Sign In Join 



Electric Vehicle Pros & Cons

1586 messages,  Last post on Oct 23, 2009 at 4:19 PM

You are in the Electric Vehicles Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 6 of 160
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
160
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#43 of 1586
GREET Software by prm2000
Aug 05, 2006 (1:24 pm)
Reply
I just stumbled across something very cool. It should help with the discussion on emissions. I just loaded it up and haven't done much with it yet, but I thought I would pass it along.
 
http://www.transportation.anl.gov/software/GREET/
#44 of 1586
Battery power by 3745
Aug 08, 2006 (2:54 am)
Reply
I've posted this link before on other Edmunds chats but I think it belongs here.
 
Electric cars with their batteries charged by nuclear power stations are the only way to go. The link describes safe nuclear generating plants.
 
http://www.eskom.co.za/nuclear_energy/pebble_bed/pebble_bed.html
#45 of 1586
Re: Battery power [3745] by tpe
Aug 08, 2006 (3:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: 3745 (Aug 08, 2006 2:54 am)

Electric cars with their batteries charged by nuclear power stations are the only way to go
 
I agree that it is a very good way to go and far superior to generating electricity from coal. My objection to expanding nuclear energy has to do with the fact that we live in a world with terrorists and that's not going to change. Nuclear plants and their waste materials are going to be very attractive to these people that want to do us harm. The cost to provide security for these facilities will be considerable and will only increase as the threat becomes more sophisticated.
 
I think from a domestic security perspective we are best off generating our electricity on the most local level possible. Homeowners producing their own electricity through wind, solar, etc., being tied together in a small community grid.
#46 of 1586
Re: Battery power [tpe] by 3745
Aug 08, 2006 (4:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Aug 08, 2006 3:56 am)

You forget that other less friendly countries to America are also developing nuclear power stations - see my link. Terrorists could just as well get nuclear material from them.
 
Meanwhile, America lags behind. Solar and wind power can only provide a small percentage of power needed. It is also unreliable and dependant on the weather. Coal mines and their environmental impact are more dangerous than nuclear power. Coal fired power stations pollute the atmosphere. How many coal miners have been killed in America and how many people have died due to nuclear accidents in this country?
#47 of 1586
Re: Battery power [3745] by snakeweasel
Aug 08, 2006 (5:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: 3745 (Aug 08, 2006 2:54 am)

Electric cars with their batteries charged by nuclear power stations are the only way to go.
 
Somewhere someone will come up with a system that charges a battery or capacitor in someones garage using solar panels which the electric car can be plugged into at night.
#48 of 1586
Re: Battery power [snakeweasel] by 3745
Aug 08, 2006 (5:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: snakeweasel (Aug 08, 2006 5:12 am)

"Somewhere someone will come up with a system that charges a battery or capacitor in someones garage using solar panels which the electric car can be plugged into at night".
 
Fact of the matter is that solar power chargers do exist. Cell phone companies use them to charge their remote station batteries as one example. Solar panels are expensive to make and the manufacturing process is environmentaly dirty. It's also no good to plug into the solar charger at night. It's just not going to work!
 
Bear in mind we are talking about millions of vehicle batteries that would have to be charged if and when a change to battery power took place.
 
Super capacitors are an alternative to conventional batteries and at this moment you can buy super capacitor batteries for your flashlight. There are claims that they outperform standard rechargable flash light batteries and are much lighter.
#49 of 1586
Re: Battery power [snakeweasel] by tpe
Aug 08, 2006 (5:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: snakeweasel (Aug 08, 2006 5:12 am)

Somewhere someone will come up with a system that charges a battery or capacitor in someones garage using solar panels which the electric car can be plugged into at night.
 
Its already being done. Tesla Motors website states that they have an arrangement with solar installers to provide customers with this capability. If you live in a sunny climate like the desert Southwest this could be a very attractive way to go especially when the tax breaks are considered.
 
While I'm sure the initial investment won't be cheap this represents something the individual can do to make himself energy independent. Expanding nuclear energy may be a good idea but it is something clearly outside your control.
#50 of 1586
Re: Battery power [tpe] by prm2000
Aug 08, 2006 (6:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Aug 08, 2006 5:55 am)

My parents just installed a PV array that will produce more juice than their electric RAV-4 uses. They did it more to make a point and to help suppport the technology than for maximim cost effectiveness. From this point forward theif driving will produce zero emissions. It will take 10-15 years to pay for itself (depending on the future cost of electricity).
 
Early on, Governor Arnold talked about a grand plan to put solar cells on all new houses. I haven't heard anything about that lately, so I don't know where it stands. Once PV cells get thin, and flexible (which the new ones are), and cheap, they make a lot of sense because they distribute the generation across the grid.
#51 of 1586
Sylvia by rorr
Aug 08, 2006 (10:13 am)
Reply
THANKS!
 
Well, THAT'LL certainly 'clean up' the other discussion....
#52 of 1586
Re: Battery power [prm2000] by tpe
Aug 08, 2006 (1:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: prm2000 (Aug 08, 2006 6:34 am)

I think that California's plan to install PV systems on 1 million homes is still going forward. Its kind of interesting because the first time this proposal went to California's legislation it was held up by the union that represents electricians. Apparently they wanted some provision that required all work to be done by an expensive, unionized electrician. Well "The Terminator" figured out a way to bypass this obstacle. He went straight to the utility companies to pay for this program so it didn't need the same legislative approval.
 
Some of the current government subsidies for PV install are, IMO, somewhat misguided. The global demand for PV panels is far outstripping manufacturing capacity and these subsidies are only agravating the situation. The result is that over the last 2 years the cost per watt has actually increased. The positive side is that manufacturers are increasing capacity at a rapid pace but this might have occurred even with slightly lower subsidies.
 
The comment that millions of EV owners charging their batteries is going to overtax the grid is unfounded. For one thing it will probably take at least 10 years for there to even be 1 million EVs on the road. Also, the people that operate our nation's electricity grid welcome these vehicles. I don't pretend to understand how this works but apparently it creates the potential for load levelling, which has a positive impact. Not to mention your vehicle can now be an emergency back-up power supply for your home.

Messages Page 6 of 160
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
160
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement