Sign In Join 



Should cell phone drivers be singled out?

3688 messages,  Last post on Oct 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Safety


Messages Page 354 of 370
1
...
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
...
370
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3526 of 3688
Re: [boaz47] by steve_ HOST
Dec 25, 2008 (9:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Dec 25, 2008 9:32 am)

The implied message is to safely pull over to the shoulder, stop, and call.
#3527 of 3688
Re: [steve_] by boaz47
Dec 25, 2008 (6:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 25, 2008 9:51 am)

  I toss the fertilizer flag. The implied message? The operator will ask questions that you can't answer from the side of the road. we all have listened to 911 calls on TV.
#3528 of 3688
Re: [boaz47] by steve_ HOST
Dec 25, 2008 (6:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Dec 25, 2008 6:22 pm)

Ouch - well, hopefully that'll be the last one of those flags I get this year. I'm running out of floor space.
#3529 of 3688
Re: [steve_] by boaz47
Dec 25, 2008 (7:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 25, 2008 6:53 pm)

Don't worry, you get to toss all the old ones out January 1st.
#3530 of 3688
you rang? by steve_ HOST
Dec 26, 2008 (8:51 am)
Reply
Speaking of the educational component:
 
"[G]roups like NSC and AAA are gearing up for massive public awareness campaigns on par with those that were successful in turning public opinion against drunk driving.
 
One watchdog group has already gone as far as filing a lawsuit against the Bush administration, charging that records on traffic deaths related to phone use by drivers is being withheld by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration."
 
Groups to Push for More Curbs, Education on Phone Use Behind the Wheel in 2009
 
#3531 of 3688
Re: you rang? [steve_] by boaz47
Dec 26, 2008 (2:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 26, 2008 8:51 am)

Oh yes, this is all Bush's fault. Johnson had Kennedy killed, there were space aliens killed in Roswell and we never landed on the moon. They all fit together.
#3532 of 3688
Re: you rang? [boaz47] by steve_ HOST
Dec 26, 2008 (2:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Dec 26, 2008 2:13 pm)

Information wants to be free.
#3533 of 3688
every time by nippononly
Dec 27, 2008 (11:00 am)
Reply
I think I will stay out of this thread permanently, it sucks me back in! Are we seriously proposing writing a new law for every thing we want to educate the public on from now on??!! That is absurd. How many laws do we want as a society? Personally, I say the less the better.
 
kd, if you seriously think that cops are now going to be pulling over people who they noticed looking down, I need to gather some links to videos of all the outrageous things police completely ignore routinely, every day, out on the roads. Not to mention they will be killing precious time on a driver who may or may not (since they could have been looking down at any of a dozen or more things, only one of which is a phone) have been breaking a law with a tiny fine and no driver penalty, when they could be giving out those juicy speeding tickets which, let's face it, occupy 99.9% of all enforcement time of every cop on the road. That is not an accident, they are directed to do so by the cities and counties paying their fairly high salaries, who want to see lots of expensive speeding, red light, and stop sign tickets rolling in, along with the revenue they generate.
 
There are counties along I-5 between LA and SF where going 15 over the limit will cost you well over $300, NOT including traffic school fees, and that's the speed everyone is going out there! Which do you suppose those counties want sheriffs and CHP giving out, the $300+ speeding tickets or the $20 cell phone tickets??
 
Bingo!
#3534 of 3688
Re: every time [nippononly] by steve_ HOST
Dec 27, 2008 (11:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Dec 27, 2008 11:00 am)

every time I think I will stay out of this thread permanently, it sucks me back in!
 
Gotcha.
 
The driving distracted laws aren't working. Why not a new one? Or maybe make all driving distracted infractions a $300 ticket?
#3535 of 3688
Re: every time [steve_] by boaz47
Dec 27, 2008 (12:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 27, 2008 11:07 am)

"The driving distracted laws aren't working. Why not a new one? Or maybe make all driving distracted infractions a $300 ticket? "
 
good post but lets see if I can fix it for you?
 
The driving distracted laws aren't being enforced. Why not a new one, that won't be enforced? Or maybe make all driving distracted infractions a $300 ticket even if they never write the ticket? After all weren't the legislators forced to give themselves a monster raise for all the hard work they have been doing making up these laws that aren't enforced? Looks like they are spending the money they aren't getting. So how about this? everyone that supports a law that isn't enforced just sends in the money it will cost to pay for an officer that will get paid for simply enforcing that new law? What a concept, planning on how to make a law work? Oh forget it, just write a law outlawing accidents, that will solve everything.

Messages Page 354 of 370
1
...
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
...
370
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement