Sign In Join 



Changes I'd Like To See in the PT Cruiser

24 messages,  Last post on Jun 18, 2009 at 5:21 AM

You are in the Chrysler PT Cruiser Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Chrysler PT Cruiser, Future Vehicle, Wagon


Messages Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5 of 24
Improvments [yosito] by charlesf4
Dec 20, 2006 (9:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: yosito (Nov 17, 2005 6:35 pm)

Boy, I would say you nailed it!!!! I have an 2004 and it is from a long line of cars I have owned in my 75 yrs. It is one great car!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#6 of 24
My suggestions... by krony
Jan 24, 2007 (4:17 am)
Reply
I got an '06 Limited a month ago here are my suggestions:
--audio and info center steering wheel mounted controls... would be tough to do and not ruin the clean look of the interior but would be better than reaching through the steering wheel to check my mileage, etc.
--better mileage...the power is ok to me since I have a 5 sp manual but I would like 2-5 mpg better (getting 18-19.5 mpg city)
--MP3...I have the Aux jack but would like the base single disc CD player to be MP3 capable
#7 of 24
Re: Improvments [k2h] by jpf
Jan 24, 2007 (5:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: k2h (May 31, 2005 7:50 pm)

I recently rented a Cruiser and I must say that I was quite impressed with the car. For the price range, the Cruiser is stylish and offers tremendous value. Since its introduction, the car has been reliable. I don't see much to complain about with this car.
#8 of 24
How about a Diesel? by krony
Jan 27, 2007 (8:01 pm)
Reply
Was just on the Chrysler UK website...for those of us who wish we has better mileage here an answer:
 
PT Cruiser 2.4 Limited (Manual)ECONOMY
Combined Cycle 30.1 (9.4) mpg (l/100 km)
Extra Urban Cycle 38.7 (7.3) mpg (l/100 km)
Urban Cycle 21.7 (13.0) mpg (l/100 km)
 
PT Cruiser 2.2 CRD (Manual) ECONOMY
Combined Cycle 42.2 (6.7) mpg (l/100 km)
Extra Urban Cycle 50.4 (5.6) mpg (l/100 km)
Urban Cycle 32.8 (8.6) mpg (l/100 km)
#9 of 24
Re: How about a Diesel? [krony] by caliberchic
Jan 29, 2007 (10:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: krony (Jan 27, 2007 8:01 pm)

42.2 MPG that would be nice.
#10 of 24
Re: How about a Diesel? [krony] by krony
Mar 21, 2007 (12:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: krony (Jan 27, 2007 8:01 pm)

Sorry guys...made a major faux pas on the info in my earlier post. I forgot that the UK Imperial gallon is larger than the US gallon. The conversion is 1.2 to 1.
 
Here are the corrected numbers:
PT Cruiser 2.4 Limited (Manual)ECONOMY
Combined Cycle 25.1 mpg
Extra Urban Cycle 32.3 mpg
Urban Cycle 18.1 mpg
  
PT Cruiser 2.2 CRD (Manual) ECONOMY
Combined Cycle 35.2 mpg
Extra Urban Cycle 42.0 mpg
Urban Cycle 27.3 mpg
 
No matter...I'd still rather have the diesel!!
#11 of 24
Minor changes by ladyblue
Jul 04, 2007 (4:26 pm)
Reply
I'd love to see heated mirrors on this car. I'd also like the audio controls on the steering wheel, but realize that would ruin the "sporty" look of it.
 
Other than that, I love this car.
#12 of 24
Re: Improvments [k2h] by charlesf4
Aug 03, 2007 (5:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: k2h (May 31, 2005 7:50 pm)

Something smells fishy about these comments!!!
#13 of 24
Re: Improvments [charlesf4] by ptdave
Oct 25, 2007 (7:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: charlesf4 (Aug 03, 2007 5:53 pm)

Here is my 02.
 
1.I love the 06-09 headlights but I don't like the lower grill on the 06-09 PT. add the 01-05 lower grill to match the upper grill and it will sell better.
 
2. Give us a true 2 door Panel PT, Base, turbo light, and a High output GT.
 
3. Bring back the GT with Stage 1 SRT4 PT and a Panel SRT4
 
4. let us build our own GT. start out with a Cloth, no sunroof/or spoiler.and let us build it with what we want on it.
  
5. build a better Autostick for the GT.
#14 of 24
Minor changes by robman
Dec 04, 2007 (3:54 pm)
Reply
The changes needed for my '03 Limited with the 5-speed manual are minimal. At 97K miles I still get 26 MPG combined while using "Petey" for daily transportation (it's my personal micro-van). I hate the window lift switch placement and the original armrests. It needs a bit more sound insulation as well and, although I understand much of these shortcomings have been addressed in the latest models, I am left cold by the styling freshening.
 
The reliability I've enjoyed has been quite a surprise as has it's usefulness for the daily chores. I'd buy another but I hear they're being dropped. Too bad, really, as Chrysler needs a marketable vehicle now.

Messages Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement