Sign In Join 



Toyota Sienna Gas Mileage

248 messages,  Last post on Jun 04, 2009 at 7:11 AM

You are in the Toyota Sienna Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Sienna, Van


Messages Page 22 of 25
1
...
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#209 of 248
Re: Trip computer vs Odometer vs GPS [yatesjo] by ateixeira
Aug 12, 2008 (7:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: yatesjo (Aug 11, 2008 9:45 pm)

Very interesting, because I would consider the GPS distance to be the most accurate.
 
We have a c340, which is less accurate than yours, yet it can tell when I'm in local lanes on the highway. That means it can sense a distance of just a few yards.
 
Perhaps the odometer is conservative since some people will mount bigger tires?
 
The tires are new so it could not be tire wear.
#210 of 248
Re: Trip computer vs Odometer vs GPS [ateixeira] by yatesjo
Aug 12, 2008 (12:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 12, 2008 7:03 am)

I'm seeing the mileage on the odometer showing less than the actual so my odometer will become closer to accurate as the tires wear down/become smaller in circumference. One thing I must keep in mind too is that my actual speed is actually a little bit higher than the speedometer reading- when my needle pointed to 75mph, the GPS put my speed at 76 or 77mph and the speed signs that flash the actual speed tended to agree with the GPS.
 
I agree that the GPS is probably the most reliable measure. The GPS closely agreed with the highway signage distances and is supposed to be accurate to within a few yards. It may miss lane changes or not recognize the differences between the inside and the outside of a curve, but overall those are quite small compared to the length of straight roads I traveled.
#211 of 248
Re: Trip computer vs Odometer vs GPS [yatesjo] by ateixeira
Aug 13, 2008 (6:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: yatesjo (Aug 12, 2008 12:40 pm)

Here's the funny thing - mine is just the opposite.
 
When I set cruise control at 65mph on the speedo, my GPS' dash board function usually reads 64mph.
 
My Nuvi 200W is not as accurate as your c series, which has a better antennae.
#212 of 248
Re: Trip computer vs Odometer vs GPS [ateixeira] by yatesjo
Aug 13, 2008 (9:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 13, 2008 6:05 am)

Do you have the 16" rims or the 17"? I have the 17" rims and was wondering if small differences in the tire sizing may contribute.
 
I chose the C series because of the strong reception. I love this GPS. It made traveling so much less stressful around the big cities and helped me plan where to stop by looking at where rest areas, gas stations and motels ahead of us along our route. Ours also has the MSN service that tells us the traffic, weather and gas prices around the big cities. Going through Phoenix they were working on 101 and the Garmin knew the detour route even before we got there.
 
One glitch in the Garmin was that in a remote area it was wanting to send us down unpaved roads- including one that is not maintained and I knew to be impassable without a serious 4-wheel drive truck. I took the route I knew and it kept telling me to turn off on every gravel road I came to. Strangely enough when I turned off the unpaved road avoidance it plotted the most correct (and paved) route. I would guess that the map people coded the paved and unpaved roads backwards in the areas around Dragoon/Cochise/Pearce, AZ.
#213 of 248
Re: Trip computer vs Odometer vs GPS [ateixeira] by raj1
Aug 13, 2008 (9:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 13, 2008 6:05 am)

My trip computer displayed around 2 mpg less than manual calcualtion in my new xle!! btw, what does instantaneous?? mpg mean?
#214 of 248
Re: Trip computer vs Odometer vs GPS [raj1] by ateixeira
Aug 13, 2008 (9:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: raj1 (Aug 13, 2008 9:28 am)

Yeah, I do have the 16" rims.
 
Instant MPG is an estimate from the computer on the mileage you are getting on-the-fly.
 
I'm sure that's not that accurate, for instance you let off the throttle and it immediately goes to 99mpg, where it seems to top out.
#215 of 248
Re: Trip computer vs Odometer vs GPS [raj1] by yatesjo
Aug 13, 2008 (12:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: raj1 (Aug 13, 2008 9:28 am)

The instantaneous MPG is the speed of the vehicle divided by the rate at which gas is being fed to the engine at that second. It goes down when you press the gas and up when you let off the gas and coast. It is basically a tool for watching what habits consume a lot of fuel and what doesn't. I used it with cruise control to know how hard the engine is working at that moment so I would know if I was on a flat or a gentle up slope or gentle down slope.
#216 of 248
Re: Trip computer vs Odometer vs GPS [yatesjo] by ateixeira
Aug 14, 2008 (7:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: yatesjo (Aug 13, 2008 12:02 pm)

It's the car's own bio-feedback.
#217 of 248
2008 Sienna LE 2WD by samilcar
Aug 17, 2008 (1:06 pm)
Reply
My first six tanks:
 
1st tank - 375 miles, 22.7 MPG, 50% highway 50% city

2nd tank - 261 miles, 19.8 MPG, 30% highway 70% city
 
3rd tank - 357 miles, 19.8 MPG, 30% highway 70% city
 
4th tank - 472 miles, 32.1 MPG, All highway - 60-65 MPH average
 
5th tank - 501 miles, 27.9 MPG, All highway mountain driving - 55 MPH average
 
6th tank - 535 miles, 28.5 MPG, All highway - 70 MPH average
 
Total of six tanks - 2501 miles, 25.2 MPG
 
I am very pleased with these numbers. One of the main reasons I chose the Sienna was current Sienna owner reports of 30+MPG on the highway. The 32 MPG tank above was achieved with a fully loaded van (three people and 400 lbs of cargo).
#218 of 248
11 MPG for 2008 Sienna XLE AWD by trademarkguru
Aug 21, 2008 (8:08 pm)
Reply
I am new to this forum so please excuse me if there is a prior message on such horrible gas mileage. If you could point me towards the right post that may address this, that would be great.
 
We just purchased our Sienna a couple of weeks ago (it is a limited AWD), and were expecting a little hit from the AWD but not this. The on-board computer said like 12.5 mpg when we got the van at 120 miles (I thought it might just be the lead foot test drives), but it is at 700 miles now and reports 11.5 mpg average for that 700 miles, and we drive normally (3 kids in the back . I topped off for the last two fills and we got 11 mpg this last tank (65% city, 35% highway). I'll be taking her in for service, but any ideas? Acceleration and power seems very good, but we are very concerned when we fill up and the DTE says 215, and we now know that it is accurate. I thought there must be some "mistake" for the first full tank. If our odometer is a little off, that might explain things a bit, but not this much.
 
Thanks.

Messages Page 22 of 25
1
...
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement