Sign In Join 



Chrysler Pacifica Transmission Problems

744 messages,  Last post on Nov 29, 2009 at 8:23 PM

You are in the Chrysler Pacifica Maintenance & Repair Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Chrysler Pacifica, Transmission, Wagon


Messages Page 63 of 75
1
...
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
...
75
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#615 of 744
Re: Design problem [farout] by faschulz
Feb 14, 2009 (8:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: farout (Feb 09, 2009 1:33 pm)

forout:
I sent those numbers to Richard (chrysler) and explain to him that I was charged with some damage but in fact the car is like new inside and out side I take care of my cars very much and looks like new, I mention to him that I agree to pay half of the miles which is $2923 for the 24,600 miles my Pac has, and that the fact that the car has so many miles is because the service advisor told me that the break in time for the converter is 5000 miles so if you get the original plus two that they replace that equals 15,000 miles, also that the extended warranty that they sold me I cancelled after 3 days and the refund for $2,826.56 was received by Chrysler financial and applied to principal, he told me that he will call impartial services and will let me know, by the afternoon he called me and told me that was a mistake and all was fixed, the amount comes now to $13,300 , that is if I got a Chrysler car
if not I'll be charged with the whole $5847.79 for the 24,600 miles for me still high.
by the way I went and test drive the PAC signatures series that I can get for $24,000 (full loaded) and the feel at the begining was good with no front suspension noise, but when i went to open road I noticed that the transmission just shifts up to third gear and was about 4,000 Rpm at 50 miles per hour the auto stick was not working as well , so I forgot the Pac It's a shame , I think I will get the Aspen because beleive it or not has better resale price than the town and country, I can get one fully loaded MSRP $40,300 for $30,000 plus taxes.
I'll keep in touch.
 
Regards.
#616 of 744
Re: Design problem [faschulz] by farout
Feb 15, 2009 (5:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: faschulz (Feb 14, 2009 8:13 am)

faschulz: I happen to remember that my buy took place when DC was the company not Cerberus, That may be part of your situation. Whatever you choose it seems to me you are going at it the right way.
 
What's odd you post just showed up on this forum today. I wonder why it takes so long for your posts to show? I chech this forum just about every day so it sure is odd.
 
Good luck, keep in touch
 
farout
#617 of 744
Re: Design problem [faschulz] by rhollis
Feb 16, 2009 (6:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: faschulz (Feb 14, 2009 8:13 am)

A similar "mistake" was made with my buyback. My offer from Chrysler was $2,700 short. I could not figure out where the discrepancy came from until the dealer sent a paper that someone had altered after I signed it to Impartial Services. They had slipped in $2,700 in negative equity, but in Ohio, the buyer has to sign a form stating that he realizes there is negative equity. There wasn't, but someone tried to pull a fast one.
#618 of 744
Re: Design problem [farout] by faschulz
Feb 20, 2009 (1:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: farout (Feb 15, 2009 5:04 pm)

farout these are final numbers that we agreed in the buy back of my Pac Check I'll receive a check next week I got Chrysler 08 Aspen for $30,800 with all extras also Nav, MSRP was $40,700 I think was good deal.
 
The breakdown of figures pertaining to the repurchase of your vehicle is as follows:
 
CREDITS
Down Payment $ 9,499.03
Net Trade In Allowance 0.00
Monthly Payments Made (# payments) 16 X
$424.80 (mo.payment) 6,796.80
Flat Amount 0.00
Aftermarket Accessories 0.00
   0.00
  0.00
 CREDITS SUBTOTAL $ 16,295.83 *
      
      
DEBITS
Rebate(if Applicable) $ 0.00
Mileage/Usage Fee 2,923.90
Damage (Requires Estimate) 0.00
  0.00
 DEBITS SUBTOTAL $ 2,923.90 *
      
      
 PAYOFF TO LIENHOLDER $ 17,400.71
      
 NET REFUND TO CUSTOMER $ 13,371.93 *
 (
#619 of 744
Re: Design problem [faschulz] by farout
Feb 21, 2009 (3:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: faschulz (Feb 20, 2009 1:04 pm)

fashulz: Good yor you! I am sure you will be pleased with the Aspen! Please let me know how you like it and what mpg you wind up getting.
 
farout
#620 of 744
Re: Design problem [farout] by faschulz
Mar 03, 2009 (6:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: farout (Feb 21, 2009 3:54 pm)

Farout I just realized why the dealers and the country are in deep water, I received the check from Chrysler and try to buy the Aspen that I told you before but the problem is that Chrysler is financing with a low 16.9% and they told me that I was lucky, considering that I'm giving 50% down payment those guys are crazy at the time they told me that I just left the dealer, I think I will never go back to them, I was financing my Pacifica for 6%, I will put my money in something else I have never make a late payment I think I will buy something cash I'll let you know.
#621 of 744
Re: Design problem [faschulz] by farout
Mar 03, 2009 (6:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: faschulz (Mar 03, 2009 6:00 pm)

faschulz: OH what a rotten thing to have happen. Was that Chrysler Financial? I believe a bank could do a lot better. Remember with the dealerfinding the financing the dealer gets a certian percent of the APR you pay. I think the dealer was not very hungry or the dealer is in trouble and needs every dime they can choke out of you. What state do you live in? You can go www.chryslerfinancial.com/ and get your own financing, did you know that? Chrysler was who we financed out PAC with 72 months, 6.9% and $ 5,000. rebate and we put $ 2,000. down. I am pleased with how it worked out, but the dealer kept telling us he could not get anything less than 11% so Chrysler Financial handled it all, and the dealer had to fill out all the paper work. The dealer was not very pleased, we got out PAC 08/31/07 we not have 35,350 miles on it. I sure whish you had gotten better service out of your PAC. It sure sounds like the Service dept was muffed up royal to me.
 
Hope something I have said helps.
 
farout
#622 of 744
Re: Design problem [farout] by faschulz
Mar 03, 2009 (11:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: farout (Mar 03, 2009 6:37 pm)

I was the same in mine but they did not gave me the rebates because they told me that was or one or the other I got mine on 09/23/07 , I always tought that something was wrong, but they asure me that, now that you are telling me that i realized that the dealer got those $4000 of the rebate.
I think that they are giving those huge rebates and discounts because they will get that amout back in the interest, I will try do it my self with chrysler and my bank,
 
I will keep posting.
Regards.
 
i
#623 of 744
Re: Design problem [faschulz] by rhollis
Mar 04, 2009 (5:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: faschulz (Mar 03, 2009 11:54 pm)

I have no idea where you live, but in Cleveland the dealers claim that they are nearly giving the cars away - all sorts of incentives, rebates, employee pricing, and 0%.
#624 of 744
Re: Design problem [rhollis] by faschulz
Mar 04, 2009 (6:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: rhollis (Mar 04, 2009 5:01 am)

I live in Miami ,Florida, I think the dealers has to do with that because I called Chrysler financial and told them that I had 6.7% on the pac that they just bought from me and now the minimum they want is 15.7 % paying 50% down payment they said that the dealers do the approvals so yes they give you nice discounts but at the end you pay them twice.

Messages Page 63 of 75
1
...
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
...
75
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement