Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Should cell phone drivers be singled out?
3688 messages, Last post on Oct 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: gagrice (Oct 18, 2006 6:34 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Oct 18, 2006 6:34 am) No its just that its the flavor of the month. Instead of actually dealing with the root of the problem they slap on a flintstones bandaid onto the sucking chest wound then strut around pounding their chest saying "see, I fixed the problem" when in fact they did no such thing. I just do not understand defending a practice that is so openly abused. Its not a defense of any practice, it is a realistic look at an issue and questioning a "solution" that doesn't really address the root problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tpe (Oct 18, 2006 6:54 am) Thats why we have hair dryers with warnings not to use in the shower. Or why my iron came with a warning not to iron my cloths when they were on my body (makes me wonder if its ok to iron them if they are on someone elses body). And my favorite which I found on a bag of peanuts "This item contains peanuts, do not consume if you are allergic to peanuts". I truely rear for the republic. |
|
|
Replying to: tpe (Oct 18, 2006 4:13 am) Indeed. Like my friend who got a broken leg and lots of other injuries on his bike when a 19 year old girl made a left turn right into his path..... while talking on her cell phone. Face it, the only reason people are defending cell phone usage while driving, is because THEY DO IT. And those claiming superior driving and multitasking skills, just remember; it only takes a second or two of inattention. Would you still be able to rationalize it away if you just took your eyes off the road for a couple seconds to answer a call, and ran over a six year old kid chasing a ball into the street? If you get a call, pull over. It's not that hard to do. If you can't, call them back at the next exit you get off. It can wait five minutes. 10 or 12 years ago, there were no cell phones, and we somehow managed to survive!
|
|
|
The death toll from crashes caused by drivers talking on their wireless phones appears to be rising significantly as the devices become must-have accessories for many Americans. A study released today by Harvard University's Center for Risk Analysis estimates a rate of 2,600 deaths a year in such crashes, compared with the same researchers' estimate of 1,000 two years ago. The study also estimated that 570,000 injuries a year and 1.5 million crashes resulting in property damage can be blamed on wireless phone use. That seems pretty compelling. 
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Oct 18, 2006 6:54 am) I've done that most of my life. Very few laws are of any value if not enforced. Face it most are not. I believe forcing seatbelt and helmet laws on us is much more a violation of civil liberties than stopping people from using a cell phone that could cause others harm.
|
|
|
Replying to: wideglide (Oct 18, 2006 7:17 am) Rocky
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Oct 18, 2006 7:41 am) If you don't buckle up, you're stupid...it's an easy equation.
|
|
|
Replying to: rockylee (Oct 18, 2006 7:43 am) I estimate that in 2007 there will 1,000 more crashes caused by drivers thinking about their next post on Edmunds.com. For the calendar year 2006, I estimated that there would only be 500 more crashes caused by this. Obviously, crashes caused by distracted Edmunds.com posters are increasingly dramatically. Wow, I should apply for a job at Harvard...
|
|
|
Replying to: grbeck (Oct 18, 2006 8:12 am)  I have no doubt you'd make a great professor.  Rocky |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Should cell phone drivers be singled out?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
