Sign In Join 



Acura MDX vs BMW X5

126 messages,  Last post on Jun 08, 2009 at 12:20 PM

You are in the Acura MDX Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Acura MDX, BMW X5, SUV


Messages Page 12 of 13
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#107 of 126
Which is more FUN to drive? by love2driveinct
Feb 04, 2008 (1:15 pm)
Reply
So... I pose a question to those of you that have carefully compared the MDX and the X5... which is more fun to drive?
#108 of 126
Re: Which is more FUN to drive? [love2driveinct] by chrism124
Feb 06, 2008 (12:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: love2driveinct (Feb 04, 2008 1:15 pm)

love2driveinct, I have test driven the X5 3.0si without the sport pkg and an MDX Sport. Based on this comparison, overall I like the drive of the BMW. This was based on the overall experience including brake feel, steering, body roll and driver comfort.
 
If driving and styling were the only two factors, the X5 would be my first choice. However I need an SUV that can carry 2 adults, 2 children and 1 dog plus cargo. Now other factors such as cargo space, 3rd row seat access and price become a factor.
 
I like the overall design and materials used in the X5 over the MDX. However it is worth another $8k for this? For some it may but I need the cargo space which the X5 simply doesn’t have.
 
Regards,
NHman
#109 of 126
Re: Which is more FUN to drive? [chrism124] by love2driveinct
Feb 13, 2008 (12:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chrism124 (Feb 06, 2008 12:58 pm)

Thanks NHman.
 
We need space for 3 children and no dogs. (We do have 2 dogs, but we don't really bring them anywhere.) If my hubby ends up with another Pilot, then we would still have a vehicle with a bit more cargo space. He implied that he was willing to "sacrifice" and get another Pilot (great deals right now), if our family vehicle was a bit more fun than the MDX we currently have. My top choices are the X5, XC90, and another MDX when our lease is up. And of those, I think the X5 is the only one he'd consider fun to drive. The question is, is it $8K+++ worth of fun??
#110 of 126
MDX or X5? by danil34
Feb 16, 2008 (9:03 pm)
Reply
Compared and test drove both car last week.
Tested it hard in the freeway and curves.
Went with MDX because comparably equipped is $14K cheaper and 2.9% financing and has better handling IMHO.
 
I also assume that Honda/Acura has much better resale value and far more reliable than BMW.
#111 of 126
Re: MDX or X5? [danil34] by anon3
Mar 08, 2008 (6:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: danil34 (Feb 16, 2008 9:03 pm)

Your assumption that Honda and Acura have better resale value than BMW is incorrect. Several surveys over the past few years, including JD Powers and Kelly Blue Book have ranked BMW at, or near, the top of the list for resale value. It depends on who conducted the survey and how they group vehicles into categories. But generally, BMW ranks higher than Honda/Acura for resale value. Recently, Infiniti has been hitting the number one position.
 
As for being "far more reliable" check out the MDX discussions in this forum to see the long, long list of complaints about the new MDX's reliability. Even Consumer Reports does not give the MDX its top reliability rating.
 
Look to the right of this posting under "LEARN MORE" and read the reviews of the MDX. Note the most recent post (2/15/08) about the MDX that says, "Bought this car two months ago, sport model with ent-package and other bells and whistles. Supposed to enjoy this luxury vehicle, but having nothing but troubles." Also note that consumer reviews in this forum rate the X5 higher than the MDX in 2007 and 2008.
 
In my personal experience as someone who has owned 5 X5s and 14 BMWs, I have had no significant reliability issues with any of my X5s (with the possible exception of the very first model year in 2000 when the E53 X5 was brand new to BMW.) After a year of driving the second generation E70 X5, it never went back to the shop except for scheduled maintenance, which of course was free. Not a single defect.
 
Compare that with the one Acura that I owned, which had 8 visits to the shop in the first year and several problems that could not be repaired except by trading it in. That vehicle was a nightmare and it's the reason why I switched to German cars and never looked back.
 
These forums are loaded with discussion about reliability, both good and bad, so I judge by my personal experience (which is considerable with BMW). My experience with BMW reliability has been overwhelmingly positive. You'll have to judge the MDX based on your particular experience. Hopefully, it will live up to your expectations.
#112 of 126
Re: MDX or X5? [anon3] by bmlexus
Mar 08, 2008 (8:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: anon3 (Mar 08, 2008 6:53 am)

In my personal experience as someone who has owned 5 X5s and 14 BMWs, I have had no significant reliability issues with any of my X5s (with the possible exception of the very first model year in 2000 when the E53 X5 was brand new to BMW.) After a year of driving the second generation E70 X5, it never went back to the shop except for scheduled maintenance, which of course was free. Not a single defect.
 
Wow thats a lot of experience with 14 bmw.
 
but u did get rid of ur current x5 rite?
 
U had no significant reliability issues means there were some issues?
 
Since u owned so many bmw never tried getting a lexus?
 
lately i heard that lexus electronic is better than bmw and much more refreshing
 
any comments?
#113 of 126
Re: MDX or X5? [bmlexus] by anon3
Mar 19, 2008 (10:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: bmlexus (Mar 08, 2008 8:07 am)

As I said in my post, "After a year of driving the second generation E70 X5, it never went back to the shop except for scheduled maintenance, which of course was free. Not a single defect."
 
I traded out of my most recent X5 after one year because I get a new vehicle every year and I wanted to try something different. I did not trade it because I was unhappy with it.
 
I have driven many Lexus vehicles over the years and hated the driving experience, suspension, seats, and the steering column made of rubber. I also fundamentally object to paying luxury vehicle prices for a car that was built from parts that are designed to be cost effective in a $25,000 Camry. I would never, ever buy a Lexus even though the Mark Levinson stereo is superior and Toyota electronics are easier to use.
#114 of 126
Re: MDX or X5? [anon3] by praz
Mar 19, 2008 (12:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: anon3 (Mar 19, 2008 10:35 am)

I agree with Anon that parts on Lexus are from Camry but not all parts. Also, not all Lexus vehicles are built on Camry, some are. For discussion purpose, let us consider 2007 Camry and 2007 ES. Apart from engine and transmission, I don't see many parts being common including the sheet metal and design. Seriously, how many of you will check the materials on parts? All that matters is reliability, comfort ride, luxury and fuel economy. People buy Lexus because they can afford extra money for prestige and at the same time have the advantage of replacing parts that are not expensive which means less maintenance costs. Going by numbers, RX (6th year model) sold more than 100,000 units last year and ES sold close to 85,000 units and these numbers are high for luxury vehicles that are built on $25,000 cost effective platform. Lexus, Acura, Infiniti, BMW, Audi, Benz and other manufacturers build good vehicles but all depends on one's taste.
#115 of 126
BMW X5...vs Land Cruiser? by bcb1
Mar 25, 2008 (4:23 am)
Reply
Sorry but there isn't much activity on the "regular" X5 forum (not since last December!), so I thought I might get an answer here. I've always owned large SUV's. My current one is a Yukon that I bought new in 2000 and has been very reliable and trouble-free, even with 150K miles on it.
 
I'm itchy to buy a new (used) SUV and the X5 intrigues me. My wife drove one at Carmax and fell in love with it. I had been leaning towards a Toyota Land Cruiser or Sequoia, but now I'm wondering about the X5.
 
So I'd be interested in hearing from anyone that owns an X5, mostly about their reliability, annoyances, positive features, etc. If it makes any difference, I'd probably go with the 2003 model year, 3.0 engine.
#116 of 126
Re: BMW X5...vs Land Cruiser? [bcb1] by kkelly2
Mar 25, 2008 (5:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: bcb1 (Mar 25, 2008 4:23 am)

In December we traded in our 2000 Landcruiser for a 2008 X5 3.0. If it were not for the > $70k price tag and the 3rd row that doesn't fold flat, I would have definitely gone for another Landcruiser. In the 8 years we had it, we never had one problem. But I wanted to upgrade safety features, get a nav and sat. radio and especially increase the mpg. Our search was limited b/c we need a 3rd row for carpooling the kids. As it turns out, I absolutely love my X5. Handling is great. The one-knob technology system (nav, audio, etc) is significantly better than the competition (my husband has an Acura and it's terrible). The 3rd row is tight, but works for the kids. And so far I'm getting over 17mpg with virtually no highway driving (Landcruiser was closer to 11). So no complaints - it's great. Can't speak to the '03, but I'd go for '08 if you can swing it.

Messages Page 12 of 13
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement