Sign In Join 



Hyundai Sonata 6 cylinders or 4?

73 messages,  Last post on Jul 27, 2009 at 4:56 AM

You are in the Hyundai Sonata Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Engine, Sedan


Messages Page 6 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#44 of 73
Re: '07 Optima Four [ray_h1] by csandste
Jan 21, 2007 (7:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ray_h1 (Jan 07, 2007 3:02 pm)

1. I finally got my car back (had a loaner) and confirmed the lack of a timing belt. I informed Edmunds that their maintenance schedule is flawed-- we'll see if they change.
 
2. Some cars match EPA levels better than others. My Malibu Maxx hits about 22-23 around town and a bit over 30 on the highway. As good or better than the EPA estimates. I note that the new 08 'Bu is listed as 26 highway. Whether this is the new improved EPA cycle, or the new improved replacement for the ancient ohv v-6 or a combination or both, I don't know.
 
3. Agree about the tightness of Hyundai engines based on the 2001 Elantra I owned. Continued to improve in gas mileage for about the first five thousand miles.
#45 of 73
Re: Which one? [ray_h1] by delaluz
Jan 22, 2007 (9:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: ray_h1 (Oct 25, 2006 11:10 am)

Does the 2007 Sonata 4 cyl have the same solid lifters?
 
(I hope note)
#46 of 73
a year ago by rick2456
Jun 30, 2008 (10:42 am)
Reply
A year ago, I would have said without a doubt go with the 6. Now however, with high gas prices and more importantly the fact that the 4 now also has the 5 sp automatic, you might consider the 4. Now if you like to feel the power, stick with the 6.
#47 of 73
Re: a year ago [rick2456] by bhmr59
Jun 30, 2008 (6:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rick2456 (Jun 30, 2008 10:42 am)

I haven't driven an '09 Sonata. However, my '05 V-6 with 170 HP has enought power for me. I think the '09 4 cyl with 175 HP would be plenty fast enough.
 
My brother says his '07 with V-6 is much faster than he needs.
#48 of 73
Take the V6 by dave868
Oct 19, 2008 (5:47 pm)
Reply
I had been planning to buy a 4cyl limited, until the test drive. It couldn't get out of its own way! I floored it and felt nothing. Made a fair bit of noise, but very very weak. I was disappointed as I have been reading others talk of decent power from the 4 and "too much" from the v6.
 
In my opinion, the sonata is just too big a car for a 4 cyl. That's why the mpg is not much better on the 4 than the 6. I would go so far as to say that some people might get better mileage with the v6,
 
I wound up with the v6, only paid $500 more than the 4. The v6 has adequate power and seems to deliver decent mileage. I have only had it 2 weeks but I am getting about 23 mpg.
 
I would have liked to see Hyundai offer a manual transmission with the v6. This is only the second automatic I have ever owned. My old 97 maxima with a manual would get well over 30 mpg on the highway. I dont think i will see that with the sonata.
 
In any case I am happy with my purchase... and very glad that I didn't buy the 4 cyl. If you must get a 4, for the the elantra with a 5 speed stick. Its not much smaller, will get much better mileage and costs less.
#49 of 73
4 cyl or 6 cyl by cosmo15
Oct 26, 2008 (8:14 am)
Reply
Well I went to the dealership with all intentions of test driving and buying a 4 cyl limited. I made the mistake of driving a 6cyl limited. The 6cyl was much smoother and more powerful. The 4cyl was was ok but i noticed the engine was louder and seemed to strain a bit on acceleration. So now im very confused on which one to buy. I truly liked the 6cyl better but it gets worse gas mileage 19/29 compared to 22/32. It does not seem like alot but today it is for me. Needless to say the 6 cyl is about two thousand more.... The 6 cyl puts the price and gas mileage in a category that compares to other vehicles l like as well. But again the 6 cyl was very nice. Someone brought up a good point to me, if your foot is constantly to the floor in the 4cyl it will use just as much gas if not more than the 6cyl.
Any advice would be appreciated.
#50 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [cosmo15] by dave868
Oct 26, 2008 (9:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: cosmo15 (Oct 26, 2008 8:14 am)

I paid $23k even for a V6 limited with nav. I feel that was a decent price. The 4cyl with nav was $21.7k.
 
I would get the V6 without question. The 4cyl is really week and quite noisy. I found that just leaving a stoplight and keeping up with traffic was a strain. And forget about passing power. I thought I should get out and push.
 
Unless you drive very leisurely I suspect you would see very little MPG benefit from the 4cyl.
#51 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [cosmo15] by backy
Oct 26, 2008 (10:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: cosmo15 (Oct 26, 2008 8:14 am)

If you don't need factory nav and can live with the pre-2009 styling, you can get a used 2007-8 V6 for about the same price as an I4... and a lot less than a new V6.
#52 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [backy] by bhmr59
Oct 26, 2008 (2:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Oct 26, 2008 10:32 am)

I'm surprized to see these reports of teh 4 cyl Sonata being under powered.
 
My '05 Sonata GLS SV is a V6, rated at 170 HP. The new 4 cyl is rated 175 HP.
 
I've always been light on the gas, more so in the last year. I do practicaly no highway driving, drive under 3 miles to work with hills (we're talking elevation changes of 200 ft), 2 stop signs ( I actually stop) and 4 traffic lights.
 
My '05 is rated 19/27. Year round I average about 19 mpg for local driving. Better in the spring & fall when the auto A/C doesn't kick on and a bit worse in summer with the A/C and worse when the temps drop below 50 and even worse when the temps are in the teens. Yet, year round, I average right about 19 mpg. If I drive 60 highway miles during a tank of gas, the mpg improvement is 1 to 2 mpg.
 
With my type of driving (short haul), I can't complain about about the MPG.
#53 of 73
Re: 4 cyl or 6 cyl [dave868] by cosmo15
Oct 26, 2008 (5:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dave868 (Oct 26, 2008 9:31 am)

dave im curious how is the gas mileage your getting on the 6 cyl. I have to say again I was very impressed with the 6 cyl very smooth and quite. I agree the 4cyl had loud engine noise and barely any power. After reading several reports how the power in the 4 cyl is sufficient, I totally disagree after the test drive. I now am leaning more towards the 6cyl. I had a dealer at 22,000 for the limited 6 cyl w/o nav. and the 4 cyl at 20,150.

Messages Page 6 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement