Sign In Join


2008 Pontiac G8

1248 messages,  Last post on Jul 02, 2009 at 9:31 AM

You are in the Pontiac G8 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Pontiac Grand Prix, Pontiac G8, Future Vehicle, Sedan


Messages Page 15 of 126
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
126
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#133 of 1248
G8 thoughts..... by rayainsw
Feb 14, 2007 (10:03 am)
Reply
First, by raising the issue ( for me ) of the apparent near 4,000 pound weight of the G8 V8, I mean no disrespect to GM \ Pontiac , nor do I mean to ignore or “gloss over” the fact that they will be bringing to market something with features & specifications that many, many here & elsewhere have been asking for – for quite a long time:
 
For example:
RWD
V8
6-Speed Manual trans. available
 
I think that this G8 marks quite an important product and an important time for Pontiac & for GM. I find it hard to judge the aesthetics without seeing one in person, but I am encouraged by what I have seen & read so far.
 
( I expect that the show car will be here in Atlanta for this year’s auto show, March 10 – 18, so I may have an opportunity then. Though of course it is likely to be stuck up on a turntable with a ‘spokesmodel’ – sigh. )
 
If I was going to seriously consider buying one early next year ( I’m not ), I’d prefer the HUD. I have had it in 2 Grand Prix-s and now in my Corvette. I would also prefer a lighter curb weight. But neither may end up being a ‘deal-breaker’, come decision time.
 
OTOH: With the gearing quoted, I expect that a MN6 version of the V8 maybe capable of mid-13s. And the 6L80 \ manumatic, with a somewhat more aggressive final drive than is in my A6 Corvette, might also manage something close to that – maybe high 13s. Reasonably quick, for a 4DR sedan of this size expected to carry an MSRP in the mid-30s.
 
( 2.92:1 final drive vs 2.56:1 in the Corvette A6 = approx. 14% more ‘dig’ \ mechanical advantage – against approx. 21% more weight for the G8. )
 
If I do seriously consider one, it will likely be a 2009 or a 2010 – and at least 2 years from now. ) Did I hear from Bob L. say in some interview that the G8 will be sold here starting just after the beginning of 2008 – as a 2009? ) Anyway, we’ll se what changes that second Model Year brings. And where it is assembled. Etc.
 
Point here is that while I generally agree with several criticisms here leveled at the specifications released so far – I hope that they are not taken to mean that I don’t respect the fact that GM \ Pontiac is bringing this car to market in NA. I am optimistic. The fact that they are bringing to market what looks like a worthy competitor to various other RWD V8 sedans – well, I see as a very positive step.
 
I look forward to seeing one up close.
 
And eventually driving one.
 
- Ray
Not in the market today, but a card carrying CCBA . . .
#134 of 1248
Interesting bit of... by wale_bate1
Feb 14, 2007 (11:32 am)
Reply
big "duh" here:
Lutz on chasing BMW.
 
He says they benchmarked BMW on the structure and tuning, and Audi on the interior.
 
Based on my experience with both of those brands, I would have done precisely the same. This is all hopefull.
 
Problem with GM recently though, IMO, is that while they have produced some appealing cars that certainly update their image as being real contenders, most have been also-rans in their classes and not the TKOs I think they need to take back share (G6 leaps to mind immediately). They have produced some things that are "as good as" the competition, or there abouts, and seem to want to trade on price.
 
My thought is that, for at least a stretch of five years or so, they have to produce clear class winners consistently, and trade on price as well, in order to really reverse the tide.
 
And what's with these long stretches (IMO) to market? A car based on existing architecture with major parts-bin applications and yet we won't see it until early next year? With a Camaro that won't arrive until, what, a year after that? Late August. That's what it ought to be, late August says I...
 
Remember 90's Chrysler before DCX, and their 24-month concept to showroom successes?
 
C'mon General, you're getting so close!
#135 of 1248
Re: Interesting bit of... [wale_bate1] by 1487
Feb 14, 2007 (11:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: wale_bate1 (Feb 14, 2007 11:32 am)

Camaro cant be built until the factory is retooled for Zeta production. They have to phase out products in Oshawa like the Monte Carlo and Grand Prix before they can prepare it for Camaro. Obviously they need the G8 here before they can phase out the GP completely and I've heard the GP will go out of production in December. By late 2008 the Camaro's production will begin.
 
I assume the G8 cant be sold her sooner do to crash and emissions certifications and other regulatory stuff.
#136 of 1248
Re: G8 thoughts..... [rayainsw] by rockylee
Feb 14, 2007 (1:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rayainsw (Feb 14, 2007 10:03 am)

rayainsw,
 
Sounds to me you need a 502 hp G8 GXP after the
HSV-grin That will be available probably in 2009'
 
Rocky
#137 of 1248
Re: Interesting bit of... [1487] by wale_bate1
Feb 14, 2007 (1:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 1487 (Feb 14, 2007 11:59 am)

"I assume the G8 can't be sold here sooner do to crash and emissions certifications and other regulatory stuff..."
 
I'm assuming that's a great part of the equation, but I also think there is a corporate process adding some man-hours here.
#138 of 1248
Re: Interesting bit of... [wale_bate1] by rorr
Feb 15, 2007 (12:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wale_bate1 (Feb 14, 2007 1:21 pm)

"I'm assuming that's a great part of the equation, but I also think there is a corporate process adding some man-hours here."
 
Actually, I'm assuming that's only a small part of the equation (just how different emmissions-wise is the 6.0l V8 compared to the LS2 in the old GTO?). Personally, I think the internal corporate BS process is at fault here more than anything else.
 
GM just CAN'T get new product to the market efficiently enough.
#139 of 1248
Re: Interesting bit of... [rorr] by wale_bate1
Feb 15, 2007 (12:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Feb 15, 2007 12:36 pm)

Well, I was being nice...
#140 of 1248
Re: Interesting bit of... [rorr] by paisan
Feb 15, 2007 (1:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Feb 15, 2007 12:36 pm)

Well the LS2 in the old GTO is different in that it doesn't have the MDS also each car has to be tested for safety and emissions regardless of if the engine is in a different car IIRC, especially if it has different HP and what not.
 
Also they haven't finalized the body panels yet I think. They are going to still be refining it through the summer.
 
-mike
#141 of 1248
Re: Interesting bit of... [wale_bate1] by rorr
Feb 15, 2007 (1:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wale_bate1 (Feb 15, 2007 12:51 pm)

"Well, I was being nice..."
 
Was today YOUR turn to be the 'good cop'?
#142 of 1248
Re: Interesting bit of... [paisan] by rorr
Feb 15, 2007 (1:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (Feb 15, 2007 1:10 pm)

"...also each car has to be tested for safety and emissions regardless of if the engine is in a different car IIRC, especially if it has different HP and what not."
 
Yes. They must be TESTED. But it's not like the new engine is a clean sheet of paper design. If anything, I'd imagine the MDS system would make emissions testing easier. The point isn't whether the new engine/vehicle must be tested but how LONG such testing/certification must take?
 
Particularly when other manufacturer's seem to get through the same process quicker with designs which ARE all new.....

Messages Page 15 of 126
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
126
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement