Sign In Join 



2008 Toyota Sequoia

1871 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 7:42 PM

You are in the Toyota Sequoia Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Toyota Sequoia, Future Vehicle, SUV


Messages Page 180 of 187
1
...
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
...
187
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1791 of 1871
Sequoia Road Trip by CanStacker
Dec 28, 2008 (12:55 pm)
Reply
Hi everyone,
 
My wife and I purchased a new 2008 5.7 2WD SR5 back in may. We have over 7,000 miles on it already and I think it's the best car I've ever owned.
 
We drove it, in October, 2600 miles through Oregon, Idaho, Washington State and Northern California.
 
The 5.7 engine with the 6 speed automatic never strained once throughout the trip. We averaged about 20 mpg, with a one of the tanks of fuel being wind aided that registered 24 mpg.
 
We are currently looking at a new Venza for my wife to replace her RAV 4.
 
It's a great vehicle, but for us there is no doubt the high feature V-8 and the 6 speed transmission is what sets it apart from the competition.
 
Thanks for this message board
#1792 of 1871
by xier
Dec 28, 2008 (5:16 pm)
Reply
CanStacker - thanks for sharing. I feel the same way about our 08 Platinum - although we only have 700 miles on it so far the engine/transmission is superior to vehicles in its class that I tested prior to buying the Sequoia....
#1793 of 1871
2008 SR5 tire question by gcmills
Jan 05, 2009 (11:02 am)
Reply
Please help - the stock sr5 size is 275/65 r18. the only tire i want to put on the truck is bf goodrich all terrain t/a. so do it you say......well they dont make the BF goodrich all terrain t/a tire in that size! they do make it in 285/65/ r18.
 
my question is - does anyone know if that tire will fit the truck? How can i find out?
 
Thanks in advance.
#1794 of 1871
Re: 2008 SR5 tire question [gcmills] by tee go
Jan 05, 2009 (11:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: gcmills (Jan 05, 2009 11:02 am)

The only difference is the width of the two tires...a 275 is slightly less wide than a 285. Just ask the installer...it shouldn't be a problem.
#1795 of 1871
Re: 2008 SR5 tire question [tee go] by shark715
Jan 05, 2009 (2:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tee go (Jan 05, 2009 11:25 am)

Not only is a 285 wider, it's a bit larger in diameter. Assuming it fits, that will make your speedometer read roughly 2 mph slower at expressway speeds, and when your truck has 100k miles on it, the odometer will read only about 96k (if you care) .
#1796 of 1871
Tire Chains by sirraf
Jan 11, 2009 (7:54 am)
Reply
I am looking to purchase a set of Tire Chains for my Sequoia. Does anyone have a recommended brand/type of chains? Where is the best place to purchase and the cost?
#1797 of 1871
high idle in cold weather by saramaddie
Jan 11, 2009 (9:34 pm)
Reply
I know that all cars will idle fast when first started in cold weather, but my 2008 Seq. sounds like a jet engine when I first start it. It does return to what I feel is a reasonable idle after about 10 seconds. This can't be too great for the engine can it? Does anyone else think theirs is excessively high?
#1798 of 1871
Re: Tire Chains [sirraf] by steve_ HOST
Jan 12, 2009 (8:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: sirraf (Jan 11, 2009 7:54 am)

Check your owner's manual to see if there are any recommendations on the type of chain you can use (regular chains, cable chains, Z type etc.). I suspect you have plenty of clearance for regular chains.
 
I got my last two sets at the thrift store for about $5. Expect to pay around $40 for a new set. Or more.
#1799 of 1871
Real world comments by jbm4
Jan 20, 2009 (10:58 am)
Reply
My two cents... bought a Limited w/Nav in early November to take advantage of the deals. Never owned a supersize SUV (also have an RX and sold an 01 Tundra when I bought the Sequoia) but needed the three rows for kids, dogs, gear, etc. While I would hesitate to pay $55K+ for a Sequoia, Limiteds selling in the low 40s are a steal. Briefly looked at QX45 (ugly to me) and Suburban/Escalades (hesitated on build quality and depreciation having owned GM before).
 
Pros - fit and finish, drivetrain (transmission especially), true 4WD capability (driven in deep snow up steep grades) and carrying capacity - especially the space in the second row. Smooth as butter. Touch screen navigation is great if that's what you prefer (coming out of a BMW with iDrive it's heaven).
 
Cons - fuel economy. I knew it would be bad but accepted the tradeoff, and it's bad unless you spend your time on flat highways. For the first 3000 miles, average economy 14.4 mpg, high 18.8 mpg on a couple of highway tanks and low of 9.8 for mainly 4WD snow driving. Also the width of the car can be a con for some.
#1800 of 1871
by xier
Jan 20, 2009 (12:27 pm)
Reply
JBM - your 2 cents are appreciated - I concur with your overview of the vehicle. IMO its best in class and when you add in the "deals" that are available its a great buy!

Messages Page 180 of 187
1
...
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
...
187
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement