- #91 of 3688
-
Re: Why, pray tell, can't ... [fintail]
by snakeweasel
-
Oct 18, 2006 (9:12 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Oct 18, 2006 8:40 am)
I don't expect a straight answer about which liberties are being violated.
Personal choice regarding something that just effects yourself.
|
- #92 of 3688
-
Re: Why, pray tell, can't ... [rockylee]
by snakeweasel
-
Oct 18, 2006 (9:14 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: rockylee (Oct 18, 2006 9:03 am)
That is why you need BLISS. Speaking of changing radio stations or CD's, climate setting, etc, that is why a Voice Recognition System should be safety standards.
What about those people where a voice recognition system will not work?
|
- #93 of 3688
-
Re: Why, pray tell, can't ... [snakeweasel]
by rockylee
-
Oct 18, 2006 (9:15 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 9:14 am)
What about those people where a voice recognition system will not work?
What are you talking about pal? Can you be a lil' more specific.
Thanx
Rocky
|
- #94 of 3688
-
Re: Why, pray tell, can't ... [snakeweasel]
by tpe
-
Oct 18, 2006 (9:22 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 9:11 am)
I wonder how many people who are so adamently opposed to cell phones routinely drive over the speed limit? It must be nice to be the self appointed safety czar who knows which laws should be adhered to and which ones can be blown off. Hey, I drive over the speed limit and I can tell you why. Two reasons actually. The convenience of getting to my destination quicker and it somewhat alleviates the boredom. The boredom results from performing a task that requires no where near 100% of my skill or attention. But hey, that's me. If driving does max out your capabilities then by all means, stick to the speed limit. Remember, "speed kills".
|
- #95 of 3688
-
Re: Why, pray tell, can't ... [snakeweasel]
by wideglide
-
Oct 18, 2006 (9:40 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 8:59 am)
just remember; it only takes a second or two of inattention.
Yep it just takes a second or two which can be taken up by changing radio stations (BTW when radios first appeared in cars people were all outraged saying it would distract drivers), checking directions, looking at your Nav system (hey if cell phones are outlawed they should get rid of nav systems too), reading a sign alongside a road, and on and on.
I hear this type of arguement logic almost daily.... I have an eight year old. "Yeah I was talking in class, but Johnny was running in the hall!" Not trying to be demeaning here, but that's like me saying it's okay to rob banks, because people rob gas stations and grocery stores, too. Or it's okay to punch people in the face, because people also rape and kidnap others. They are ALL WRONG. None of them are okay. As for nav systems, if they are shown to cause accidents... You wouldn't have to outlaw them, just have an interlock that would prevent it from operating unless the car is stopped. A couple years ago, I was paying too much attention to finding a radio station, and bumped someone from behind. Guess what... it was MY FAULT. I paid for their damage.
|
- #96 of 3688
-
Guys check out the story in....
by rockylee
-
Oct 18, 2006 (9:57 am)
-
|
Gadgetology: Marketing or Useful Advance
Post 40 of 40.
The fix all solution.
Rocky
|
- #97 of 3688
-
Re: Why, pray tell, can't ... [tpe]
by snakeweasel
-
Oct 18, 2006 (10:13 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: tpe (Oct 18, 2006 9:22 am)
I wonder how many people who are so adamently opposed to cell phones routinely drive over the speed limit?
I would say about the same number who don't come to a complete stop at a stop sign, or who go through the yellow light when they really should have stopped, or who make that right turn on red when traffic was just a little to close to the intersection, or the number who have followed a little to close, or the number who block driveways at lights, or...... Awe you get my drift.
|
- #98 of 3688
-
Re: Why, pray tell, can't ... [snakeweasel]
by fintail
-
Oct 18, 2006 (11:55 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 9:12 am)
But it doesn't just affect yourself. Who pays for the injuries when lazy/stupid unbelted people get splattered on their dashboards? Not the injured.
|
- #99 of 3688
-
Re: Why, pray tell, can't ... [fintail]
by snakeweasel
-
Oct 18, 2006 (12:02 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Oct 18, 2006 11:55 am)
Who pays for the injuries
Well first I have to ask who caused the accident? Thats who really should pay.
|
- #100 of 3688
-
Re: Why, pray tell, can't ... [snakeweasel]
by fintail
-
Oct 18, 2006 (12:04 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 12:02 pm)
Questions aren't answered with questions.
Those who don't buckle up or use helmets get what they deserve. The stupid deserve no sympathy nor respect.
|