is better" mentality in all things is one of this country's larger problems especially when applied to choosing our personal vehicles. As for your "besides gas prices are dropping quickly" comment.....yeah, shelve the plans for buying the fuel saving car and check out the Hummer again. When someone farts in the middle east and fuel prices rise faster than they dropped you are once again stuck with a poor choice. Which points out another "problem" with the citizens of this country...no long term commitment. Get used to it, we are at the mercy of those who pull our strings as far as fuel prices. Choose well...!!
#58 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [targettuning] by dave868
Oct 28, 2008 (8:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: targettuning (Oct 28, 2008 4:26 am)

I can't speak to the drivabilty of the accord, camry or altima. I can say that when I test drove the 4cyl Sonata it was loud and weak.
 
I am not racing people at stop lights. I just want to be able to move away from a light without people beeping at me or passing me angryly as I limp away from the light.
 
While it's acceleration may be "adequate". To achieve the "adequate" acceleration, the engine had to be flogged. I feel that this results in equal and quite possibly worse MPG than the v6. While producing more pollution due to the higher revs. And causing more stress to the engine.
 
In my opinion driving underpowered cars, is false economy. I would really like to see a study of real people driving 4 and 6 cyl versions of a larger car such as the Soanta and compare results. I suspect you would be surprised.
 
All I am suggesting is that the engine be appropriate to the vehicle. If you must drive a 4 cyl, how about considering the Elantra, especially with the manual. It's nearly as large as the Soanta in interior room.
 
Again all this is, is my opinion. I cant offer hard facts. However based on the impression I get from cosmo, I would bet that if he got the 4cyl, he would drive it harder than intended. And therefore not see any mpg gain and a frustrating driving experience.
#59 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [dave868] by newowner10
Oct 28, 2008 (8:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: dave868 (Oct 28, 2008 8:29 am)

I own a 2009 Sonata 4 cylinder and I think it has plenty of power. I would say the tachometer stays below 3,500 rpm when I pull away from a stop light. I get 28 MPG around town (Not City) and 38 MPG with 4 adults highway. I noticed when I first got the car and drove it on highways that had hills with the 4 adults aboard it would downshift which I was not use to happening. I think I was originally conditioned that once a car got in high gear it stayed in high gear until you stop. I have no problem keeping up with normal people at stop signs.
#60 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [dave868] by cosmo15
Oct 28, 2008 (9:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: dave868 (Oct 27, 2008 7:15 pm)

Dave thanks for your reply. I feel you and I are on the same page with the 6 cyl over 4cyl. Im surprised your getting 23 mpg with 70/30. I think thats pretty good. What everyone needs to realize the engine debate is about opinion. I had every and I mean every intention of buying a 4cyl limited. As soon as I began my test drive within 200 feet I noticed loud, annoying and wining engine noise. That is something I personally do not like. Second you could notice and feel the car as is shifted due to lack of power under normal acceleration. When I drove the 6cyl none of these things were noticeable. It was smooth and very quite. Thats what I like in a car. Believe me I would love to save the extra money but these things would probably bother me and I would regret the purchase. Again people its all about opinion.
#61 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [targettuning] by i360
Oct 28, 2008 (9:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: targettuning (Oct 28, 2008 4:26 am)

Great post...
 
Well whatever, I feel my 2009 i4 is good enough for me to get around. And I dont have to gun it from the light like ol' lead foot seems to have to. I dont get honked at or passed and if I do so what, Americans need to slow down anyways. Thats one of the reasons we consume so much gas in the first place. That and the need to have the biggest fastest cars on the planet.
#62 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [i360] by dave868
Oct 28, 2008 (10:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: i360 (Oct 28, 2008 9:38 am)

This is primarily a discussion of opinion. And with the MPG numbers posted by newowner, I would have considered a 4 cyl. However I can't imagine them bieing realistic, unless you drive like a hypermiler. With a constant feather foot and shutting the engine off when stopped.
 
I don't want to race my fellow drivers. I just want to be able to stay out of their way.
 
Quick poll just for curiousity sake:
 
Where are we doing our driving?
 
I am in New York.
#63 of 73
IMHO by rick2456
Dec 08, 2008 (6:12 am)
Reply
I have an 07 Sonata SE v6. Recently when having my car serviced, they gave me a loaner car which happened to be a 09 limit 4 cyl. I have to agree, after driving the V6, there is no way in the world that I could ever live with the I4. It is like dragging an anchor, not to mention much more noisy.

Messages Page 7 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement