Sign In Join 



Luxury Lounge

21518 messages,  Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 10:07 AM

You are in the BMW 7-Series Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, Volvo, Porsche, Jaguar, Audi, Maserati, Maybach, Car Comparisons, Coupe, Convertible, Sedan


Messages Page 2123 of 2153
1
...
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
...
2153
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#21216 of 21518
Re: Status quo, yet so different... [dewey] by anthonyp
Oct 29, 2009 (6:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dewey (Oct 29, 2009 2:58 pm)

Hi Dewey
 
Back in 67 we didn`t really care that much about the drive, as no one I knew had any money to spare on fancy cars.....Now if we did, if would be for a Parsche, and as you know it certainly wasn`t plush......Sorry you missed the discouraged financial opinions recently, as you know you could have made some good points---oh well all in the past......Tony
#21217 of 21518
White House, Ford, Auto Nation, and others all disagree with Edmunds by tagman
Oct 29, 2009 (8:02 pm)
Reply
This... according to the White House...
 
Edmunds.com's "faulty analysis suggesting that the cash for clunkers program had no meaningful impact on our economy or on overall auto sales. This is the latest of several critical 'analyses' of the cash for clunkers program from Edmunds.com, which appear designed to grab headlines and get coverage on cable TV," the White House said on its blog Thursday afternoon. "Like many of their previous attempts, this latest claim doesn't withstand even basic scrutiny."
 
This... according to Mike Jackson, chairman and CEO of AutoNation...
 
While Edmunds is usually highly respected within the automotive industry for its accuracy and reliability, he said, its analysis of the cash for clunkers program is "shoddy."
 
"Simply put, they've misrepresented the facts, and the White House is completely justified in calling them out on it," Jackson said, adding that it appears "Edmunds' political views have tainted their usual rigorous approach to research."
 
"I know from our sales at AutoNation just how significant the impact of the cash for clunkers promotion was in our dealerships, and our own internal figures indicate that the rate of increase was consistent with what other retailers, manufacturers and governmental agencies have been estimating," he said.
 
"We believe that the incremental sales are over 500,000 new vehicles. Edmunds may not want to believe Ford or General Motors or Moody's or the White House or any of the dozens of other reliable parties who saw significant sales increases as a direct and indirect result of the program, but that doesn't make the increases any less real."

 
Sounds like Edmunds and Edmunds CEO Jeremy Anwyl are in a bit of a pickle on this one. You guys can decide for yourself. Here's the link. link title
 
TM
#21218 of 21518
2010 Audi S4 400 HP by skarie
Oct 30, 2009 (5:11 am)
Reply
Evidence mounting that 2010 Audi S4 is underrated
 
Everyone knows that the BMW 335i is the most underrated car currently on the market in terms of raw thrust and grunt. BMW claims 300 hp and 300 torques, but even dogs know that BMW's trick 3.0-liter twin-turbo engine puts out much closer to 350 hp and 350 tire-spinning pound feet of torque. Why? Well, lower insurance rates for their customers probably isn't one of the reasons. However, remember that when the E90/E92 3 Series came out, BMW was still selling the 333 horsepower E46 M3. Meaning that it would be pretty hard to sell an older, $55,000 car with less power than a newer and just as quick $40,000 car. Or so the theory goes, though we should point out that BMW engineers angrily call us liars when we bring this scenario up.
 
And guess what? Looks like Audi is pulling the same trick with their new supercharged S4. Volkswagen and Audi tuner APR stuck a 2010 Audi S4 on an AWD-dyno and discovered the following. Instead of the 333 hp and 325 torques Audi is claiming, they pulled 331 hp and 336 pound-feet of torque... at the wheels! Figuring that AWD cars have about a 20% parasitic drivetrain power loss, the actual crank output of the S4 is huge. How huge? By our calculations just about 400 horsepower/torques.
link title
#21219 of 21518
How about this Investment idea ? buying an LFA by 2001gs430
Oct 30, 2009 (6:29 am)
Reply
I think this post should be allowed since it's related to one of the luxury marques
I've just read that the entire production run of the LFA will be just 500 cars. So, this car is already a classic even before they make them. It should at least double in value by the time people can actually buy them off the leases.
link title
Scrap that real estate investment idea... I am ready with my deposit. I hope they will save a copy for me.
#21220 of 21518
Re: White House, Ford, Auto Nation, and others all disagree with Edmunds [tagman] by circlew
Oct 30, 2009 (7:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Oct 29, 2009 8:02 pm)

Jeremy A. is in a pickle sandwich afaic when he stated we should be raising gasoline taxes to incent buying fuel efficient vehicles. He's been on my "S" list from then on.
 
No surprise that Edmunds has changed over the years but some aspects of the changes do NOT produce accurate analysis. The feel of the site has faded recently from my POV.
 
As far as posting off topic comments, there was a time when Luxury Lounge included all things of luxury including the financial world which leads to the means to squire Luxury vehicles in the first place. The strictness lately has reflected some of the junk that is flowing down hill from the Executive Suite, no doubt.
 
Regards,
OW
#21221 of 21518
Re: White House, Ford, Auto Nation, and others all disagree with Edmunds [circlew] by 2001gs430
Oct 30, 2009 (9:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Oct 30, 2009 7:37 am)

I am with you. This is the only car forum I found interesting for what it was.
#21222 of 21518
Sigh... by m4d_cow
Oct 30, 2009 (9:42 am)
Reply
a month of hiatus and I missed all the good stuff
#21223 of 21518
Cadillac CTS-V Race Results by tagman
Oct 30, 2009 (10:11 am)
Reply
These are what seems to be the "final" standings. If so, an Audi RS-4 placed 11th.
 
1. Cadillac CTS-V (John Heinricy): 2:46:560
2. Cadillac CTS-V (Brian Redman): 2:49:183
3. Cadillac CTS-V (Aaron Link): 2:48:902
4. BMW M3 (Michael Cooper): 2.50:424
5. Cadillac CTS-V (Jack Baruth): 2:51:153
6. Cadillac CTS-V (Lawrence Ulrich): 2:53:026
7. Cadillac CTS-V (Bob Lutz): 2:56:321
8. Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X (Wes Siler): 3:08.126
9. BMW M5 (Michael Mainwald): 3:08:989
10. Cadillac CTS-V (Chris Fairman.): 3:14:292
11. Audi RS4 (Tom Loder): 3:15:702
12. Jaguar XF (Archan Basu): 3:16.670
 
I believe that these these standings were not quite final...
So, the Audi and Jaguar changed positions.
 

 
No matter what... the Caddy certainly showed its stuff. Not a bad showing for one of my favorites... the BMW M3.
 
TM
#21224 of 21518
Re: Cadillac CTS-V Race Results [tagman] by jlbl
Oct 30, 2009 (10:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Oct 30, 2009 10:11 am)

So, as for my betting…
 
 
Seriously, it seems there was quite a big gap between the first and the 12th classified; not so between the first and the 6th.
 
Regards,
Jose
#21225 of 21518
Re: Cadillac CTS-V Race Results [jlbl] by tagman
Oct 30, 2009 (10:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: jlbl (Oct 30, 2009 10:40 am)

I am personally taking all these results with a big grain of salt.
 
But, the main point has been made, regardless... The cadillac CTS-V is indeed a formidable vehicle with plenty of clout that deserves respect... perhaps more than it gets from certain circles.
 
TM

Messages Page 2123 of 2153
1
...
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
...
2153
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement