Sign In Join 



BMW X3 vs Acura RDX

327 messages,  Last post on Nov 24, 2009 at 11:53 AM

You are in the BMW X3 & X5 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Acura RDX, BMW X3, Car Buying, SUV


Messages Page 29 of 34
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
...
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#275 of 327
Re: RDX v. X3 [x3driver] by varmint
Feb 23, 2007 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: x3driver (Feb 22, 2007 5:38 pm)

Agreed. Rather than going for luxurious, I think Acura opted to go high-tech with the interior. On paper that works for the target demographic (youngish urban males). However, I think it turns off the other buyers who just want a nicely put together, semi-sporty vehicle with some utility.
#276 of 327
RE: RDX v. X3 by micckie
Feb 24, 2007 (9:40 am)
Reply
I can't say I fit the demographic stereotype living in a more rural area, a woman turning forty. But, while dealing with BMW (working out a lease.. not a purchase), I couldn't help but think what a ridiculous move I was making when I could afford to purchase the RDX. Clearly, In my mind, driving one right after the other, It was more vehicle for the money. I also felt it was MORE lux (but that's me) then the BMW inside, and the seats were more comfy. I liked the styling outside of the X3 better. I think in all, I almost leased it because of the stigma attached... and it has a pan sunroof! But it wasn't worth the price. I didn't get that "Wow" when I got in it.
    I've had the car now 2 months, and I'm still learning something new every day. I'm not "young" per say, but I still have that wild side, where I enjoy a sporty fun ride, with state of the art techno-candy. Maybe turning 60, I'll think about settling down into a refined quiet comfort, but until then, I'm spoolin
#277 of 327
RE: RDX v. X3 [micckie] by bodble2
Feb 24, 2007 (9:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: micckie (Feb 24, 2007 9:40 am)

"I'm not "young" per say"
 
Forty is young. You're only as old as you drive! (ie. don't buy a Buick, or a Caddie)
#278 of 327
RE: RDX v. X3 [micckie] by x3driver
Feb 24, 2007 (1:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: micckie (Feb 24, 2007 9:40 am)

You can't go wrong with either one, it's art, not science, deciding between the two. The price might not be as far apart as you think, what with the BMW 4 year / 50K maintenance, etc, but then again, I bet you don't get to know your Service Manager as well as I will
#279 of 327
RE: RDX v. X3 [x3driver] by wwest
Feb 24, 2007 (10:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: x3driver (Feb 24, 2007 1:34 pm)

"..it's art, not science, deciding between the two..."
 
NOT...!!
 
The X3 has a very definite RWD engine torque bias and also is available with a stick shift.
 
If you have any expectation at all of often encountering wintertime adverse roadbed conditions the X3 will be the obvious choice of those with experience and knowledge of driving in those conditions.
#280 of 327
RE: RDX v. X3 [wwest] by patentcad1
Feb 25, 2007 (4:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: wwest (Feb 24, 2007 10:45 pm)

>>If you have any expectation at all of often encountering wintertime adverse roadbed conditions the X3 will be the obvious choice of those with experience and knowledge of driving in those conditions<< It's hard to overstate how utterly silly this statement is. I've had a base RDX (no tech package) since October. I drove the car 25 miles over largely unplowed roads after a 12"+ snowstorm last week. No problems. Overall the best handling car I've owned. The car is phenomenal wet roads, snowy roads, dry roads. A bit stiff riding over some surfaces, but the handling is remarkable. Loving the car after 6500 miles. By the way, I got a tech package RDX as a loaner car and I greatly prefer my base car. The tech package was annoying. GPS screen is too small, too hard to read in bright daylight and is not a touch screen. The Nav in my 2004 TL is MUCH bigger, MUCH brighter, and MUCH easier to use. I'll stick with my little Garmin dashtop unit on those rare occasions when I need it. Works great. Fits in the center console of the RDX with my entire livingroom set. It is remarkable to me (and a real comment on how dopey many car buyers are) that the focus on the RDX is the tech package. IT's THE CAR STUPID. And the bluetooth, Nav, etc. are static compared to the core issues here. I have all those features on my TL. I don't use the bluetooth, voice commands, etc. Only the Nav. And I don't miss that at all with the Garmin at my disposal whenever I need it. Which is about 6x annually.
#281 of 327
RDX v. X3 by x3driver
Feb 25, 2007 (7:45 am)
Reply
Well micckie, (and other looking at both an X3 and RDX) if those two last posts don't prove my point (deciding between the two is an art, not a science), then nothing does!
 
I'm gonna go enjoy the drive......
#282 of 327
Re: RDX v. X3 [x3driver] by wwest
Feb 25, 2007 (11:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: x3driver (Feb 25, 2007 7:45 am)

Oh, now I see, you're saying the decision process is an art form, I'll agree with that.
 
I am a great admirer of the SH-AWD system and the break-through technology and outside-the-box thinking it represents, and I have said so many places. But when it comes to recommending, nay, REQUIRING, a patently UNSAFE use of tire chains I'll always vote for the competition.
#283 of 327
Lease: X3. Buy: RDX by patentcad1
Feb 25, 2007 (11:47 am)
Reply
The X3 is a nicer car. And pricier. If you're leasing, the money BMW throws lease programs combined with the car's high residual might well make you lean towards the X3. If you're BUYING the car, the X3 is very pricey. Nicer? Yeah, OK. $8K nicer? Not for me. The Acura will probably be cheaper to own for a driver like me with higher miles (15K+ annually) who plans to keep the car 10+ years.
#284 of 327
RDX vs. X3 by micckie
Mar 02, 2007 (7:17 am)
Reply
Bimmer isn't giving the buyer anything but a base model car. Any options are pricey. When the warrantee runs out, you'd better run away. If you're leasing it, and you don't mind borrowing the car at a high price, then yea, it's a good choice. There's a whole lot more folks leasing Bimmers then buying them. Any sales associate will tell you that (especially those who have the $ to purchase them).
   Personally, to bring the X3 up to a comparable buy (what you get for your $) then that would be a ridiculous price to pat for the logo. As far as winter driving goes, where are the bimmer drivers getting this notion of better handling with back wheel drive? I see Bimmers in the snow spinning their back tires, and going nowhere. That's one of the main things that steer me away. Even Bimer drivers will admit that's what they hate. They lease the Bimmer for the handling, service/maintenance plan and stigma, Not for the resale value that the salesmen keep throwing back at ya (It is leased far more then purchased).

Messages Page 29 of 34
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
...
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement