Sign In Join 



Hyundai Accent Real World MPG

84 messages,  Last post on May 03, 2009 at 1:13 PM

You are in the Hyundai Accent Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Accent, Hatchback, Sedan


Messages Page 7 of 10
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#52 of 84
Re: Amazing MPG's [hdvideo] by misterno
May 09, 2008 (6:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hdvideo (May 07, 2008 9:06 am)

I don't know why I am getting 21mpg mine is automatic shift maybe that is why.
Or maybe that little override button is always pressed on??
 
What do you think?
#53 of 84
mpg a bit low for a small hatchback by fastrunner
May 15, 2008 (1:44 pm)
Reply
I really like the look of the Hyundai Accent Hatchback, and the price, and the warranty, etc. My biggest problem is the low mpg owners are getting.
I currently own a 2007 Yaris Hatchback, and I am please with the mpg. I am considering another new car, but the Accent mpg should be better than it is.
#54 of 84
Re: mpg a bit low for a small hatchback [fastrunner] by clev_accent
May 15, 2008 (8:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fastrunner (May 15, 2008 1:44 pm)

The Accent is a great car and I have no idea why people are getting such low mileage. I've had mine (an automatic) for just about two weeks now and I have been getting a solid 30+ on my first two fill-ups.
#55 of 84
Re: mpg a bit low for a small hatchback [clev_accent] by kuripot
May 19, 2008 (7:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: clev_accent (May 15, 2008 8:14 pm)

I don't understand the poor mileage some Accent owners are getting either. Mine is a 3 door manual 2008. My first tank netted 33 mpg and the second got 34 mpg. Thats with about 70% highway driving around 65 mph. I expect even better results after break-in and synthetic lubricants.
 
Kuripot
#56 of 84
Re: mpg a bit low for a small hatchback [kuripot] by misterno
Jun 01, 2008 (6:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: kuripot (May 19, 2008 7:21 am)

well I don't know why I am getting 21mpg in the city. Next thing I will do, is to change my fuel filter. Then I will post the results here.
 
I think my car has a problem, this all happened after I used the tank all the way till it was empty last year. Then, it started to have startup problems so I used Gumout and the problem went away but low MPG stayed. I don't know the MPG before this incident.
#57 of 84
Re: mpg a bit low for a small hatchback [misterno] by wantecon
Jun 19, 2008 (6:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: misterno (Jun 01, 2008 6:12 am)

I have a 2007 Accent. The Sticker which is based on the UNREALISTIC EPA criteria for the 2007 model year states 32 CITY and 35 HGWY.
Until now, I have NEVER after 21,000 miles gotten anywhere near the EPA estimates. First of all let me state that I ACCURATELY check my MPG's by totally filling the tank and resetting the trip odometer to 0 then driving on the tank and then refilling to the top and then divide miles driven by gallons filled to the top.
 
OK, here's what I have found works in my case to improve milage. I am not advocating it's use for anybody but myself, but I can tell you it works for me. My Accent is a 5speed manual tranny and I'm sure that most of you others that have the same model year with a manual gearbox can attest to the fact that 5th gear is geared WAY TOO LOW for the 65 mph speed limit on the highway. Sometimes it almost seems that it feels as if I am still in 3rd when on the highway, ...but I'm not. My wife suggested when going down hills in what would normally be 5th gear, to drift down the hill in NEUTRAL instead.....with the engine ON , of course. As a result of her suggestion, this tank got me the highest MPG ever posted since we owned the car. 37.61 MPG!!!
  
My other car is a VW Passat TDI at 296,000 miles and I always get 45 + on that car which even with diesel being $1.00 + per gallon still is more economical than this little pod of a car and might I add a whole lot safer for my kids to be in the back seat as well. Man, I remember when I had my 92 GEO Metro and CONSISTENTLY GOT 45 + and now we try desperately to eek out over 30mpg. And car manufacturers brag about highway milage at 30!!?? WTF?
#58 of 84
Re: mpg a bit low for a small hatchback [wantecon] by backy
Jun 19, 2008 (6:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wantecon (Jun 19, 2008 6:17 pm)

Might want to be careful with that technique.. not only is it unsafe (since you lose control of the car with it in neutral), but at least in some states it's illegal to coast downhill in neutral.
#59 of 84
Re: mpg a bit low for a small hatchback [wantecon] by radar1
Jun 19, 2008 (6:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wantecon (Jun 19, 2008 6:17 pm)

You didn't mention what year or trans you had in the Passat TDI, but the 98 manual trans was rated at 50 MPG Hwy, so at 45 MPG even that gets less than the EPA rating for you (if that's what you have). Although coasting will improve MPG slightly, I doubt if the coasting would actually add very much to your MPG. One of my cars has an instant MPG readout, and although that one gets about 27MPG overall, it will exceed 99MPG going downhill without coasting so the downhill sections do not hurt your MPG even if the revs remain the same, because you're not pushing the gas pedal down.
 
John
#60 of 84
Re: mpg a bit low for a small hatchback [radar1] by wantecon
Jun 19, 2008 (7:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: radar1 (Jun 19, 2008 6:49 pm)

I'm sorry, yes the 98 Passat TDI manual tranny was rated at 50 MPG, but I have a 1997 manual rated at 38 and 47. I get a combined 45 with AC. I use the SCANGUAGE II to calculate exact instant, current and tank milage as well as many other engine functions. Just having that guage has improved my fuel economy and I recommend it to everyone because it encourages good driving habits and is NOT the same as the OEM driving computers that come with many cars. Well worth the $159 pricetag. Additionally, I use the "pulse and glide" method to maximize economy. Pulse and glide is not possible on the 2007 manual ACCENT simply beacuse of the low 5th gear ratio.
 I will be going on trip to DC this weekend in the VW and will be getting 50 + on the HGWY using alternative fuel as I have done for the last 8 tanks which costs me about $.50/ gallon to make. I am not a shill for any company, so if anyboby is interested please look it up on the internet. Sorry about mentioning Scanguage by name.
  Regarding the coasting, like I said... It works for me and I do not suggest it for everyone. However, I must disagree with you in that you must not be familiar with the 2007 tranny. IT IS JUST SIMPLY GEARED TOO LOW! YOU MUST ACCELERATE DOWN A HILL ON THE INTERSTATE to keep it from slowing down. Coasting does improve speed DRAMATICALLY....PERIOD. Check out some others' post on this thread from those who have the 2007 with manual trannies. I have literally taken it out of gear and re-shifted into 5th thinking that I put it in 3rd by mistake. I understand the engine is not under load going down hills in gear, but the low 5th gear ratio simply acts as a brake which in turn causes the driver to HAVE TO accelerate to keep up to hghwy speeds, which in turn DRAMATICALLY decreases fuel efficiency because the engine must be PUSHED to go DOWN a hill. Once again, you MUST PUSH THE GAS PEDAL DOWN, unlike you posted. Yes, it is that bad because it is geared THAT low in 5th. I hope I'm making my point, it geared that low my friend.
 
 As for the safety issue, I'm not sure if I buy that either. If evasive action is needed the driver needs to shift into gear. Let me add this caveat to my previous statements... I do not recommend this coasting technique in and inclement weather such as rain, snow or sleet.
 
As for legality, I guess if I'm ever driving with a policman in my car I won't use the technique either. LOL
 
In summary , with kids and wife in the car I never got over 31 mpg with the tires inflated to 95% of maximum allowed pressure. Now, with this coasting method with wifey and kids in car for most trips, I got 37.61 on this tank.
#61 of 84
low mpg of 21 by misterno
Jun 22, 2008 (8:01 am)
Reply
Back to my MPG problem
 
2002 Accent Auto Transmission, hatchback 1.6 Engine
 
I think I need to have the following done; spark plugs, wires, air filter, fuel filter, cleaning the throttle, check the o2 sensor..
 
Anythingelse I should do? 21mpg in city 33 mpg in hwy
 
somebody on a different folder said he cleaned the carberator. This car does not have carberator does it?

Messages Page 7 of 10
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement