Ask the Car People.SM


Buying a Used 3-Series

758 messages,  Last post on Dec 17, 2012 at 9:34 AM

You are in the BMW 3-Series Forum.

What is this discussion about? BMW M3, BMW 3 Series, Motorsports, Engine, Suspension, Car Buying, Coupe

Messages Page 2 of 77

#3 of 758 Re: What is a better buy: 1999 BMW M3 or 2001 330ci (same mileage each) [fdg07] by div2

Aug 10, 2006 (6:33 am)

Replying to: fdg07 (Aug 08, 2006 3:17 pm)
I think that you need to drive both and make your own decision. An E36 M3 offers a more visceral and involving driving experience, but don't take my word for it-similar comments were made by Car and Driver, Car, BMW Car, and Roundel, just to name a few. Since an E36 will cost less you might well have more money available for performance upgrades. On the other hand, while I don't know about the "netter" looks, the E46 is more sophisticated and offers more luxurious touches, but it is still a fine sports sedan. It all depends on your priorities. Ya pays yer money...

#4 of 758 Re: What is a better buy: 1999 BMW M3 or 2001 330ci (same mileage each) [fdg07] by gordonwd

Aug 10, 2006 (6:42 am)

Replying to: fdg07 (Aug 08, 2006 3:17 pm)
I would also expect that the M3 has been flogged harder than the 330. People don't generally buy M3s unless they expect to drive them hard, or else why buy an M at all?

#5 of 758 Re: What is a better buy: 1999 BMW M3 or 2001 330ci (same mileage each) [quattroporte12] by div2

Aug 10, 2006 (7:07 am)

Replying to: quattroporte12 (Aug 09, 2006 10:19 pm)
Interesting observations. How many E36 M3s have you driven? What about E46 330is?

#6 of 758 Re: What is a better buy: 1999 BMW M3 or 2001 330ci (same mileage each) [fdg07] by Mr_Shiftright HOST

Aug 10, 2006 (9:06 am)

Replying to: fdg07 (Aug 08, 2006 3:17 pm)
I think the 330 is the better buy. There's no reason why an used M car should cost so much--historically they are not particulary good at holding their value, asking prices notwithstanding. And an old BMW out of warranty makes a person nervous anyway. If you could find a certified 330, maybe a 2002 and up, that would be the way to go.

#7 of 758 Re: What is a better buy: 1999 BMW M3 or 2001 330ci (same mileage each) [div2] by quattroporte12

Aug 10, 2006 (11:13 am)

Replying to: div2 (Aug 10, 2006 7:07 am)
I have not driven the E36 M3, i know only what i have read and observed. in MY opinion, i would go with the 330ci.

#9 of 758 Re: What is a better buy: 1999 BMW M3 or 2001 330ci (same mileage each) [quattroporte12] by fdg07

Aug 10, 2006 (3:01 pm)

Replying to: quattroporte12 (Aug 10, 2006 11:13 am)
Oh ok thank you very much for your opinions, its taking a lead on me, so far 330ci sounds like a better buy, anymore comments will be very appreciated! Wouldnt the m3 have better handling or better tranny or brakes then the 330ci? I mean arent the mechanical parts of the m3 made to handle more power then the 330ci if I put on lets say a chip or turbo?? im also wondering which one has the better braking and which one requires more maintanance and is more expensive to repair and maintane despite its age( I know a 99 is not going to last as long)? thanks guys, this is what makes this a great site, your support!!!

#10 of 758 Re: What is a better buy: 1999 BMW M3 or 2001 330ci (same mileage each) [fdg07] by fdg07

Aug 10, 2006 (3:05 pm)

Replying to: fdg07 (Aug 10, 2006 3:01 pm)
Would a chip(add more power) lower the life of the engine such as the supercharger does? would a turbo lower the life of an engine as well?

#11 of 758 Re: What is a better buy: 1999 BMW M3 or 2001 330ci (same mileage each) [fdg07] by quattroporte12

Aug 10, 2006 (3:28 pm)

Replying to: fdg07 (Aug 10, 2006 3:01 pm)
The m3 is made to handle more power, but, you have to remember that it is a generation older than the 330ci, which means when the 3 series was redesigned, the parts in the new one were much better than the old generation's parts, which means the parts in the 330 are probably as good or better than the ones in the old generation m3 because of the new technology. I dont know much about chips or turbos so i cant help you there, but i would say that the m3 is going to be more expensive and harder to reapair 1) because it is older (may have to order parts for it, versus having them in stock) and 2) because it was probably driven harder than the 330ci and could have much more wear. You should look at each car's technical specs to find out about braking, but, once again, the 330ci probably has equal or better braking due to its newer technology.

#12 of 758 Re: What is a better buy: 1999 BMW M3 or 2001 330ci (same mileage each) [fdg07] by div2

Aug 10, 2006 (6:51 pm)

Replying to: fdg07 (Aug 10, 2006 3:01 pm)
Wouldnt the m3 have better handling or better tranny or brakes then the 330ci?
 
Yes, the handling and braking of the E36 M3 is better. It is also less "idiot proof" than the 330i; you have to know what you are doing in order to extract the best performance from it.
 
I mean arent the mechanical parts of the m3 made to handle more power then the 330ci if I put on lets say a chip or turbo??
 
Almost any vehicle will need a brake upgrade if you add forced induction. The E36 M3 is no exception. The best bang for your buck would be a Conforti Shark Injector and CAI.
 
im also wondering which one has the better braking and which one requires more maintanance and is more expensive to repair and maintane despite its age
 
Maintenance and repair costs will be roughly similar as, unlike the E30 and E46 variants, the US E36 M3 uses a 3.2 liter version of the garden variety BMW six cylinder engine.

Messages Page 2 of 77

To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement