Sign In Join 



What's the best vehicle for my needs?

1145 messages,  Last post on Sep 17, 2009 at 12:59 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying


Messages Page 93 of 115
1
...
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
...
115
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#917 of 1145
Turbocharged cars by demigawd
Jun 24, 2009 (6:39 am)
Reply
Say, I've been reading up on turbocharged cars. I like the idea of a car with the fuel economy of a 4-Cyl, but the power of a V6 or V8 - BUT, I've heard mentions of a "turbo lag". I figure it's not a big deal when accelerating from a stop. But is turbo lag going to negatively affect my ability to pass in and out of traffic quickly? I'm a lot more concerned about navigating high speed highway traffic than zooming up the fast lane, so I'm not sure if turbo is the way to go in that case.
#918 of 1145
Re: Turbocharged cars [demigawd] by corvette
Jun 24, 2009 (7:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: demigawd (Jun 24, 2009 6:39 am)

Depends on the engine. VW's 1.8T engine had pretty noticeable turbo lag, but the 2.0T does not. Also, I didn't notice lag with Volvo's light-pressure 2.5 liter turbo five-cylinder.
#919 of 1145
Re: Turbocharged cars [demigawd] by qbrozen
Jun 24, 2009 (9:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: demigawd (Jun 24, 2009 6:39 am)

Turbo lag only affects the car from a stop in most cases. Once the engine is spinning at a couple thousand RPMs, the lag isn't there, so passing is not an issue.
 
However, "the economy of a 4-cyl with the power of a V6 or V8" is marketing BS, for the most part. Power costs gas, no matter how it is achieved. For example, a WRX STi gets 19mpg combined (300hp turbo 4 AWD). A 335ix gets 19mpg combined (300hp turbo 6 AWD). A G35X gets 19mpg combined (300hp NA 6 AWD).
#920 of 1145
Re: Turbocharged cars [qbrozen] by jeffyscott
Jun 24, 2009 (9:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jun 24, 2009 9:10 am)

I would assume that if you actually use that power, you will not get the 4 cyl mpg and if you do not use the power, why'd you buy the turbo?
#921 of 1145
Re: Turbocharged cars [jeffyscott] by sebring95
Jun 24, 2009 (9:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Jun 24, 2009 9:23 am)

Unless you're driving the car at 9/10ths all the time, the turbo 4 should return better economy. I could get along fine with one because most of my commute is normal 55-70mph stuff, but I occasionally need to blast around someone on a short passing zone.
#922 of 1145
Re: Turbocharged cars [qbrozen] by demigawd
Jun 24, 2009 (11:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jun 24, 2009 9:10 am)

Wow, that's great reassurance. So Turbo is actually a benefit for passing in and out of traffic, rather than a detriment because of lag, if I'm understanding you correctly.
 
I've committed to hunting down G35x's, but I also need to keep some of my options open. Assuming I abandoned the absolute requirement for an AWD, but instead wanted a compact turbo car (sub-7 0-60) with a good reputation for maintenance and good handling in wintery Chicago conditions, what would you recommend? I was thinking something in the mold of a 1999 Saab 9-3 turbo that a friend of mine used to have. He had it in a hatchback and I really enjoyed riding in it. It could park easily because of the size, but had a great interior and could haul-ass. I've heard that the newer Saabs have really lost their reputation for quality, which prevents me from going for a 2003+ model. The fast Jettas fit that mold too (and, according to a post here, handle well in the winter), but I've heard bad things about THEIR reliability and maintenance as well. So is there a car that fits that mold but retains high reliability and reasonable maintenance costs?
#923 of 1145
Re: Turbocharged cars [demigawd] by qbrozen
Jun 24, 2009 (11:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: demigawd (Jun 24, 2009 11:33 am)

So Turbo is actually a benefit for passing in and out of traffic, rather than a detriment because of lag, if I'm understanding you correctly.
 
Yes.
 
I can't suggest either Saab or VW as reliable vehicles.
 
I would suggest Volvo, however. I don't think it will be quite as reliable as Infiniti, but I've had good luck with them. My S70 T5 was one of the best vehicles I ever owned. Was great in the snow, the high-pressure turbo made it a blast to drive, and it was supremely comfortable. However, I did have to put some money into it at around the 100k mile mark (suspension, ABS module, turbo oil seal), but I don't think that's unreasonable, especially since I drove it so hard.
 
And, keeping on that turbo vs NA thing, I netted right around 24 mpg with the S70 during its stay with me. That was a 236hp turbo 5-cyl 2.3 liter. The 3.5liter 280hp 350Z that followed used to return 25.5mpg. The 3.2liter V6 Accord after that was 26.5mpg. So, again, turbo'ing a smaller engine does not automatically equal better mileage.
#924 of 1145
Re: Turbocharged cars [qbrozen] by demigawd
Jun 24, 2009 (11:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jun 24, 2009 11:43 am)

I googled some photos of the S70 T5. It looks around the same size as the G35, possibly larger. Is there a smaller Volvo with the same or better performance?
#925 of 1145
Re: Turbocharged cars [demigawd] by qbrozen
Jun 24, 2009 (12:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: demigawd (Jun 24, 2009 11:56 am)

There is the 2004.5 and up S40 T5. Can also be had with AWD, but I don't see it as necessary when it is FWD normally. I would think you could find an '04.5 or '05 S40 T5 FWD in your pricerange.
 
The S60 is the model that replaced the S70. The S60 is a tad tighter inside than the G35, but not by much. In the S60, when i have the driver's seat set to where I'd be comfortable, nobody can get behind me. In the G, it is still tight behind me, but someone could get their legs in there. I don't know how the outside dimensions compare, however.
 
I was considering suggesting an S60R for you, but finding a clean one in your range may be tough. Plus, I went through this choice myself (S60R vs G35X) and bought the Infiniti. The S60R was more appealing, but the G35X won for what I anticipate will be lower lifetime operating costs.
 
Even now, though, just 1 year into my '04 G35X ownership, I find myself wondering what it would be like to own an '06 S60R now. ;b
#926 of 1145
Re: Turbocharged cars [qbrozen] by demigawd
Jun 24, 2009 (12:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jun 24, 2009 12:04 pm)

ha, I think we have similar tastes in cars. After you mentioned the S70, I started looking up the entire Volvo line and came upon the S60R, which seems VERY enticing to me. It sounds like from what you're saying that the S60R is more expensive than the G35x, but looking at the prices used, it appears that the S60R has a substantial discount (the advantage of worse resale value, it seems). The G35x's I've seen in my area average about $17,000 for a 2005 model at 40,000 miles. The S60R models with the same specs average about $14,000. The cost of ownership appears to be similar. So I'll have to add that to my list of things to check out.
 
What do you guys know about Evolve? I've seen some mentions of an S60R Evolve edition, and it sounds like some kind of modification package. Any information about it? The price? Upside? Downside?

Messages Page 93 of 115
1
...
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
...
115
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement