Sign In Join 



Acura MDX vs BMW X5

126 messages,  Last post on Jun 08, 2009 at 12:20 PM

You are in the Acura MDX Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Acura MDX, BMW X5, SUV


Messages Page 8 of 13
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#67 of 126
Re: May '07 Car and Driver Comparison [varmint] by anon3
Apr 05, 2007 (7:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: varmint (Apr 04, 2007 9:53 am)

I suspect that Car & Driver and other magazines are starting to make the point that some Japanese and American car manufacturers are closing the sport performance gap in areas where BMW traditionally had an advantage (like steering, handling, suspensions, and drive dynamics.) A 260hp BMW costs about the same as a 300hp Acura and a 320 hp Cadillac. When most of the performance measures are running neck and neck, the car that costs $10k less will win the comparison. So is it worth it to pay a $10 - 15k premium in price for a 350hp BMW V-8 to out perform a Japanese V-6 or an American V-8? Some would say it's not when the competition is so close.
#68 of 126
may car and driver by cspillman
Sep 23, 2007 (6:18 pm)
Reply
They should have compared the srx v6 and see how that stacks up.
I have driven all the luxury models I think the new mazda cx9 kicks all their asses.
BMW is too heavy/slow in the 3.0, no powerliftgate and not as much fun to drive. (yes, even with the sports package) Other than that it looks the best. If they improve the power I will probably get one.
ML350- actually very impressed but the shifter on the steering column is a no go..don't care to manually shift only when my hands are in the 10 and 2 position. They are part of the steering wheel. Also, Mercedes has the worst navigation I've seen.
MDX-would buy it in a second if it had comfort access. What the hell is wrong with them? An Altima has keyless start but only the big sedan acura has the keyless start. They also have the best nav I've seen.
As a Realtor I feel luxury is important but I have to say I keep coming back to the price and driving fun and the Mazda does a great job.
#69 of 126
Re: may car and driver [cspillman] by achonko
Sep 25, 2007 (11:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: cspillman (Sep 23, 2007 6:18 pm)

You are right, the BMW X5 3.0i is not the most compelling SUV to buy amongst its peers(ML350, Audi Q7 V6, Acura MDX, Porsche Cayenne V6), perhaps there is a reason why it is not selling so well in the US.
 
Compared to the other six cylinder SUVs, it ranks as one of the most expensive ones out there, I guess it is leading the segment in terms of being the most expensive one.
 
Comparing the respective engine outputs, the X5 3.0i is the weakest of the bunch.
#70 of 126
MDX, X5 and Lexus RX (2008) by peilinx
Dec 22, 2007 (5:57 pm)
Reply
I went out to test drive three of them today, and I didn't expect to find out what I found out. X5 (3.0) gives a smoother ride in my opinion. The engine seems a little small for the size of the truck. We didn't test drive 4.8 V8. I always felt that Lexus is the smoother one, and MDX is in between, but that was not the case. Personally, I like MDX, really because it is a lot cheaper, but my wife likes X5 better.
 
It is never too old to be surprised.
 
p
#71 of 126
Re: Business Week Review [dt63944] by tpulak
Dec 23, 2007 (7:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: dt63944 (Mar 18, 2007 6:23 am)

The older Acura's do have some problems, like the ones equipped with the 5 speed transmission, at hardly 30-50k they clog up, resulting in the need for a new transmision. But the new Acuras are very reliable. I mean tell me, when was the last time, and 04-07 Acura stuck on the side of the highway?
#72 of 126
Re: May '07 Car and Driver Comparison [anon3] by tpulak
Jan 05, 2008 (10:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: anon3 (Apr 03, 2007 6:05 am)

Who needs a V-8 option, when the V-6 in the Acura beats some V-8's?? Also, when the gas prices hit $4 , like they are now, you wouldn't want one. Also, whats against the stylling of the MDX? People just hardly look at it, and call it"a minivan", just because, back in 2001, it had a third row seat(which was pretty rare in vehicles that time). This minivan thing continues even today, in its new generation. Personally, the BMW looks like a 3 series, on stilts, and looks like it will tip over one day. But I can't argue, though, 'cuz its up to your opinion. Also, you said that there was a sea of Acura MDX's in your area---where do you live??!! I'd like to know, because I live in Dallas, Texas, and it is rare to see an MDX. And to this time in the forum, based on what people are saying, I'm leaning towards the MDX.
#73 of 126
Re: May '07 Car and Driver Comparison [tpulak] by chrism124
Jan 06, 2008 (8:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpulak (Jan 05, 2008 10:56 am)

tpulak, just a note but you are responding to a post dated April 07. What that said, I am going through the process of selecting a replacement for our current family hauler, a 06 Volvo XC90 V8. The three being considered are the Q7, X5 and MDX. Each model has pros & cons (but that is typical in any vehicle comparison). At the moment both the X5 and MDX are the front runners (with a slight edge to the MDX).
 
While styling is very subjective, it is my opinion that the X5 is the best looking vehicle, inside and out. It has the best ride but the base engine needs a bit more tuning. The soon to be available diesel option would be very attractive. Lot's of torque and good fuel economy. The downside is the price tag. For a comparably equipped model, X5 to MDX, I would need to spend another $9k. While within my financial reach, I'm not sure that I can justify it.
 
The MDX is a good vehicle. The front could use a redesign but in a dark color it doesn't look as bad. Again, this is my opinion but also is noted in most auto reviews. At a potential $44k purchase price, fully loaded, this is a bargin. I wish the MDX had the smart key access, 6-speed auto and real wood (the fake stuff is a bit shinny) but it is not a deal breaker for me.
 
Why would someone want a V8? A V8 provides better low-end torque which results in a better setup for towing. While the MDX might be rated for 5000 lbs of towing, it may struggle a bit under full load.
 
Regards,
NHman
#74 of 126
Re: May '07 Car and Driver Comparison [tpulak] by bruceomega
Jan 07, 2008 (10:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpulak (Jan 05, 2008 10:56 am)

..... the BMW looks like a 3 series, on stilts, and looks like it will tip over one day .....
 
FWIW:
 
My wife and I recently alternated between driver and shotgun driving new V-8 X5's around the off-road circuit at their performance driving school. It was uncanny how far the X5 could lean sideways and not tip over. The instructor said the max left-right tilt we encountered on that course was + / - 35 degrees, and the X5 is capable of up to 45 degrees.
 
We also took turns driving a 3.0 I-6 X5 around a short road race circuit, going as fast as we wanted to / as fast as we could go, over the same course where we were driving sedans and coupes. I was absolutely amazed at how well the X5 did. It wasn't as fast as the cars we drove, but the handling really impressed me, especially considering the mass and height.
 
Bruce
#75 of 126
Re: May '07 Car and Driver Comparison [chrism124] by love2driveinct
Jan 09, 2008 (6:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: chrism124 (Jan 06, 2008 8:55 am)

Just wondering... what makes you not want to get another XC90, if you don't mind me asking? I have an 06 MDX and while I LOVE this vehicle, I find that when I see the XC90's driving by, I still drool... When the lease is up next winter, an 08 MDX will definitely be a front-runner, but I will be very seriously considering the XC90 and X5 once again.
 
You mentioned the XC90 as your "family hauler", so I am curious what the downsides are in that capacity?
 
I have three children, who will be 11, 8, and 4 when we replace our MDX. Any thoughts? TIA
#76 of 126
Re: May '07 Car and Driver Comparison [love2driveinct] by upstatedoc
Jan 09, 2008 (6:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: love2driveinct (Jan 09, 2008 6:26 am)

There are two major things (IMO) to consider between those three vehicles with regards to your situation (fairly large family). I have an '07 MDX and it will comfortably hold 7 people with 2 of them being children in the rumble seat. And there is still room for some stuff behind the third row. I don't know if you could say that about the XC90 or the X5. The second is reliability. The Volvo's has been atrocious with the X5 not far behind. This second gen MDX will surely have superior reliability compared to those two. Well I guess there's three things, price. The MDX will be 5-7k less when comparably equipped.

Messages Page 8 of 13
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement