Sign In Join 



2008 Cadillac CTS

2757 messages,  Last post on Oct 09, 2009 at 8:13 PM

You are in the Cadillac CTS/CTS-V Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Cadillac CTS-V, Cadillac CTS, Sedan


Messages Page 206 of 276
1
...
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
...
276
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2049 of 2757
Re: Bad Caddy [rcantwell] by rvoth
Jan 31, 2008 (4:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rcantwell (Jan 30, 2008 4:58 pm)

I feel your pain about the engine . I know a GM mechanic who has been in the business over twenty five years . He has told me that when these engine and heads are produced at such a mass production pace that it's common to get hairline cracks , around 30-35% are defective. The problems usually will shows up in the first couple of years not right away like yours.
   I agree that the mech's are very genuine and will do their best in repairing the problem . They are the true customer service, not the B.S. and partial truth the service center tells you.
#2050 of 2757
Re: Bad Caddy [rvoth] by tntmyth
Jan 31, 2008 (8:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rvoth (Jan 31, 2008 4:31 pm)

30-35% of the engines have hairline cracks? Wow! If true, that's ridiculous. How can a third of the cars coming off a line be ready to break in the first couple years? I don't see how they could stay in business.
I was reading the lastest reviews here on Edmunds for the 2008 Cadillac CTS. One of the comments was the the "front seat cushions should be longer". I was kind of thinking the same thing when I sat inside one. Interesting that I read that here in a review. For those of you that have already purchased the 2008 CTS, do you feel or did the thought ever cross your mind that the front seat cushions seemed a little short?
#2051 of 2757
Re: Bad Caddy [rvoth] by jkr2106
Jan 31, 2008 (8:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rvoth (Jan 31, 2008 4:31 pm)

around 30-35% are defective
 
I don't doubt that a mechanic would say that, but c'mon--that's absurd! As a mechanic he probably only sees problemed cars, so I think he has a bit of an adverse sample selection bias.
 
The problems usually will shows up in the first couple of years...
 
So, in the first 2-4 years a full third of GMs engines will fail? Yeah...I'd take that percentage with a boatload of salt.
#2052 of 2757
Re: Bad Caddy [tntmyth] by psdesertrat
Jan 31, 2008 (10:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tntmyth (Jan 31, 2008 8:00 pm)

I traded my 06 STS for the new CTS. I found at first the seats were short for my longer legs, I'm 6'2". It was a serious consideration before buying the car. So, I would get in and out of each car a number of times and spent quite some time just sitting in it. What I figure is that with every car there are compromises.
 
I've now driven my CTS on a 450 mile trip, one way. My body has adjusted to the difference in seats, and I find the car quite comfortable on longer trips. I also realized that the entertainment I have with my CTS far outweighs the seat length.
 
My AWD has every option. I had a blast in the Idyllwild snow a couple of weeks ago, and felt very secure in the worst of weather which confirmed my suspicion that this was the best decision I made.
 
Take the time, drive the BMW and Audi. The seats are a little better, but try to figure out how to turn the radio off without having to read a book.....
 
Good Luck!
#2053 of 2757
Re: Bad Caddy [rvoth] by 150mphclub
Feb 01, 2008 (6:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: rvoth (Jan 31, 2008 4:31 pm)

"around 30-35% are defective"
 
Ridiculous assertion. No manufacturer of any product with a defect rate like that could survive in today's competitive environment.
#2054 of 2757
It's All in How. . . by cdnpinhead
Feb 01, 2008 (6:40 am)
Reply
casting "defects" are defined.
 
All castings have defects, but only a very few slip through the inspection & classification processes meant to eliminate the ones that will actually fail in service. It's not too far-fetched to posit that 30-35% of automotive castings have surface indications of one size or another. So long as the defects aren't linear & beyond the length that experience has shown could allow them to grow into something significant, it's no harm/no foul.
 
Something like what the meaning of "is" is. There are defects and then there are rejectable defects.
#2055 of 2757
Re: Bad Caddy [150mphclub] by adnanz
Feb 01, 2008 (6:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: 150mphclub (Feb 01, 2008 6:04 am)

I highly doubt 1/3 of engines being rolled off the assembly line are defective. That is a gross exaggeration. With every manufacturer, there are manufacturing issues, some more, some less. I agree, no way a company can survive by selling 1/3 crappy engines. I'm sure the number of bad engines are more like 1%, if not less. Unless the engines are flawed, which I doubt.
#2057 of 2757
Re: Bad Caddy [rcantwell] by rcantwell
Feb 01, 2008 (12:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rcantwell (Jan 30, 2008 4:58 pm)

Engine update Friday Feb 1st. Basically I still don't know anything.They have the engine torn apart and can see where the dye/water is getting in one of the cylinders. Problem is they don't know how it is getting there. No visible cracks in the head, block, or head gasket. They have the head at the machine shop now checking it out, but the service manager told me he doubts they will find anything. The dye should have shown a crack if there was one. His best guess is that the block casting is porus letting the water in that way. He is working with Cadillac technical services, trying to get authorization for a new engine, what I wanted in the first place. It's been in the shop for 8 days this time and he admitted Caddy probably wouldn't make a decision till Monday at the earliest. That means with shipping time for hopefuly the new engine, and disassembly, reassembly and installation, I am looking at it being in the shop for another week to week and a half. That probably puts me up to about 26 days or so in the shop since the first of the year. Oh, I forgot!! Caddy offered me a free oil change. At least this time the rental isn't a Cobalt, the Grand Prix while no Caddy is certainly much better than a Cobalt. With rental car fees, all the problems the first time in the shop, and now the engine, I can take solace that GM hasn't made a penny on this vehicle. Too bad they just don't get me a new one, or money back, and take this lemon to Detroit to study how NOT to build a car.
#2058 of 2757
Re: Bad Caddy [tntmyth] by 150mphclub
Feb 01, 2008 (5:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tntmyth (Jan 29, 2008 8:20 pm)

"The first time, Lexus gave him a new car. The second time, they gave him his money back and he went and bought an Acura TL. That's the legendary Lexus customer service and it's why Lexus has a loyal customer base."
 
Apparently not too loyal, since he went out and bought an Acura.

Messages Page 206 of 276
1
...
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
...
276
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement