Sign In Join 



2008 Cadillac CTS

2757 messages,  Last post on Oct 09, 2009 at 8:13 PM

You are in the Cadillac CTS/CTS-V Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Cadillac CTS-V, Cadillac CTS, Sedan


Messages Page 4 of 276
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
276
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#31 of 2757
Early launch for 08 CTS? by pearl
Oct 30, 2006 (5:45 am)
Reply
Stopped in at my local Caddy dealer over the weekend and the sales rep said that they are expecting to see the 08 CTS out early, probably late Spring. I think this would be great. Anyone else hearing anything more definitive on this?
#32 of 2757
Re: Early launch for 08 CTS? [pearl] by sevenfeet0
Oct 31, 2006 (12:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pearl (Oct 30, 2006 5:45 am)

An early launch wouldn't be surprising. The CTS's original 2003 year launched in January, and ever since the next model year has appeared in Early June at the dealers.
#33 of 2757
Re: Early launch for 08 CTS? [sevenfeet0] by chrisl0
Oct 31, 2006 (12:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sevenfeet0 (Oct 31, 2006 12:26 pm)

If thats true why are pictures and information so hard to find? I can't even build one.
#34 of 2757
Question re Navigation package... by pearl
Nov 03, 2006 (6:00 pm)
Reply
does anyone have experience with the Caddy Nav vs. others from Japanese or German makes? Comments? My next car will have a nav for sure, but while there are tons of comments on German vs. Japanese Navs (e.g. I-drive vs. Lexus Gen 5, etc), I rarely ever hear anyone talk about American Navs, in particular, Cadillac's.
#35 of 2757
Re: Question re Navigation package... [pearl] by rockylee
Nov 03, 2006 (7:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pearl (Nov 03, 2006 6:00 pm)

The Caddy navigations are about as user friendly as Acura's. The STS, Escalade, have voice recognition technology which speeds up certain functions. I'd assume the 08' CTS will finally feature this technology, along with alot more competitive advances. If the 08' CTS, gets enough technology, I will more than likely park one in my driveway/garage.
 
Rocky
#36 of 2757
The good thing.... by rockylee
Nov 09, 2006 (7:54 pm)
Reply
We are finally starting to see news trickel out about this car. So far I see nothing but a winner and a much bigger sales success than the last CTS and CTS-V.
 
Rocky
#37 of 2757
Detroit Show Preview: Cadillac Confirms Debut of '08 CTS by rockylee
Nov 09, 2006 (8:23 pm)
Reply
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=117476
 
Rocky
#38 of 2757
Re: The good thing.... [rockylee] by pearl
Nov 09, 2006 (8:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rockylee (Nov 09, 2006 7:54 pm)

Cadillac clearly has a chance to hit a homerun here. They absolutely MUST not screw this up by letting the bean counters run the show and forcing the engineers to give up things which are already standard on the competition (e.g. tilt/telescopic steering columns; high quality "feel" on internal switches, knobs, etc; fit/finish). If this costs a few hundreds bucks more - DO IT. More people will buy a true luxo car than one that pretends to be one, but skimps on the basics.
#39 of 2757
Re: The good thing.... [pearl] by rockylee
Nov 09, 2006 (9:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pearl (Nov 09, 2006 8:42 pm)

Pearl, I 100% agree even a few thousand more they could get away with it.
 
There is no reason why this car shouldn't have a powerful DVD-Audio surround sound system, heated+ ventilated(AC) seats, pwr tilt/telescoping wheel, multi adjustment seats w/ pwr lumbar, voice recognition that controls the audio, climate, bluetooth, navigation system, adaptive cruise control, and IMHO they need to use the swivel headlamps. A pre-collison system along with the latest advances in braking technology that pre-charge the brakes for emergency stops. A rear view camera along with sensors would also be nice. TYou are right the bean counters need to stay away from this one. However, if Cadillac even just had the same technology found in the Lincoln MKZ along with voice recognition I'd be plenty happy. I guess the CTS, is the most important model but I'd expect 310 or better hp. Personally I'd like to see GM use the Buick Velite & GNX concept's 3.6 Twin Turbo that achieved 450 hp. However the 7.0 V-8 will do plenty fine in a CTS-V. I'm just saying a V-8 isn't neccessary when you add a couple of turbos to a V-6 which yields better mpg and saves weight. If GM, was very smart like I'd be with this model I'd add the 2-stage hybrid package to this car which would help further balance the car out and keep weight as close as possible to 50/50.
 
Okay pearl I'm done rambling pal. I think we can agree most of the time on this topic. I'm getting excited to see the final piece since the all-new 2008-2009 CTS-V is at the top of my short-list of 11-ars.
 
Rocky
#40 of 2757
Re: The good thing.... [rockylee] by bhill2
Nov 10, 2006 (12:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rockylee (Nov 09, 2006 9:22 pm)

I agree that GM has to put all the features into the car, but further they have to improve the materials. The first bean-counter who says "this switch has been used in millions of Chevys and Pontiacs, and is plenty good enough for this car" or "this is the material that we have used for the consoles in millions of Chevys and Pontiacs, and is plenty good enough for this car" should be shot, and their head put on a fencepost where it can be seen by all of the other bean-counters. I drove a new STS last weekend. It is a very good-driving car, but I could look around the interior and see every such compromise made in the name of cost cutting. It was an ugly sight.

Messages Page 4 of 276
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
276
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement