Sign In Join 



2008 Pontiac G8

1265 messages,  Last post on Jul 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM

You are in the Pontiac G8 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Pontiac Grand Prix, Pontiac G8, Future Vehicle, Sedan


Messages Page 53 of 127
1
...
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
...
127
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#518 of 1265
Re: diesel Re: TQ Re: G8 vs comp [mr215] by captain2
Jan 22, 2008 (11:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: mr215 (Jan 22, 2008 6:08 am)

It competes with the G8 on some level but its not a sports sedan
how do you suppose that Hyundai can market the Genesis as a low cost alternative to things like those German sedans - and not be a 'sports sedan' ? If anything I would guess that the Korean car might just do a better job at 'sport sedan emulation' then GM would in a full size Pontiac. A simple comparison of the specs. confirms this - but some actual cars would definitely help.
And absolutely, $40k is more than anybody is going to want to spend on something with that 'Hyundai' label which is why some traditional Korean deep discounting, PDQ. Both the G8 and Genesis may actually fetch a reasonably high price initially - but once the novelty wears thin and the reality of $4 gas hits, they will end up having to 'give' the cars away.....
#519 of 1265
seat adj Re: Navi? [qbrozen] by rayainsw
Jan 22, 2008 (11:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jan 22, 2008 10:00 am)

“How do you know this? Is this a standard chevy thing?
  
I thought it read "6-way" seat. Meaning there IS NO 8th adjustment, not that there is an 8th adjustment but its just manual.”
 
FWIW: The specs for the 2007 Corvette, both standard & optional ‘sport’ seats, read: 6-way [ power].
 
They move for \ aft as well as front or rear of seat bottom up \ down individually – but the backrest angle is ‘manual’.
 
I’d be pretty amazed if the G8 didn’t have the ability to move the seat bottom front & rear \ angle in the same way.
 
And that would absolutely be a ‘deal breaker’ for me. Though I am not as tall, I do need that adjustability to vary thigh support – particularly on longer trips.
 
Again, FWIW.
 
- Ray
Not quite near enough to the NAIAS to visit on a whim, just to find this out . . .
#520 of 1265
Re: seat adj Re: Navi? [rayainsw] by qbrozen
Jan 22, 2008 (1:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rayainsw (Jan 22, 2008 11:50 am)

I'll be going to the NAIAS in NY, but that's a ways off still.
 
I wonder if they'll have one to actually sit in.
#521 of 1265
Re: seat adj Re: Navi? [qbrozen] by bigelm
Jan 22, 2008 (1:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jan 22, 2008 1:08 pm)

Rumor has it that GM will offer bluetooth and Nav for MY09. The issue with bluetooth is that they are having issues with their On Star and the Nav is because they offer a 'similar' feature with turn by turn On Star as well (so they say).
 
Back to comparisons, I only see very few similarities for competition between the Genesis and G8. More luxury vs. more performance. Hyundai has already mentioned that they are targeting this vehicle as the halo luxury model. Yes, it needs the HP output to compete but performance is not their intended market. Will people cross shop? YES!
#522 of 1265
Re: seat adj Re: Navi? [bigelm] by paisan
Jan 22, 2008 (4:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bigelm (Jan 22, 2008 1:55 pm)

I think that the Genesis will be tuned much more for luxury than the G8. The suspension will be softer and floatier, and the NVH significantly better. These are the things that folks who are shopping luxury look for. The G8 (hopefully) will have a significantly stiffer suspension, and thus better handling.
 
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
#523 of 1265
# of ways, power seat by elias
Jan 22, 2008 (5:30 pm)
Reply
the GTO-naro driver & passenger seat each have power-recline so i bet the G8's will too.
#524 of 1265
Re: # of ways, power seat [elias] by bigelm
Jan 22, 2008 (8:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: elias (Jan 22, 2008 5:30 pm)

The seats are 6 way power (optional) which means you get Fwd-Rear, Front up/dwn, and rear up/dwn with a manual recline. The heat switch is in the center console.
 
This is quoted from someone who was at the NAIAS prior to public showing. So Mike, I believe you mentioned this setup on the Corvette? - Then you're right. There's also a pic where the rear armrest comes down, then the second membrane for cup holders - problem is when you use the cup holders, the pass thru is open which your rear passengers can access your trunk. If things are not tied down back there, then you're in for a treat.
 
I found the pics:
 
http://www.hammen.net/bowman/rear_armrest.jpg
 
http://www.hammen.net/bowman/pass_thru.jpg
#525 of 1265
Re: diesel Re: TQ Re: G8 vs comp [captain2] by mr215
Jan 23, 2008 (8:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Jan 22, 2008 11:29 am)

The two cars are not aimed at the same market. No one here thinks that except you apparently. The Hyundai is supposed to be a cheaper version of the S or LS, its not a 550 competitor. If you know anything about Hyundais you know they tend to skew towards ride over handling. They are more interested in gunning for Toyota than BMW. As for gas prices, both cars offer V6 engines so its not like they can only be had with gas guzzling V8s. Furthermore, if you actually look at the mileage on the G8 Gt you will see its only slightly worse than the G35. Do you think G35 sales will collapse when gas gets more expensive? There are a number of V6 luxury cars that get 1-2 better mileage than the G8 GT with far less power and torque.
#526 of 1265
MPG Infiniti G & M by rayainsw
Jan 23, 2008 (9:27 am)
Reply
One can certainly choose to compare anything to anything, I suppose.
 
Regarding my reading of the EPA MPG, comparing the G8 GT w/6.0L V8 to a G35 w/3.5L V6 seems somewhat unfair, to me, given the existence of the M45. Much closer in weight & in HP & in performance. ( And fuel economy I see as one aspect of ‘performance’. )
 
And yet, the G35 is rated at exactly the same EPA highway MPG as the G8 GT V8. 24 MPG. And the M45 is rated at 16 \ 21.
 
That 21 number ( and associated high RPM at highway speeds ) is one primary reason that I did not choose an M45 last time I was shopping for a Sports Sedan. Though ( again ) the M certainly has much to recommend it.
 
And I see the highway number as much more important. Stop + go, lower speed driving, with lots of ( opportunities for ) acceleration tends to be an area where the nut that holds the wheel has much more occasion to [ dramatically ] impact actual MPG.
 
Many ( including some here ) have suggested that anyone looking at a 4,000# sedan with a 6.0L V8 cannot possibly be ( should not be ) concerned with MPG. I do happen to care. In addition to a desire for what I consider a reasonable trade-off between acceleration performance, carrying capacity & efficiency, I also look at driving range.
 
To me, a difference of 21 to 24 ( 3 MPG = over 14% better ) in highway MPG is also the difference of over 50 miles in range, on 18 gallons of gas. ( To be fair here, the M45 does have a 20 gallon tank vs. 19 for the G8 – so if you run both leaving approx. 1 gallon ‘in reserve’, the G8 will only be able to travel an additional 33 miles. But the M45 will then require an additional 2 or 3 cups of hot & tasty coffee worth of gas when filled. Each time it is filled, under these conditions. )
 
- Ray
Looking forward to fuel use reports from actual customers in actual driving . . . Maybe next month?
#527 of 1265
test by mr215
Jan 24, 2008 (11:10 am)
Reply
G8 will be in next issue of C&D.

Messages Page 53 of 127
1
...
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
...
127
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement