Sign In Join 



Best Car for a new teenage driver

551 messages,  Last post on Nov 07, 2009 at 4:06 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying


Messages Page 56 of 56
1
...
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#542 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [morin2] by plekto
Nov 06, 2009 (7:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: morin2 (Nov 05, 2009 4:57 pm)

Also, Toyotas with the 4 cylinder and manual get reasonable mileage and aren't really fast. MIne maxxes out at around 80mph but really starts to complain above 70-75.(gearing issue, not power) But thanks to short gearing, it does 0-60 in about 10-12 seconds, which is about what normal traffic does. I have to rev it to 3-4K rpm while they loaf at 1/4 throttle, but I have no issues with traffic, and this is in Los Angeles as well.
 
Plus they're cheap - just stay away from the 3.0 V6 and you'll be fine. Mine is about 4-6 inches higher than a typical pickup and has big metal bars on the sides(added - $200 used) plus I added another roll bar inside. It's safe and then some. Probably run over a Smart Car without realizing it
#543 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [morin2] by explorerx4
Nov 06, 2009 (4:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: morin2 (Nov 05, 2009 4:57 pm)

where did you get your fatality stat?
#544 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [explorerx4] by morin2
Nov 06, 2009 (6:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Nov 06, 2009 4:36 pm)

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/iihs-crash-tests-small-pickups-majority-flunk- /
 
3rd paragraph, last sentence:
"The IIHS also tells us that small pickups have the highest driver death rates of any vehicles on the road, which makes these tests all the more significant."
 
Somewhere there are rates by model as well. Ranger was highest for many years. The data for small pickup death rates has been the highest of any vehicle type for at least the past 3 decades.
#545 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [morin2] by plekto
Nov 06, 2009 (8:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: morin2 (Nov 06, 2009 6:53 pm)

Yet a small SUV/4x4 is worlds better. The big problem is side impacts with trucks and being a foot higher (or more) off the ground plus extra off-road bits and pieces... well, I know one guy who had someone turn in front of them(didn't look) at 45mph. Guy's back is still kind of messed up, but he survived. The woman was in the hospital for two weeks. His dog broke its back in two places it was so violent.
 
The reason he survived was certainly because his old Toyota was so solidly built and all the extra stuff he put on it(the big bull bars and so on saved the engine from ending up in his lap, though the truck was totaled otherwise))
 
Look, nothing is perfect. little econoboxes aren't much better. If it was me, I'd get my son an old Town Car, but....
#546 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [plekto] by tankbeans
Nov 07, 2009 (7:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Nov 06, 2009 7:25 am)

If it's as high as you say it is the Smart probably wouldn't be damaged either.
Maybe if the driver of said Smart was shaken you could load their car into the cargo hold and bring them someplace to calm down.
#547 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [tankbeans] by plekto
Nov 07, 2009 (8:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: tankbeans (Nov 07, 2009 7:16 am)

http://arch.smugmug.com/photos/103108729_5TuaV-L.jpg
Looks like someone already had that idea.
 
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/smart%20car%20crash1.jpg
Of course, you're right - it might be easy to just load into the cargo bay after a crash. I honestly haven't seen anything that bad since VW Bugs were on the road.
#548 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [plekto] by tankbeans
Nov 07, 2009 (11:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Nov 07, 2009 8:22 am)

Yikes. I'm not a fan of Smart cars myself, but that's sad. I hope nobody was hurt.
 
The sad part is that the first one was probably loaded with 2 or 3 decent sized guys without a forklift. I think they're just too small for our roadways and the number of huge land barges that are floating around. I wouldn't feel safe in one.
 
I'm not talking down about choices that people make about what they drive. That's their prerogative, but something that small is not Smart (pardon the pun). They're barely more visible than a motorcycle.
 
/end off topic discussion.
 
Nice finds with the pics though.
#549 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [morin2] by explorerx4
Nov 07, 2009 (11:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: morin2 (Nov 06, 2009 6:53 pm)

there numbers are measured this way:
 
In 2006 small pickups experienced 116 driver deaths per million registered vehicles
 
I see that as a fairly meaningless stat. some people drive 5,000 miles a year, others 50,000. i would prefer passenger miles, like airline safety is measured.
#550 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [plekto] by british_rover
Nov 07, 2009 (12:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Nov 06, 2009 8:20 pm)

Those oil 4Runners don't even have side impact door beams. That is a big problem in a side impact and putting some nerf bars or rock crushers on the side isn't going to help.
#551 of 551
Re: Have to weigh in on the small truck suggestions [british_rover] by plekto
Nov 07, 2009 (4:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Nov 07, 2009 12:52 pm)

I guarantee 3 inch diameter steel tubes bolted and then welded directly to the frame at the height of a car bumper will count as "side impact protection". The problem with automobiles is that the bumpers of the SUVs and trucks and so on are right at their window height. Every car since the 60s pretty much has had some sort of reinforcement in the doors to keep them from completely crushing in, but the impact has to be on the door and not at the window.
 
The sliders/nerf bars are 18 inches high and the front bumper is 40 inches at the top and covers the entire area in the middle. True, the sides aren't protected versus a truck like mine, but I also have a roll bar installed right behind the front seats(there's one in the bed as well - came that way). I figure if they get lucky enough to hit me at the right angle with a SUV where they don't hit the nerf or roll bars first, my number was up anyways. Roling over while off-roading was my #1 concern, so I put the extra protection in for a couple of hundred dollars.

Messages Page 56 of 56
1
...
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement