Article Comments: 2007 Ford Expedition First Drive

38 messages, Last post on May 17, 2007 at 10:28 AM

You are in the Ford Expedition Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Ford Expedition, SUV

Article comments for First Drive: 2007 Ford Expedition - Skyrocketing fuel costs have reduced the large SUV market from 1 million units in 2004 to an estimated 650,000 this year. Retaining market share in this climate means offering more and selling it for less. Ford, apparently, has figured this out. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 5: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; Prev; Next; Last

#6 of 38 WHY ARE OTHER CARS MPG TRASHED????? by bmwluvr Aug 12, 2006 (4:33 pm)
im confused people complain about mpg and $3 gas whenever they discuss full size suvs, but what about cars that are no where near there size and get about the same to worse gas mileage and are daily drivers or frequent drivers as well. the e550 gets worse gas mileage than a tahoe, so does the infiniti fx35/fx45, toureg, and the srx v8 also, along with the x5 v8, the turbo rdx suv gets 16 in the city the tahoe gets 17, how many midsive family, and luxury sedans get 17 23-28 epa ratings which are not that far off the tahoes but no one trashed those cars as beasts or monsters, not that drive one of these or would even want one just saying "logically" whats worse a 5 seater vehicle with space no where near an expedition and tahoe or a car that seats 7 or more has a v8, and can take off road, its a no brainer. every srt vehicle except the neon, crossfire and caliber have horrible gas mileage, as does the m5, m6 and all amg's except the c55, and what about the exotics why does the gallardo get 11mpg, or maseratis. lets be fair please........ Replies to this message: fundad (Aug 13, 2006 8:17 am) bwillis2006 (Nov 04, 2006 12:46 pm)
#7 of 38 Re: WHY ARE OTHER CARS MPG TRASHED????? [bmwluvr] by fundad Aug 13, 2006 (8:17 am)
Replying to: bmwluvr (Aug 12, 2006 4:33 pm) I have wondered the same thing. A company minivan we have only gets 14-15mpg around town. Also, we have owned MANY suvs, Explorers, Expeditions, Yukon Denalis. We have also owned every pickup that these SUVs are based on and EVERY pickup got worse MPG than the SUV.
#8 of 38 EXPEDITION OR TAHOE? by exdog Aug 13, 2006 (2:03 pm)
After long research for my next SUV I decided to stick with Ford and go with the 07 Expedition. The only thing that almost sold me on a 07 Tahoe was the exterior's front end headlamps-Land Rover look alike and the MPG. Expedition's interior takes the cake. I also like the center console shifter on the Expedition vs. the steering column one on the Tahoe, never a fan of steering column shifters. Overall the Expedition was well thought of. Replies to this message: rsholland (Aug 14, 2006 8:16 am) maryfshort (Aug 17, 2006 9:09 am) zeeman84 (Aug 21, 2006 11:11 am)
#9 of 38 Re: EXPEDITION OR TAHOE? [exdog] by rsholland Aug 14, 2006 (8:16 am)
Replying to: exdog (Aug 13, 2006 2:03 pm) Absolutely. The Tahoe's lack of fold-into-the-floor 3rd-row seats would be a deal killer for me if I was in the market for such a vehicle. Bob Replies to this message: maryfshort (Aug 17, 2006 9:09 am) zeeman84 (Aug 21, 2006 11:11 am)
#10 of 38 2007 Expy] by maryfshort Aug 17, 2006 (9:09 am)
Replying to: rsholland (Aug 14, 2006 8:16 am) I made my decision after seeing and test driving the Tahoe, Suburban, Yukon. Going to get my fourth Expy. The third row seat on the GM models was a deal killer. Has anyone seen the 2007 Expy on the street yet? Does anyone have any idea when we can see these at the dealer? Ford Corporate told me to check with my local dealer. Local dealer told me to check with corporate. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks!
#11 of 38 Expedition Availability by olympus33 Aug 21, 2006 (9:27 am)
The 2007 Expedition and EL should be at dealerships in the next 2-4 weeks. Let me know if you have further detailed questions.
#12 of 38 Re: EXPEDITION OR TAHOE? [rsholland] by zeeman84 Aug 21, 2006 (11:11 am)
Replying to: rsholland (Aug 14, 2006 8:16 am) Also, G.M.'s AFM system does not seem to be delivering the advertised performance or mileage. Just check the Tahoe message boards. Quite a bit of frustration over there. I think that Ford has a good solid offering in the large SUV catagory with the expedition.
#13 of 38 Excursion replacement? by jesrf Aug 28, 2006 (8:08 pm)
The EL looks like it might be a possible replacement for our 04 Excursion Limited. Does anyone know if the 3rd row seat is shall we say "sittable" in the EL, I know the old Expedition had a 3rd row seat that was about an inch above the ground and not really suitable for hauling around 8 adults, if anyone knows please advise. FWIW, the Wall Street Journal compared the Expedition (EL I think) to the Suburban in Fridays edition and gave the edge to the Ford, primarily because of the ride quality and the smooth trans. On looks alone the Sub won out. Never thought I'd see the day a Ford truck rode better than a chevy...... Replies to this message: beach15 (Aug 29, 2006 4:00 am) canddmeyer (Sep 04, 2006 6:33 pm) explorerx4 (Sep 06, 2006 6:55 pm) maryfshort (Sep 14, 2006 2:25 pm)
#14 of 38 Re: Excursion replacement? [jesrf] by beach15 Aug 29, 2006 (4:00 am)
Replying to: jesrf (Aug 28, 2006 8:08 pm) Even in pics, the 3rd row has more space than your typical Suburban (which we own), and I've sat in the 3rd row of a current gen regular Expedition, and thought it was equal to that in our larger Chevy, except for actually having more foot & leg room. Definately no worries about that, especially with the IRS and the fact that the current model's seat is already quite good. The extended EL just improves on that. Here's a good pic of a person in an '07 EL's 3rd seat: And some more: Replies to this message: canddmeyer (Sep 04, 2006 6:33 pm) explorerx4 (Sep 06, 2006 6:55 pm) maryfshort (Sep 14, 2006 2:25 pm)
#15 of 38 Re: Excursion replacement? [beach15] by canddmeyer Sep 04, 2006 (6:33 pm)
Replying to: beach15 (Aug 29, 2006 4:00 am) These pic's match perfectly what I saw today during the California state fair in Sacramento. Myself, I didn't care for the seats very much as they seemed thin and just didn't wrap around me like I'd hope they would. Someone had their children in the 3rd row and everyone seemed content. I didn't care for the dash where the speedo display is at, but the 3rd row and cargo area looked great, especially when I compared it to a Tahoe, Yukon, and Denali XL I also got a look at today. GM products have those stupid seat rails sticking above the floor surface, among other issues. Last but not least, Ford should have kept the Excursion. Ford did a very poor job in marketing the Excursion. Dealers did themselves, the Excursion, and Ford in by refusing to negotiate on the vehicle, especially diesel equipped models. Proof of this is how fast they disappeared from lots locally when Ford went to employee pricing in 2005.