Sign In Join


What's the best vehicle for my needs?

968 messages,  Last post on Jul 03, 2009 at 10:55 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying


Messages Page 97 of 97
1
...
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#959 of 968
Re: family vehicle [carstryke] by erniesdad
Jul 03, 2009 (7:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: carstryke (Jul 02, 2009 4:34 pm)

They're Auto, not a stick, but a ford flex or ford edge would be a pretty good fit, particularly the flex, though that's at the ragged edge of what you are looking for pricewise. The flex doesn't look much like a minivan or SUV, more like a tall station wagon. All it needs is the fake wood paneling.
#960 of 968
Re: family vehicle [erniesdad] by fezo
Jul 03, 2009 (8:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: erniesdad (Jul 03, 2009 7:19 am)

Maybe this topic would be more accurately titled What's the best vehicle for my wants.
 
We come to this one again and again. The best vehicle to do what you want to do is a minivan - with the exception of the manual transmission part which is nearly impossible to find in one. Poor minivans have gotten such a reputation...
 
How about a Mazda 5? Call it a CUV or something. You can get it in a stick. Smaller than what I think of as a minivan but probably OK for 3 kids.
 
I really like the idea of a Flex but they somehow seem overpriced to me.
#961 of 968
Re: family vehicle [fezo] by plekto
Jul 03, 2009 (9:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Jul 03, 2009 8:14 am)

Wait a minute - let's look at his actual list:
 
****
loves- Manual transmission, cargo space
hates- minivans
kids 3- 2 carseats 1 booster seat
***
OK - he has two requirements, manual aside. (if he's asking for manual only, trust me - he's a manual purist most likely and will sacrifice almost anything to keep this desire) Obviously he'd not wish to do that...
 
1 - it needs a wide rear seat or a third row. Compact is out, but *some* midisze and large vehicles can fit 2 car seats and a booster in the middle position.
 
2 - wants cargo space or at least the ability to put a full trip's worth of luggage and stuff in the back with the 3 kids in it.
 
That means he wants a truck, real SUV, or a large sedan. If he wanted automatic, I'd have recommended something like a large sedan, but that's a very small list with manual. Three cars, actually - the Camry with the 4 cylinder engine, the Volvo S60/(or wagon), and the last generation Altima. That's it for cars.
 
So let's move to smaller SUVs that would work. The Jeep Patriot is technically a minivan/softroader but doesn't look or drive like one. The Wrangler Unlimited, of course, oozes coolness and fits his every button. The RAV4 can be had with manual, though it's a TIGHT fit for 3 kids.
 
My gut still says a small double-cab pickup. A crew cab with V6 and manual can be had from some of the makers. 4WD for bad weather. Almost all of them are reliable as can be, since it's 90% of the time the automatics that fail and cost tons of money.(ie - Jeep with automatic is no good - manual is so simple even Chrysler can't mess it up). The same goes for any of the makers, even Ford and GM.
 
3/4 of the makers sell a small pickup with a double-cab and manual as an option. So there's tons of choices as well. If you want to, get a shell for the cargo area.(oh - plus you can tow with them better than a SUV) Plus, there's no minivan or yuppie image, either. Yet you are up high above traffic unlike a car.
 
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.jsp?ct=u&car_id=264118920
Hard to find, but a few crew cabs with manual were made/special ordered.(though 99% chance it's a V6 and not a 4 as the ad states)
 
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.jsp?ct=u&car_id=262079084
There were a few Tacomas made like this as well, and I think you can STILL special order one/have one built new for you like this. The advantage here is that it doesn't weigh as much as a full size pickup or SUV and is easier to park.(if just barely - mostly due to better visibility of your corners)
 
The Nissan Frontier, the Ford Ranger, and the Dodge all can or could be had in the last few years with manual and a V6 and a double/crew cab. Though, you might have to get a certified one in some cases. GM stopped making trucks with manuals entirely a year or two ago, other than their full-size work chassis, IIRC.
#962 of 968
Re: family vehicle [plekto] by carstryke
Jul 03, 2009 (9:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Jul 03, 2009 9:04 am)

thank you all for your guys responses they were helpful.
#963 of 968
Re: family vehicle [carstryke] by sebring95
Jul 03, 2009 (10:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: carstryke (Jul 03, 2009 9:23 am)

Just scratch the manual transmission off the list along with the goofy recommendation by the other poster for a truck (as a family vehicle...please). I've got a nice selection of vehicles sitting here to pick from. Odyssey is best familiy vehicle bar none but you have an aversion to them so that's your loss. I pretty much haven't seen an SUV or Minivan that was sexy, so I lump them in the "ugly but functional category either way.
 
I have a crew-cab Tundra and it's a lousy family vehicle...can't imagine going to a Tacoma or similar small fry. 4Runner might be ok...(wife has GX470) but the back seat with 3 carseats/boosters is a cramped mess. 3rd row is trash on most of these mid-size SUV type things.
 
You might be able to get into a BMW 5-series wagon with a manual transmission, but back seat will still be tight.
 
GMC Acadia/Buick Enclave is about the best crossover type non-minivan that actually has decent space AND easy access to 3rd row AND cargo capacity. Might be able to grab a lower end used model in your price range. Ford Flex is interesting but just as compromied as the others when it comes down to it.
#964 of 968
Re: family vehicle [sebring95] by plekto
Jul 03, 2009 (7:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sebring95 (Jul 03, 2009 10:26 am)

Gah. Tundras are huge bloated behemoths. But a crew cab midsize truck is perfectly fine inside and every bit as decent and spacious as a SUV's passenger area. Lighter and easier to drive as well. A 4Runner is a huge bloated whale by comparison to most of these things. But he has to try to fit the seats in. Some vehicles are huge for their size and others like the CTS are basically 2+2s due to their somehow cramped rear seats. Some also offer a bench seat up front, which might work as well since the airbags don't cover the center position.
 
He'll have to try and test things out though...
 
If he wants a manual, well, he wants a manual. Automatic plus SUV or Minivan... if it was me, and I feel a lot like this guy I bet, I'd rather gnaw off my left leg and wheel myself off to a retirement home than accept such a bland soulless driving experience.
 
Also, the 3rd row is without a doubt a marketing ploy and not intended for real use in almost every SUV and minivan. Why? Because with the exception of a very few vehicles, it's back of the rear axle and therefore part of the crumple zone itself. If you get rear-ended at 35-40mph, any child in the rear will die barring an act of God.(same problem existed in the past for rear seats in station wagons as well, which is why nobody offers them any more) Many like the 3rd row on the RAV-4 are less than a foot from the rear window.
 
BMW - worst reliability possible other than maybe Mercedes SUVs. And also hugely expensive. I suspect that he wants to stay under $25K if possible Call it a hunch, given the three young kids...
#965 of 968
Re: Sporty look, luxury inside, used, entry level, car seat [exb0] by dash5
Jul 03, 2009 (8:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: exb0 (Jul 01, 2009 11:26 am)

Thanks again to all who responded. Yes exb0 the TL seems to be a good choice too.
 
Right now I'm weighing:
 
Acura TL 2005
Volvo S60 2006
BMW 3 series 2005
 
or... as a wildcard..
 
2007 Toyota Camry XLE
 
Going to check those out. My next question, do I go with one of the above or bite the bullet and spend whatever it costs (within reason) to get a 2007 model with say 20k miles on it.
 
2007 base TL with under 40k miles seems to run $24-25k while a 2005 with 40k miles is under $18,000 in some cases.
 
The 2007 got such great reviews from Edmunds. is 6k worth it for a newer model year and fewer miles? Worth it in the sense of future resale value. Decisions decisions...
#966 of 968
Re: family vehicle [plekto] by sebring95
Jul 03, 2009 (9:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Jul 03, 2009 7:31 pm)

There's no mid-size truck/suv that can seat three car seats across comfortably or at all. I had a Tacoma before the Tundra....I'm familiar. My Tundra is '06 so not as bulky as the '07+ and it seats three across ok.....but it's still a miserable family vehicle in my book. Far better than my Tacoma in most every way, but still a lousy family vehicle.
 
Reliability wasn't on his list and BMW is not that bad and regardless has a good warranty. They can be bought in his price range. Great performance, manual tranny, good cargo room, not a minivan.
#967 of 968
Re: family vehicle [sebring95] by plekto
Jul 03, 2009 (10:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sebring95 (Jul 03, 2009 9:01 pm)

Well, he will have to measure and judge vehicle by vehicle no matter what he does short of buying a Surburban or something with three real rows of seating that are all ahead of the rear axle.(likely a full size SUV)
#968 of 968
Magnaflow by waltergt67
Jul 03, 2009 (10:55 pm)
Reply
I have the magnaflow too and love it, they are cheaper on ebay but I wanted a warranty(the salt on the roads here in winter kills an exhaust) so I got it here. magnaflow 16901, or you can try one of the vendors here, they are allways runnign sales/specials. either way its a great system and very easy to install.
 
LMAO

Messages Page 97 of 97
1
...
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement