Sign In Join 

Best Car for a new teenage driver

554 messages,  Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 7:33 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying


Messages Page 55 of 56
1
...
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#537 of 554
Re: Thanks everyone for your replies. [exb0] by js06gv
Nov 04, 2009 (5:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: exb0 (Nov 02, 2009 6:15 pm)

Regarding the help you were looking for on the estimate:
 
a) The right fender was replaced with an aftermarketpart (CAPA = Certified Automotive Parts Association)
b) Recy means recycled (used) doors were utilized. Assy means that the entire door assembly was put on the car, as opposed to buying a brand new part which would have only been the shell and then you have to transfer all the "guts"
c) Looks like both right side doors were replaced - the full version of the estimate should specify front and rear
d) The body/structure pulling is very minor in nature based upon the hours allowed and if performed in a reputable repair facility I wouldn't let this bother me at all. This was probably to pull out the B-pillar some or pull the quarter before performing the body repair
 
Hope this helps.
#538 of 554
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [morin2] by plekto
Nov 04, 2009 (6:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: morin2 (Nov 04, 2009 4:21 pm)

The simple solution to a truck needing more weight in the rear is to put a simple shell on it. That's 300lbs or so of dead weight as well, which makes it more stable and slower(which is a plus in this case). But I've never had a problem. You learn to drive *more* carefully in a truck or large car than in a small one because you have to plan ahead. And RWD vehicles are plenty safe, despite the bad press that some people give them. I suggested 4x4 because it's what's really required for bad weather and snow if you have it. Yes, a big SUV would also work, but they are more money and can easily haul around friends.
 
I'd have recommended a Volvo 240/940 as well, but they are approaching 15+ years old and are a potential problem as a result. Still, the 240 with manual was by far my favorite car in the last ten years aside from my 67 Mercedes.
 
Oh - one interesting thing to note is that old Mercedes can be had for almost nothing as well as they are fine things to get around in. But maintaining it is a bit of money each year as you might expect. The best examples are anything from the 60s and 70s. Somehow, the sedans aren't appreciating at all in value despite being reliable and fun to drive.
 
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sfv/cto/1451940927.html
Awesome cars. Big, slow, safe, reliable, and a +5 on the visibility score since everyone looks twice at it. The trunk is almost as large as the entire interior of a Smart Car.
#539 of 554
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [plekto] by plekto
Nov 04, 2009 (7:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Nov 04, 2009 6:48 pm)

Part 2 - it wouldn't let me edit the post for some reason...
****
Of course, my personal beater truck - mind you I could afford most anything used - is an old 4Runner. Dirt cheap, reliable, and a nice 45/55 weight ratio so the rear stays planted. I've made emergency maneuvers at 70mph on the freeway and the rear end didn't budge an inch.
 
http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=61461.0
Mine's not nearly as nice as this, but you get the idea. - fun to work on and indestructible. Mine's approaching 400K miles rapidly as my daily driver and when this engine does, it'll cost me $1300 for a new one. If it ever dies. It goes like stink with the new header I put on it. The transmission was $1200, brand spanking new three years ago, installed, with a clutch. It's a fun, aggressive thing that costs nothing to maintain and can literally go to Alaska and back.
 
Old Land Cruisers are also nice as well, but are a bit pricey lately.
http://board.marlincrawler.com/index.php?topic=59811.0
I'd love to own this thing... heh. My next rig will likely be one of these.
 
There are so many better ways to spend that money and keep your kid safe than buying some jellybean-mobile commuter box.
#540 of 554
Re: Thanks everyone for your replies. [js06gv] by exb0
Nov 05, 2009 (6:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: js06gv (Nov 04, 2009 5:59 pm)

js06gv, thank you, that was very helpful. The repairs where performed by the Sterling Autobody Ctr, a national chain and subsidiary of Allstate insurance. That might explain the low $4K estimate.
 
I decided to keep the car for the kids. The kids are excited, and my mother is happy to do this for them. I am sure that in the hands of two teenagers, this car will see the inside of body shop a few more times. With 12K on the clock, how can I go wrong. In six years or so I'll sell it for $3K and nobody will care about the previous body damage.
#541 of 554
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [plekto] by morin2
Nov 05, 2009 (4:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Nov 04, 2009 7:22 pm)

Yes - I would agree with the 4Runner suggestion. Also, the visibility from the 4Runner's driver's seat is far superior than a small pickup with a cap. The cap weight helps a bit in handling, but is more than offset by the increased blind spot - so not good for a new driver. I've owned many pickups, big and small, and there's just no way they can be recommended for a new driver. The vehicles with the highest teenager fatalities are small pickups (Ford Ranger is #1 in fatalities).
#542 of 554
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [morin2] by plekto
Nov 06, 2009 (7:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: morin2 (Nov 05, 2009 4:57 pm)

Also, Toyotas with the 4 cylinder and manual get reasonable mileage and aren't really fast. MIne maxxes out at around 80mph but really starts to complain above 70-75.(gearing issue, not power) But thanks to short gearing, it does 0-60 in about 10-12 seconds, which is about what normal traffic does. I have to rev it to 3-4K rpm while they loaf at 1/4 throttle, but I have no issues with traffic, and this is in Los Angeles as well.
 
Plus they're cheap - just stay away from the 3.0 V6 and you'll be fine. Mine is about 4-6 inches higher than a typical pickup and has big metal bars on the sides(added - $200 used) plus I added another roll bar inside. It's safe and then some. Probably run over a Smart Car without realizing it
#543 of 554
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [morin2] by explorerx4
Nov 06, 2009 (4:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: morin2 (Nov 05, 2009 4:57 pm)

where did you get your fatality stat?
#544 of 554
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [explorerx4] by morin2
Nov 06, 2009 (6:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Nov 06, 2009 4:36 pm)

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/iihs-crash-tests-small-pickups-majority-flunk- /
 
3rd paragraph, last sentence:
"The IIHS also tells us that small pickups have the highest driver death rates of any vehicles on the road, which makes these tests all the more significant."
 
Somewhere there are rates by model as well. Ranger was highest for many years. The data for small pickup death rates has been the highest of any vehicle type for at least the past 3 decades.
#545 of 554
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [morin2] by plekto
Nov 06, 2009 (8:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: morin2 (Nov 06, 2009 6:53 pm)

Yet a small SUV/4x4 is worlds better. The big problem is side impacts with trucks and being a foot higher (or more) off the ground plus extra off-road bits and pieces... well, I know one guy who had someone turn in front of them(didn't look) at 45mph. Guy's back is still kind of messed up, but he survived. The woman was in the hospital for two weeks. His dog broke its back in two places it was so violent.
 
The reason he survived was certainly because his old Toyota was so solidly built and all the extra stuff he put on it(the big bull bars and so on saved the engine from ending up in his lap, though the truck was totaled otherwise))
 
Look, nothing is perfect. little econoboxes aren't much better. If it was me, I'd get my son an old Town Car, but....
#546 of 554
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [plekto] by tankbeans
Nov 07, 2009 (7:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Nov 06, 2009 7:25 am)

If it's as high as you say it is the Smart probably wouldn't be damaged either.
Maybe if the driver of said Smart was shaken you could load their car into the cargo hold and bring them someplace to calm down.

Messages Page 55 of 56
1
...
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement