You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan
Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan: Test Drives

24 messages, Last post on Jul 17, 2007 at 3:19 PM
You are in the Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
I test-drove Fusion with 3.0L and black leather and black piano interior in the dealership nearby. I really liked the interior of this particular trim. I feel and look upscale. Engine is smoother than in my Sable but is not more powerful. May be you will fill difference on freeway, but in city feels almost the same. Suspension is rather soft, but I expected sport sedan variety. Steering is not stiff at all. I was driving around town with salesman next to me so I cannot tell more. Car seemed to me be a pretty small, but there is more legroom in the back than in my Sable. But still I like how Focus rides better – it also seems to be faster than Fusion. BTW when pressing on the gas to pass I test drove could rev to 5000 rpm. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: savetheland (Aug 07, 2006 1:53 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: mr_anton89 (Aug 07, 2006 3:58 pm) |
|
|
|
|
I thought I would add to the discussion by sharing my thoughts about the Fusion which I rented at Newark airport for one day. The trim was SE, and it was an automatic, but not sure about the engine. Here are my impressions: Fit and materials: Materials seemed nice and I did not hear any rattles etc., in spite of the 12,000 very hard rental miles Ride and handling: Ride seemed very harsh and car was bouncing over imperfect road surfaces. It reminded me of my '95 Integra as far as ride and handling goes. Some may prefer this type of ride, I don't. Gas mileage: Impressive. On almost 100% highway driving, I got 30+ mpg. It comes as no surprise, because Hertz markets these cars as "green". Pickup Poor. Car reacts to hard acceleration demands by merely revving up and then by ponderously picking up speed. Visibility Front is good, rear is bad. The rear view was pretty much obstructed due to the design of the rear window. This reminded of my '95 Prelude, which had the same sloping design. Noise Wow! At idle, I could not hear the engine at all! At highway speeds, it is very muted. Excellent job! Ergonomics Pleasing and intuitive dials and gauges and I did not have to refer to the manual for anything. The icon that lights up on dash when cruise is on is very nice. Overall I don't think I will go for this car again(still prefer the Hyundai Sonata V6 in rentals), but it is light years ahead of the Taurus.
|
|
|
Replying to: black_tulip (Oct 03, 2006 5:03 am) |
|
I just spent the morning test driving a Fusion SEL and a 500. I liked everything about the Fusion except I found the seat cushion to be a little short and overly firm for me and the ride quality a bit stiff. For those owners who have had the Fusion for a while, does it loosen up a bit? While I don't expect the ride quality of the 500 I'm wondering if the ride and the seat softens up after a break-in period. I'm sure the low profile tires don't help either.
|
|
|
Replying to: rs_petty (Sep 30, 2006 11:17 am) i am an aggressive driver and generally go a little bit less than twice the speed limit everywhere, including off ramps, and thats where you would really appreciate a hard suspension the ride quality is getting softer but it becomes harder to corner well. its not the tire pressure cuz i check them to be the same 33 psi is it normal for suspensions to get softer, or am i damaging my car? |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rs_petty (Sep 30, 2006 11:17 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan
Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan: Test Drives
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Ford Fusion
2010 Mercury Milan



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats