Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Cadillac CTS/CTS-V Cadillac CTS/CTS-V: Tell Cadillac What You Want!
19 messages, Last post on Mar 03, 2009 at 10:41 AM
You are in the Cadillac CTS/CTS-V Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
| What suggestions do you have for Cadillac about the CTS and CTS-V? | |
|
Replying to: KarenS (Oct 12, 2006 1:34 pm) |
|
|
I like what Cadillac is doing in general the last few years with the CTS/XLR/STS. Here are the things I would like to see in the revamped CTS-V (which I would potentially be in the market to obtain): 1) Automatic transmission option (or at least a DSG type option). Yeah, I know, performance machine needs a manual, but not all of us like manual even if we appreciate performance. 2) An interior that looks, feels and sounds top of the line. High quality leather, dash that is sqeak-proof, etc. 3) State of the art, touch screen Nav/Radio/etc. unit. 4) Heated and cooled seats (and I mean really cool, not playing at cool with minor fan action) 5) Slightly larger trunk space 6) Slightly stiffer feel for steering, and more rigid/extreme feel for braking 7) Comfort seats, with lots of variable adjustments (articulating backs, side bolsters, etc.) 8) Memory seat for passenger as well as driver 9) Bose super surround sound system 10) Voice command system that works well, including bluetooth phone ability 11) HUD (modern looking, multi-color readout) 12) Paddle shift for automatic or DSG-type transmission 13) More color choices for interior and exterior
|
|
|
I would agree with just about everything Riceowls has posted. I don't necessarily need a manual trans to have good performance, as a matter of fact, a six speed manual with sequential shift is a better alternative for a daily driver. (Besides, I've just finished restoring my 69 Vette w/4 speed for fun driving) I would also like to see an AWD Sport model similar to Audi which would incorporate the stability of AWD with the handling of a sport suspension. My biggest request is for Caddy to follow through with their hints and rumors of a CTS coupe. This would put them in direct competition with BMW and MB. I think the CTS is a magnificent piece of automotive design and could go head to head with the German and Japanese with some of the upgrades we've mentioned. Go Caddy !! |
|
|
Replying to: riceowls (Nov 06, 2006 1:39 pm) |
|
|
Sirs: For 2008, sell a limited number of stripper 2.8 Sport Light sedans with possitive displacement supercharging. I already own a 2007 stripper with automatic and sports suspension. It is a sweet little humingbird of a car. However, the very same car with 6-8 psi positive displacement blower would be my dream sedan. Your 3.6, please forgive the explitive, sucks. I have driven smoother tractors built in the 1940's. Some of us don't need CTS-Vs. For instance, I have a Kenne Bell supercharged 1991, Lincoln Mark VII to use if I really want a smoky burn out. Instead, give me a refined, blown 2.8 and THIS household will boast His and Hers CTS Caddis! David Jakab! |
|
|
Dear Rice Owls and friends. I suggest Rice purchase a Buick of some sort, or maybe a Malibu. My good buddy has both a Lexus LSC 430 and a Malibu, and when it comes to transcontinental trips, he uses the Malibu. CTS? I want BMW's & Mercs to chase ME! Forget about all the BLING. Bling means weight, and that means slow.
|
|
|
OK, now that we've seen the new CTS I think most of the questions and wish list requests have been answered, at least in picture form. The true test will be when we're able to see it and drive it. As I've stated in other posts my special request is that Caddy follows through with the coupe concept. I'd like it to remain the same basic size as the new CTS and have all the options that the sedan will have. One thing from a styling point that I'd like to see. A more rounded roof line similar to the Honda Civic coupe with the side rear window ending in a curve rather than a sharp point the way the sedan does. I think these two modifications would give the coupe a more graceful appearance. |
|
|
Replying to: ejdavid (Jan 10, 2007 12:02 pm) That's a very strange suggestion, being that I'm an avid BMW owner/fan (5 of last 6 vehicles) and my wife a Mercedes fan (3 of last 6 cars). You must not have checked out the latest BMW and Merc offerings - they have all of the goodies I listed. Perhaps it's you who are out of touch with these "Luxury" sports cars, and should instead check out "non-Luxury" offerings like Camaros and Mustangs, that don't have the so-called bling? If the CTS-V want to compete with the M and AMG cars, it needs what you call bling and what most of the rest of the world calls common luxury features. |
|
|
OK guys what gives? I just finished reading the latest M/T article on future Caddys and they say the coupe won't be available until 2010. If this is the case it puts a real crimp in my plans. I wanted to get a new CTS with the 08 model, then read that the 09 model year will have a coupe. If they hold off until 10 I'll have an 8 year old car on my hands. Evok, what's up. jpenn |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Cadillac CTS/CTS-V Cadillac CTS/CTS-V: Tell Cadillac What You Want!
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Cadillac CTS
2010 Cadillac CTS-V
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
