Sign In Join 



Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan: Test Drives

24 messages,  Last post on Jul 17, 2007 at 3:19 PM

You are in the Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Car Buying, Sedan


Messages Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#15 of 24
Fusion/Milan AWD vibration at 70 MPH by hiddenvalley1
Feb 02, 2007 (8:51 am)
Reply
I have taken 2 Milan AWD and one Fusion AWD for test drives at two diferent dealers, and encountered what feels like a serious driveline vibration in all of them at 65-70 MPH. It feels like a bad u-joint feels in a rear drive vehicle. The salesman expressed surprise (of course) in all cases. Does anyone know what's up with this and what Ford is doing about it?
#16 of 24
Re: Fusion/Milan AWD vibration at 70 MPH [hiddenvalley1] by jeffyscott
Feb 02, 2007 (4:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hiddenvalley1 (Feb 02, 2007 8:51 am)

Hmmm, didn't some have a similar issue with the Jaguar X-type? I would assume this has the same AWD system.
#17 of 24
Re: Fusion/Milan AWD vibration at 70 MPH [jeffyscott] by akirby
Feb 02, 2007 (8:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Feb 02, 2007 4:17 pm)

It's not the same. This is a new in-house Ford design that is similar to the Haldex unit used by Volvo.
#18 of 24
Re: Fusion/Milan AWD vibration at 70 MPH [akirby] by jeffyscott
Feb 03, 2007 (7:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Feb 02, 2007 8:17 pm)

But the Jag does use the Volvo-type system, too...doesn't it?
#19 of 24
Re: Fusion/Milan AWD vibration at 70 MPH [jeffyscott] by akirby
Feb 03, 2007 (8:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Feb 03, 2007 7:01 am)

Not sure - couldn't find much information on it.
#20 of 24
Re: Fusion/Milan AWD vibration at 70 MPH [akirby] by jeffyscott
Feb 03, 2007 (8:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Feb 03, 2007 8:03 am)

From descriptions I found, it sounds like they are quite different, actually. I found this description on Jaguar site:
 
full-time Traction 4™ all-wheel drive. Standard power ratio is 40:60 front to rear, resulting in a rear-wheel drive-like feel, but the instant a difference in grip is sensed, power is redistributed for optimum traction.
 
The Fusion's description says majority of power is to front wheels under normal circumstances.
#21 of 24
Road & Engine Noise in Cabin by mikezak
Jul 10, 2007 (5:25 am)
Reply
I am 'considering' a Fusion with an I4, but was concerned about engine and road noise in the cabin. I have to confess that I have NOT yet taken one for a test drive, but:
1). I have a Mazda Tribute with the Ford I4 Cyl engine and the road and engine noice is terrible.
2) Consumer Rpts notes that sound is an issue with the 4 Cyl.
 
Should I just stay away, and concentrate on the Nissan Altima or Hyundai Sonata with their 4 Cyl engines?
 
Thanks
#22 of 24
Re: Road & Engine Noise in Cabin [mikezak] by theump
Jul 10, 2007 (12:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mikezak (Jul 10, 2007 5:25 am)

Mikezak,
I own a 2006 4/5sp.1+yrs. and I can tell you that to me,I do not notice any bad engine noise.The car has been flawless for 11k miles so far and the mpg has increased a couple more up to 25-27 city and 28-33 hwy.I'm also a sports official,so I take a few 25-100 mile trips traveling to and from venues and my partners comment alot about how smooth and pleasant the car is .(Hope this helps you)
#23 of 24
Re: Road & Engine Noise in Cabin [mikezak] by exner60
Jul 14, 2007 (7:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mikezak (Jul 10, 2007 5:25 am)

Hi Mikezak,
 
Try all three. That's the only way to know for sure. I just purchased a 2007 Milan Premier I4 5M for which I traded a 2004 Dodge Ram 2500 HEMI 5M. Compared to the Ram, the Milan is quiet!
 
Rich
#24 of 24
Test drive of a base Ford Fusion by bob8568
Jul 17, 2007 (3:19 pm)
Reply
Yesterday I test drove a Ford Fusion because I need a new company car and the choices this time is the Ford Fusion or the Chrysler Sebring. We are limited to the four cylinder engine and usually a basic car (A/C, power windows, locks, mirrors, and seats, AM/FM/CD player, but no leather). The vehicle I tried out fit the bill, as far as my company would purchase.
 
I have to say I was disappointed in the Fusion on many levels. First, I must qualify, that I am about 6 foot tall, and most of it is waist up. I do not fit in most cars with sunroofs (this car did not have a sunroof). In the Fusion I found my head scraping the ceiling of the car even though the seat was all the way down. I finally checked and I could put an index finger between my head and the ceiling- that was it. I also had a problem with the door assist above the drivers door as it was so close to my head that I accidently banged my head on it. In a normal driving position it was two fingers away from my head- not a lot of room for me and since I drive about 50k miles per year, room is important. I also found the seat to be uncomfortable, and realized that the seat back was encouraging a slouching position, which would be very uncomfortable for a 400 mile day.
 
Most of the controls seemed fine, though I was disappointed in the gearshift position only having a D and L choices. This is a 5 speed transmission and would prefer to have a D, 4,3,2,1 option. Since I drive a lot in the winter (snow belt area) I would want more than a "L" as an option. I prefer to use the transmission to help slow the car down in heavy snow or ice.
 
When driving the car, I thought the engine sounded a little course. I noticed that the car downshifted very frequently when I needed more power. I also felt the car was a little "darty" on the freeway and at this point will blame it on the vehicle possibly being out of alignment. Regardless, it was not a stable feeling.
 
Since I am presently driving a Dodge Charger, I initially chalked all this up to my being used to a large car and maybe this is the price I'll have to pay. Then I drove the Chrysler Sebring, which admittedly has not ranked as high as the Fusion on Consumer Reports ratings, but I found the Sebring to have plenty of head room, both on top and on the sides. The transmission has a D, 3 L setting, which would be acceptable in snow/ice driving (an improvement over the Fusion). According to the window sticker, the Chrysler has a 4 speed transmission compared to the Ford's 5, yet gets 1 mpg better city and 1 mpg better highway fuel mileage than the Fusion.
 
Before driving the cars, I thought the choice would be hard to make, but after taking both of them out, I have to pick the Chrysler Sebring. Others who are not tall waisted probably would fit fine in the Ford, but unfortunately, not me.

Messages Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement