Sign In Join 



Electric Vehicle Pros & Cons

1586 messages,  Last post on Oct 23, 2009 at 4:19 PM

You are in the Electric Vehicles Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 150 of 159
1
...
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
...
159
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1487 of 1586
Re: Break even [snakeweasel] by apeweek
Nov 04, 2007 (7:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: snakeweasel (Nov 04, 2007 7:11 pm)

...Unless you can provide a source for this I will presume that this is just propaganda...
 
Here are a few sources. Below are a collection of studies that look at the entire process, well-to-wheels, of an electric vehicle:
 
http://sherryboschert.com/Downloads/Emissions%5B9%5D.pdf
 
As to EV batteries, Li-Ion batteries (current battery tech) are not considered an environmental hazard. Here's a source from the Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality:
 
http://www.deq.state.or.us/lq/pubs/docs/hw/Success/OnToTechnology.pdf
 
A quote from the above: "The lithium-ion battery on-the-other-hand, is always in solution and therefore a lithium salt (not metal) which is non-reactive. "
 
AltairNano even claims their batteries are biodegradable.
 
...Not baseless at all, electricity has to be created and its not going to be created cleanly.
 
I cannot claim that coal is clean. However, because of the efficiencies of electricity generation, transmission, and use by the EV, that much less pollution - just a fraction - is generated overall. I quoted a study that showed this.
 
Here's why this is so: gasoline has lots of energy density, but many inefficiencies are present in its transportation, refining, and use. Fuel burns much more efficiently in a large powerplant than it does in your car. Sending the energy by wire to your car (about 97% efficient) also beats trucking fuel all over the country. And the motor in an EV is over 90% efficient as well.
 
Did you know lots of electricity is used to refine gasoline? Another interesting fact is that large powerplants operate at very low efficiencies overnight, when demand drops - wasting tons of fuel, because they can't be turned off. Charging EVs overnight can use that wasted fuel - without increasing pollution.
 
If you still disagree, post some evidence of your own. I would love to continue this discussion.
#1488 of 1586
Re: Here's a CON [gagrice] by apeweek
Nov 04, 2007 (7:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Nov 04, 2007 7:27 pm)

...Do you have any plans to upgrade your van to Thunder Sky batteries?
 
I have considered it. However, I decided that because of the age of this vehicle, a large investment of time and money would not be prudent. In my next electric vehicle, definitely.
 
One of the things slowing the adoption of li-ions by the hobbyist community is that fact that these types of batteries require much tighter charging and discharging management to remain safe. That requires some serious engineering work, and not everybody is up to it. A few people are working on battery management systems that will become products for sale to hobbyists - when we all standardize on one of these, you'll see more hobbyists using li-ions.
#1489 of 1586
Re: Here's a CON [apeweek] by tpe
Nov 05, 2007 (12:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: apeweek (Nov 04, 2007 7:38 pm)

Did you notice that the deal Tesla Motors made with Think Nordic to provide battery packs has apparently fallen through? They have decided to go with EnerDel as the battery provider.
 
enerdel batteries
#1490 of 1586
Re: Break even [tpe] by daysailer
Nov 06, 2007 (4:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Nov 03, 2007 4:23 pm)

"Is it possible that some people like to burn less gas simply because they think it is a good thing to do, like recycling? I don't know why people who are willing to pay a premium for being more environmentally friendly have to defend this position while people that pay a premium for more power or a European nameplate don't."
 
It is laudable that some people are willing to pay a large premium for environmental reasons. But that won't drive a large market and thereby substantially affect the environment since most people are not wealthy enough to ignore the economics of such a substantial purchase as an automobile.
#1491 of 1586
Re: Break even [daysailer] by tpe
Nov 06, 2007 (6:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: daysailer (Nov 06, 2007 4:17 am)

When I look around at the cars on the road I don't get the sense that people are buying the most affordable vehicle that satisfies their needs. It seems to me that a lot of people are spending a considerable amount more to satisfy their desires. Just like some people have a desire for power, convertibles, German nameplates, gigantic SUVs, etc., other people have a desire to be environmentally friendly.
#1492 of 1586
Re: Break even [tpe] by gagrice
Nov 06, 2007 (6:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Nov 06, 2007 6:30 am)

I think what you are saying is correct. The fact that so many people paid over MSRP for the Prius would bare out your point. They are not the average buyer however. All the vehicles you mention are niche vehicles. They appeal to a small segment of the population. I think that will be the case when and if we ever see usable EVs. I think I read that 80% of the Camry's sold are plain Jane 4 cylinder cars.
 
With the dollar falling off the scale and the economy faltering I think the environmental buyer will also think twice before spending the extra money, just to do his part.
#1493 of 1586
Re: Break even [tpe] by daysailer
Nov 06, 2007 (7:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Nov 06, 2007 6:30 am)

But EV dreamers suggest that buyers will BOTH abandon their desires AND pay an environmental premium. I may be cynical, but I don't expect that to happen.
#1494 of 1586
Re: Break even [daysailer] by tpe
Nov 06, 2007 (7:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: daysailer (Nov 06, 2007 7:10 am)

You're missing my point. EV drivers will be satisfying their desire to be more environmentally friendly, not abandoning it. What is the motivation that drives people who recycle? It certainly isn't financial reward and there is time invested, so if you equate time to money then it's a similarly bad investment. Yet a lot of people do this. Are they idiots?
#1495 of 1586
Re: Break even [gagrice] by tpe
Nov 06, 2007 (7:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Nov 06, 2007 6:58 am)

With the dollar falling off the scale and the economy faltering I think the environmental buyer will also think twice before spending the extra money, just to do his part.

 
The dollar's fall is one of the big factors currently pushing up the price of oil. If this continues it will make alternatives to burning gas more attractive to the group that is purely driven by the "break even" mentality.
#1496 of 1586
Re: Break even [daysailer] by snakeweasel
Nov 06, 2007 (5:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: daysailer (Nov 06, 2007 7:10 am)

I may be cynical, but I don't expect that to happen.
 
You are not being cynical and its not going to happen. People tend to spend in such a way as to maximize their utility for the least amount of money.

Messages Page 150 of 159
1
...
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
...
159
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement