Ask the Car People.SM


Honda Civic Tires and Wheels

263 messages,  Last post on May 19, 2011 at 6:52 PM

You are in the Honda Civic Forum.

What is this discussion about? Honda Civic, Coupe, Sedan

Messages Page 25 of 27

#234 of 263 Re: 2009 Civic TIRE questions [oktexchic] by ruking1

Aug 16, 2009 (8:55 am)

Replying to: oktexchic (Aug 10, 2009 8:57 am)
With 26,000 miles per year (I take it that is only the commute) if it were me, it makes all the sense in the world to keep the stock wheels. Then, just keep yourself in good quality commute tires.

#235 of 263 Tire specs vs. OEM by texastransplan

Oct 17, 2009 (6:29 pm)

My daughter drives a 2007 Honda Civic LX Sedan. She needs to replace the tires. The OEM tires have a Speed Rating of H and a Load Rating of 91. Would there be any ill-effects from replacing them with tires with a Speed Rating of T and a Load Rating of 89?
 
I know that a T Speed Rating indicates a lower speed than the H, but T is supposed to be OK up to 118mph, which should cover anything she will do.
 
I'm less sure about the difference in the Load Rating.

#236 of 263 RE: Tire specs vs. OEM by jet10000

Oct 20, 2009 (9:17 pm)

My daughter drives a 2007 Honda Civic LX Sedan. She needs to replace the tires. The OEM tires have a Speed Rating of H and a Load Rating of 91. Would there be any ill-effects from replacing them with tires with a Speed Rating of T and a Load Rating of 89?
 
Here's a chart that will help you see how much weight difference will be going from a 91 to an 89:
 
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=35

#237 of 263 RE: Tire specs vs. OEM [jet10000] by texastransplan

Oct 27, 2009 (12:04 pm)

Replying to: jet10000 (Oct 20, 2009 9:17 pm)
Thanks for the response.
 
If I am interpreting the chart correctly, each tire could hande 1279 lbs for the lower rated tire vs. 1356 for the higher.
 
1279 x 4 = 5116
 
1356 x 4 = 5424
 
So the load carrying capacity of the car would be reduced by 318 lbs.
 
5,116 lbs sounds like plenty for a vehicle with a curb weight of 2,657 lbs.

#238 of 263 RE: Tire specs vs. OEM [texastransplan] by jet10000

Oct 29, 2009 (7:41 am)

Replying to: texastransplan (Oct 27, 2009 12:04 pm)
If I am interpreting the chart correctly, each tire could hande 1279 lbs for the lower rated tire vs. 1356 for the higher.
 
Yes, that's my interpretation as well.

#239 of 263 Advice on new tires by rwerdinger

Dec 03, 2009 (9:56 pm)

I need new tires for my 2000 Honda 4-door Civic. I have Michelin now and would prefer to economize if possible and still get decent-quality wheels. I live in northern California and very occasionally might drive over icy roads. My mechanic has recommended Uniroyal TP Tour as a mid-range choice. Any recommendations out there?

#240 of 263 Re: Civic rear tires wearing out fast by khatarnak

Dec 16, 2009 (3:57 pm)

Replying to: funtechie (Aug 16, 2009 8:21 am)
I say we should take Honda Motor company to court. File a Class Action Lawsuit!
My Brother and I each bought new HCH's in 2007. My brother noticed a problem with the handling on his vehicle at highway speeds about a year after the purchase. He thought it was a steering problem and was afraid to drive the car anymore, so he called Honda and informed them. Honda sent a tow truck to take the car to a Honda dealership. The knuckle-head tow truck driver did not check whether the emergency hand brake was engaged and towed the car with it on. That fried the cars rear brake shoes, drums, bearings etc. Honda refused to take responsibility, first saying the tow truck was operated by a sub-contractor. Then they changed their story and insisted that the damage must have happened earlier - insinuating that my brother must have been driving with the emerg brake engaged!
My brother filed a case with small claims court and Honda finally was forced to pay. But they just covered half the expense incurred. My brother was fed up by then and did not pursue it. Later he had his tires replaced due to uneven wear. Nothing was ever mentioned about this TSB. No more Honda's for either of us. We have had it with them. I have had good experiences with Toyota before so it'll be Toyota from now on. Everyone I know, will also be given this info and advised to avoid Honda.
Some of you might wonder why my vehicle did not have the same prob's. I happen to be a sailor so I drive it very little. Just took it in for an oil change to Honda dealership and the Tech recommended alignment due to uneven tire wear! No mention of the TSB. Lucky for me I googled the problem and stumbled onto this forum. Thanks for this great thread. I will keep you guys posted about my car as I have called in today and made appointment for tomorrow.
Also found that the Accord 2009 & 2010 have a brake problem and Honda is treating those owners badly too. No more Honda's for me. Make this my last Honda.

#241 of 263 Re: Civic rear tires wearing out fast [khatarnak] by khatarnak

Dec 17, 2009 (7:01 am)

Replying to: khatarnak (Dec 16, 2009 3:57 pm)
Well, I must say I was pleasantly surprised with Honda this time! I took my vehicle in to Mississauga Honda along with the TSB. After telling me that the TSB was American and not Canadian, the service advisor accepted my car as a Canadian TSB exists for the same problem. He called me later to inform me that the parts were on order and would be in within a few days. As for the Tires, I would pay half as Honda would be prorating them. They called me when the control arms came in and I took my car in again. I found out I would have to pay $270 plus tax for my share of the tire price. I wasn’t happy that the new tires would be Dunlop’s. He told me Honda would only pay for Dunlop’s as they had low rolling resistance and were a must for the Hybrid. I had no choice but didn’t like that as I have not read good things about the Dunlop original tires. Besides, that seemed to be a high price to pay for shitty tires. Anyway, I told him to go ahead and do it and I would claim a refund from Honda. I had already filed a complaint with BBB.
After leaving the car at the dealership I called Honda Canada later in the day and they listened to me and I was given a file number and told they would let me know of their decision within 48 hrs. Note that my car has 27000 kms and I have 3 months left to complte 3 years since I purchased it.
When I went to pick up my car, BOY was I surprised! No charge for anything and I had 4 new tires! Well, THANK YOU Honda. I have no more complaint. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all.

#242 of 263 RE: Tire specs vs. OEM [texastransplan] by sotony

Dec 31, 2009 (6:01 pm)

Replying to: texastransplan (Oct 27, 2009 12:04 pm)
I'm also getting a crash course (pls excuse the pun) in tire specs, as I am replacing tires on my Civic soon. I agree with your interpretation of the charts, but keep in mind that the tire load rating is not the only limiting factor of the car's maximum load capacity. I'm sure the suspension components also have a lot to do with it. The manual states that the max load of all passengers/cargo/trailer tongue weight is 850 lbs (pg. 158 in my '06 EX Sedan's manual). My OEM tires (Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02) have the lower 89 load rating. So, I really doubt the tire's load rating is the limiting factor in the overall vehicle load capacity. At most, the better load rating might give better handling. Hope this helps!

#243 of 263 Re: Civic rear tires wearing out fast [khatarnak] by civicowner3

Mar 14, 2010 (5:38 pm)

Replying to: khatarnak (Dec 16, 2009 3:57 pm)
here here!!!!!! my 08 civic holds multiple problems, for which I am being ignored here in canada. never buy honda! This will be my last!

Messages Page 25 of 27

To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement