Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Luxury Lounge
21520 messages, Last post on Dec 08, 2009 at 10:26 AM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: tagman (Oct 29, 2009 8:02 pm) No surprise that Edmunds has changed over the years but some aspects of the changes do NOT produce accurate analysis. The feel of the site has faded recently from my POV. As far as posting off topic comments, there was a time when Luxury Lounge included all things of luxury including the financial world which leads to the means to squire Luxury vehicles in the first place. The strictness lately has reflected some of the junk that is flowing down hill from the Executive Suite, no doubt.  Regards, OW
|
|
|
Replying to: circlew (Oct 30, 2009 7:37 am) |
|
a month of hiatus and I missed all the good stuff 
|
|
|
These are what seems to be the "final" standings. If so, an Audi RS-4 placed 11th. 1. Cadillac CTS-V (John Heinricy): 2:46:560 2. Cadillac CTS-V (Brian Redman): 2:49:183 3. Cadillac CTS-V (Aaron Link): 2:48:902 4. BMW M3 (Michael Cooper): 2.50:424 5. Cadillac CTS-V (Jack Baruth): 2:51:153 6. Cadillac CTS-V (Lawrence Ulrich): 2:53:026 7. Cadillac CTS-V (Bob Lutz): 2:56:321 8. Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X (Wes Siler): 3:08.126 9. BMW M5 (Michael Mainwald): 3:08:989 10. Cadillac CTS-V (Chris Fairman.): 3:14:292 11. Audi RS4 (Tom Loder): 3:15:702 12. Jaguar XF (Archan Basu): 3:16.670 I believe that these these standings were not quite final... So, the Audi and Jaguar changed positions.  No matter what... the Caddy certainly showed its stuff. Not a bad showing for one of my favorites... the BMW M3. TM |
|
|
Replying to: tagman (Oct 30, 2009 10:11 am)  Seriously, it seems there was quite a big gap between the first and the 12th classified; not so between the first and the 6th. Regards, Jose
|
|
|
Replying to: jlbl (Oct 30, 2009 10:40 am) But, the main point has been made, regardless... The cadillac CTS-V is indeed a formidable vehicle with plenty of clout that deserves respect... perhaps more than it gets from certain circles. TM
|
|
|
Replying to: tagman (Oct 30, 2009 10:51 am) I am still not convinced that GM's Cadillac is a world class elite car manufacturer by a wide margin. Also, when it comes to the full package, the list changes drastically in my view. Regards, OW |
|
|
Hi I was wondering if you were really serious with the Mercedes, and now see you have re thought that position...I agree with you, as I really don`t think the Mercedes would excite you at all..Just too big...I was thinking of the diesel e, and dropped that idea also, although I do think the e is an attractive car, and think Mercedes is doing the right thing to offer the higher grade options if a person were to desire them.....Tony
|
|
|
Replying to: 2001gs430 (Oct 30, 2009 6:29 am) Who has a passion for Lexus technology and Lexus engineering? Dentists. |
|
|
Replying to: tagman (Oct 30, 2009 10:11 am) Technically the M3 won. The contest was "you come with whatever sedan you want and try to beat Bob Lutz in a CTS-V." Mr. Cooper did just that in his M3. The contest was never about beating Cadillac engineers and test drivers. I suspect if Motorsport actually got involved and brought their own engineers and test drivers, the M3 may well have been at the top of the board. In any case it succeeds at what it was always designed to be, a PR stunt for Cadillac. The CTS-V is an impressive machine, no doubt about that, but I wonder how long the whole V series will continue to exist when faced with the reality of the business. Based on Nurburgring times the CTS-V is the fastest thing with 4 doors short of a Panamera Turbo, but unlike GM, the Germans still have some money, and will continue to improve their cars.
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
