Sign In Join 



Electric Vehicle Pros & Cons

1586 messages,  Last post on Oct 23, 2009 at 4:19 PM

You are in the Electric Vehicles Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 3 of 159
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
159
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#20 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [prm2000] by rorr
Aug 03, 2006 (2:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: prm2000 (Aug 03, 2006 2:46 pm)

"Even dirty coal is marginally better than burning gasoline in an ICE"
 
Is it? I'd like to see the figures that support that.
#21 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [rorr] by tpe
Aug 03, 2006 (3:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Aug 03, 2006 2:44 pm)

I agree that solarbuzz is very pro-solar.
 
It is really impossible to come up with an accurate cost per kWh since it is dependent on your location. A solar panel in Phoenix is going to produce a lot more electricity than one located in Seattle even though their costs are the same.
 
You seem to be knowledgeable in these things so you must realize that one of the factors driving up the cost of solar energy is the demand for PV cells is currently outstripping manufacturing capacity. Countries like Japan and Germany are very aggressively pursuing solar energy and pretty much buying up the global supply of PV panels. Maybe they aren't as smart as we are.
 
In 2004 the US installed 90,000 Megawatts in PV solar capacity bringing total capacity to 365,000 Megawatts. Essentially 25% of the total was installed in one year. In 2005 another 105,000 Megawatts was installed. This represents nothing short of explosive growth. The fact that it has yet to make a dent in our energy composition is because it started out at 1/10 of 1 percent. BTW, these stats come from solarbuzz, a source that you obviously feel is reputable.
 
Where can you buy electricity for 3-5 cents per kWh? The fact that utilities might be able to generate electricity at this cost is irrelevant to the consumer that now has the potential to generate his own electricity.
#22 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [rorr] by prm2000
Aug 03, 2006 (4:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Aug 03, 2006 2:50 pm)

"Even dirty coal is marginally better than burning gasoline in an ICE"
  
Is it? I'd like to see the figures that support that.
 
Here is a Canadian study:
http://evworld.com/library/CanadaFuelCycle.pdf
 
"battery electric vehicles operating in provinces which rely primarily on electricity generated from coal, will produce 55% to 59% less greenhouse gas emissions compared to a gasoline internal combustion engine vehicle, and will produce between 80% and 92% less total other (non-CO2) emissions depending on the specific type of coal used."
#23 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [tpe] by prm2000
Aug 03, 2006 (4:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Aug 03, 2006 3:34 pm)

"Where can you buy electricity for 3-5 cents per kWh? The fact that utilities might be able to generate electricity at this cost is irrelevant to the consumer that now has the potential to generate his own electricity."
 
Ditto that. I just paid over 19 cents per kWh for a good part of my bill last month (the rate steps up with usage). That makes the 27 cents per kWh for a sunny location not sound so out of line.
#24 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [prm2000] by michael2003
Aug 04, 2006 (3:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: prm2000 (Aug 03, 2006 4:35 pm)

Thanks to everyone for the wonderful insights and information. I definitely feel better about considering the purchase of an all electric vehicle.
 
Based on your comments, I feel safe to conclude:
1. Electric is less polluting and will continue to improve,
2. Battery technology will continue to improve to allow for longer range and less interruption for re-charge,
3. Those of us that are able to generate our own power will have an increased motivation to do so, which should also help drive down the price,
4. Gas prices will increase to the point that even those that would prefer to keep their old polluting vehicles, would have to let their wallets dictate a cheaper solution.
#25 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [tpe] by rorr
Aug 04, 2006 (5:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Aug 03, 2006 3:34 pm)

"Where can you buy electricity for 3-5 cents per kWh?"
 
You can't. But you are ENTIRELY missing my point.
 
If one buys an electric vehicle, and PLUGS INTO THE GRID, the odds that the electricity they use will be from solar PV will be essentially ZERO.
 
Why? Because utility companies can produce electricity all day long at 3-5 cents per kWh using fossil fuels.
 
Now, if one were to install their OWN set of PV cells (which is where all the explosive growth that you mentioned is coming from), and THEN plugged their electric car in, this would be the 'cleaner' solution.
 
Please understand, I'm not AGAINST electric cars. I'm just saying that those who go that route and pull energy off the public grid MAY NOT be reducing pollution/demand for fossil fuels as much as they think.
#26 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [rorr] by tpe
Aug 04, 2006 (6:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Aug 04, 2006 5:10 am)

I'm just saying that those who go that route and pull energy off the public grid MAY NOT be reducing pollution/demand for fossil fuels as much as they think
 
I agree with that. The terms "green" or "clean" are not absolute. It would be more accurate for a person driving an EV to state that he has made a "greener" choice. He is still impacting the environment, just not as much as if he was driving an ICE.
#27 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [prm2000] by rorr
Aug 04, 2006 (6:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: prm2000 (Aug 03, 2006 4:35 pm)

Thanks for posting the link to the Electric Vehicle of Canada link comparing emmissions of ICEs to that of power plants supplying the electricity for replacement EVs.
 
I'm going to dig a little deeper on this issue but I have this comment to make regarding one of their assumptions:
 
They've comparing the emmissions from various types of power sources supplying electricity for EVs against the vehicle emmissions from an AVERAGE fleet of cars using ICEs.
 
Is this a valid assumption to make? How likely are owners of large trucks/SUVs to move to EVs? And how likely are the owners of EVs to be migrating from current LEV and ULEV cars?
 
I'm going to try and dig up the emissions numbers for the vehicles which are actually USED by those most likely to make the step from ICEs to pure EVs. I'll then compare THOSE emissions numbers to the emission numbers used in that analysis.
#28 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [tpe] by rorr
Aug 04, 2006 (6:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Aug 04, 2006 6:22 am)

"It would be more accurate for a person driving an EV to state that he has made a "greener" choice. He is still impacting the environment, just not as much as if he was driving an ICE."
 
Again, we don't know that.
 
The EV study reference above compared the emissions from various power plants to the emissions of AVERAGE vehicles.
 
If one is already driving a LEV or ULEV Honda (or perhaps a hybrid like the Prius), if THOSE people make the jump to EV, what is the comparison of their current ICE emissions to that of a power plant?
 
In all honesty: who is more likely to make the jump to a 100% EV - the current owner of a Prius or the owner of a 10-year old Chevy Malibu?
#29 of 1586
Re: Going the distance [rorr] by prm2000
Aug 04, 2006 (6:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Aug 04, 2006 5:10 am)

"Please understand, I'm not AGAINST electric cars. I'm just saying that those who go that route and pull energy off the public grid MAY NOT be reducing pollution/demand for fossil fuels as much as they think."
 
The 50% of electricity that is coal generated might not reduce emissions as much as people think (although it still reduces emissions), but the other 50% of generated electricity would reduce emissions dramatically.
 
In this whole discussion I don't hear enough talk about how electric cars would dramatically reduce the amount of oil we import. At the moment the national security issue is the most important factor to me. The increased efficiency and dramatically reduced emissions are gravy.
 
I think it is criminal that politicians help Detroit and Big Oil to suppress the electric car, and then spend many billions to fight foreign wars to stabilize the middle east oil fields.

Messages Page 3 of 159
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
159
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement