Sign In Join 



Pontiac G6 vs. VW Eos

17 messages,  Last post on Aug 18, 2007 at 12:41 PM

You are in the Pontiac G6 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Pontiac G6, Volkswagen Eos, Coupe, Convertible, Sedan


Messages Page 2 of 2
1
2
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#11 of 17
Re: For the money... [f14tomcat] by cb391
Jul 23, 2007 (6:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: f14tomcat (Jul 23, 2007 2:39 pm)

Size has nothing to do with fit and finish. Fit and finish are more determined by design and quality of materials used and quality of assembly performed. Just because a Golf is smaller than a Passat doesnt mean a Golf should be considered crap. A Sunfire may not be good because GM designed it and US automakers have never built a good small car here because it was never a high priority. It has always been easier to import something from overseas. By the way the G6 has it's own Quality issues.
#12 of 17
Re: For the money... [cb391] by f14tomcat
Jul 24, 2007 (2:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cb391 (Jul 23, 2007 6:43 pm)

GM has never made good small cars so you should not expect the Sunfire to be up to the standards of the midsize car which GM puts more into.
 
By the way, what quality issues has the G6 had?
#13 of 17
Re: For the money... [paulzooms] by slackerman
Aug 03, 2007 (7:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: paulzooms (Jul 22, 2007 12:55 pm)

Hey, I have a 1996 Pontiac Sunfire convertible (2.4L, 5-speed) and it's still running well. OK, after 10 years I had to have the top replaced, but how long do you expect a softtop last?
 
The quality issues have been more than bearable.
#14 of 17
Quality... by f14tomcat
Aug 04, 2007 (4:00 am)
Reply
I always thought the build quality was good on the Sunfire/Cavalier too, but I guess it is a matter of opinion. I will say though that the Eos is a well made machine. However it is apples and oranges to compare its quality to the quality of the Sunfire. The Sunfire was last generation and the Eos benefits from modern quality. Compare the Eos build quality to that of the Pontiac G5 and then see how close you are. Thats more accurate.
#15 of 17
Re: For the money... [f14tomcat] by cb391
Aug 05, 2007 (8:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: f14tomcat (Jul 24, 2007 2:42 pm)

Some G6 coupes have reported leaks and the G6 convertible finished last in convertible crash tests and the driver's seat came partially unmounted
#16 of 17
2008 Sebring Convertible hardtop 2.7L vs. VW Eos by flash11
Aug 12, 2007 (8:19 am)
Reply
Lets have a comparison of the new 2008 Sebring Convertible hardtop versus the VW Eos 2.0T and the G6 convertibles.
The Sebring limited model also has a 3.5L engine option, but I like the 2.7L 190 hp. flex fuel (E85) engine. The Eos is a nice car but as mentioned in a previous email under the Eos string the parts are fragile and costly. Sebring parts are about half the cost and Chrysler just announced a lifetime warrantee on the powertrain on all Chrysler products. The VW Eos has a diesel engine and gets 23/32 mpg better than the 2008 Sebring's 2.7L 18/28 mpg, although I am still waiting for statistics on the Sebring's 2.7L flex fuel engine using environmentally friendlier E85 ethanol based fuel with a 50 cent cheaper per gallon price tag which then beats the cost overall on fuel consumption versus diesel fuel.
Price tag for a loaded 2008 Sebring Convertible Limited or Touring model $34-38K, the VW Eos $35-38K, the G6 GT convertible 250hp (sportiest of the group) 16/25mpg $32-36K.
Any other comments out their, personal experiences with these 3 makes of car ?
#17 of 17
Re: 2008 Sebring Convertible hardtop 2.7L vs. VW Eos [flash11] by 600kgolfgt
Aug 18, 2007 (12:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: flash11 (Aug 12, 2007 8:19 am)

The VW Eos has a diesel engine and gets 23/32 mpg
 
The VW Eos only came with two engines - the Audi-sourced 2.0T and VW's VR6 engines - both of which require premium gasoline - not diesel.
 
under the Eos string the parts are fragile and costly
 
If you are referring to the hardtop mechanism only, I will buy that argument - given the fact that it just came out on the market, and the jury is still out on its reliability/durability. But the chassis and powertrain (which have been out for quite sometime in the Jetta GLI and VW GTI), have proven to be quite robust and reliable to date.
 
Given the state of Chrysler - which is currently owned by the venture-capital group Cerebus and headed by an ex-Home Depot CEO (who is credited with nearly running Home Depot into the ground), I would be very wary of Chrysler products these days.
 
Cases in point:
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=4654
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=4692

Messages Page 2 of 2
1
2
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement