Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Should cell phone drivers be singled out?
3688 messages, Last post on Oct 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: rockylee (Oct 18, 2006 9:03 am) What about those people where a voice recognition system will not work?
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 9:14 am) What are you talking about pal? Can you be a lil' more specific.  Thanx Rocky |
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 9:11 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 8:59 am) Yep it just takes a second or two which can be taken up by changing radio stations (BTW when radios first appeared in cars people were all outraged saying it would distract drivers), checking directions, looking at your Nav system (hey if cell phones are outlawed they should get rid of nav systems too), reading a sign alongside a road, and on and on. I hear this type of arguement logic almost daily.... I have an eight year old. "Yeah I was talking in class, but Johnny was running in the hall!" Not trying to be demeaning here, but that's like me saying it's okay to rob banks, because people rob gas stations and grocery stores, too. Or it's okay to punch people in the face, because people also rape and kidnap others. They are ALL WRONG. None of them are okay. As for nav systems, if they are shown to cause accidents... You wouldn't have to outlaw them, just have an interlock that would prevent it from operating unless the car is stopped. A couple years ago, I was paying too much attention to finding a radio station, and bumped someone from behind. Guess what... it was MY FAULT. I paid for their damage. 
|
|
|
Gadgetology: Marketing or Useful Advance Post 40 of 40.  The fix all solution.  Rocky |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tpe (Oct 18, 2006 9:22 am) I would say about the same number who don't come to a complete stop at a stop sign, or who go through the yellow light when they really should have stopped, or who make that right turn on red when traffic was just a little to close to the intersection, or the number who have followed a little to close, or the number who block driveways at lights, or...... Awe you get my drift.
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 9:12 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Oct 18, 2006 11:55 am) Well first I have to ask who caused the accident? Thats who really should pay.
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 12:02 pm) Those who don't buckle up or use helmets get what they deserve. The stupid deserve no sympathy nor respect.
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Oct 18, 2006 11:55 am) What do you think that insurance is for? I guess you could argue that it places a burden on our health care system that gets spread out amongst all of us. Okay, the same can be said for obesity. Let's make that illegal. Pretty easy to identify the offenders, baggy close can only hide so much. Oh and something like 6,000 people die each year from skin cancer. Better make laying out at the beach or pool illegal. For a society that prides itself on freedom we have an inordinate fascination with laws.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Should cell phone drivers be singled out?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
