- #101 of 151
-
Re: Hey! The CR-V won too [carfreak8]
by piast
-
Dec 10, 2006 (10:04 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: carfreak8 (Dec 09, 2006 1:31 pm)
Looks like you want to have last sentence in any discussion. Problem is you don't bring anything new with it, other that "I don't like this or that","I know people who were not impress",etc. We are not taking here about last generations of Galant, Montero, Passport, CRV or Accord. Nether of them was impressive (in BMW or Porsche performance or Lexus finish way). We are comparing 07 CUV's, their values, sizes, performance, pros and cons. Exteriors and interiors is strictly personal. So, I hope all your friends are now impressed with your new CRV. And before you judge any car, you should go out and test it, not only look at the pictures.
|
- #102 of 151
-
Re: Article Comments: [KarenS]
by joz88mon
-
Dec 10, 2006 (10:04 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: KarenS (Aug 29, 2006 4:08 am)
what a poor comparo. edmunds must've bought it from walton at a below invoice. even the ed had to overule the results.
|
- #103 of 151
-
Re: Article Comments: [joz88mon]
by srdriver
-
Dec 10, 2006 (10:12 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: joz88mon (Dec 10, 2006 10:04 am)
I got the same opinion.
|
- #104 of 151
-
Test Drive of SUVs
by srdriver
-
Dec 10, 2006 (10:15 am)
-
|
|
Have test driven several different Crossovers. I think that is the best way when shopping around + options I would want. I always buy leather seating and like at least power seats.
|
- #105 of 151
-
Re: Ford Edge Horsepower [srdriver]
by piast
-
Dec 10, 2006 (11:04 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: srdriver (Dec 10, 2006 9:28 am)
This is true, but performance numbers are not that good. Check review in DEC Motor Trend, SUV of the Year contest. It's 0-60 mph of 8.0 sec is worse than RAV4, CX7 or XL7 (Outlander 8.1 sec, Santa Fe 8.5 sec) , slalom and lateral acceleration worse than all of them including Mitsu, Santa Fe and CRV, braking 60-0 mph of 142 ft worst of all, same for fuel economy (18/23 mpg). Tod Lassa wrote: :"Santa Fe easily bests it for refinement and interior quality...its slalom, skidpad and figure 8 numbers are worse than the GMC Yukon Denali's...on-road driving experience is no day at the beach, either. The new 3.5 V6 is trashy under full throttle...The Edge doesn't have what it takes to help solve Ford's problems'
|
- #106 of 151
-
Re: Opal Antara [srdriver]
by piast
-
Dec 10, 2006 (11:18 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: srdriver (Dec 09, 2006 2:44 pm)
"The Saturn variant will be assembled in Mexico"
Can it be any more complicated? Korean designed and build Daewoo, sold as Opel Antara in Europe, will be assembled in Mexico and sold as Saturn here. How about exporting it from USA to Canada and back to Asia as Chevy.
|
- #107 of 151
-
Re: Hey! The CR-V won too [piast]
by carfreak8
-
Dec 10, 2006 (1:52 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: piast (Dec 10, 2006 10:04 am)
I was just saying what the car looked like from the pictures, and I could tell I was not interested in the Outlander. This whole point of this forum is to voice your opinion and that is what I have done. As for what I said about my friends mitsubishis, you and other people were saying Mitsu's reliability was good and I was just bringing up the other Mitsu's that were not good. I know we are comparing CUV's, but we were talking brands and I was talking about brands and the other cars of a certain brand. I have driven the competition, and the CR-V impressed me the most. I am NOT saying the Outlander rides bad, of bad quality interior, or is slow, or anything else I could not possibly know or be able to tell. I was just saying what thought of the back end and the third row looks, from the pictures. All I did in the post you are referring to, was answer the four points.
|
- #108 of 151
-
Re: Ford Edge Horsepower [piast]
by carfreak8
-
Dec 10, 2006 (2:17 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: piast (Dec 10, 2006 11:04 am)
The Edge doesn't have what it takes to help solve Ford's problems'
Definatly true. The edge is way over priced and the only somewhat innovation in it is the vista roof (although competitors do have that so maybe not). But even that is dumb, it weighs waaay too much. Making the Edge a slower vehicle. The interior will never compete with others, no Ford does. If this car rides anything like Escape, it is crap, if it rides like CX-7 (same platform), or even the RDX, it can compete, lets hope it does, for Fords sake.
Ford has many problems. They can't seem to do anything right these days. The Escape is a joke and interior is probably one of the worst in the segment. The Freestyle is boxy and boring...and under powered-for how big it is.
|
- #109 of 151
-
Re: Ford Edge Horsepower [carfreak8]
by carfreak8
-
Dec 10, 2006 (5:28 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: carfreak8 (Dec 10, 2006 2:17 pm)
I should add that I feel that the CX-7 is a much better buy than the Edge.
|
- #110 of 151
-
I am shopping for one...
by jennafl
-
Dec 19, 2006 (1:29 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: KarenS (Aug 29, 2006 4:08 am)
Comments please.. I read the article and have to ask about RESALE value in 4 years on each. I am guessing the Honda holds its value better?
Anyone can email me about the Santa Fe, Saturn Vue, and the Honda CRV.. I am looking at all three 2007's and I am really torn. Mileage is terrible.. warranties are not the same... eeek!.
|