Article Comments: 2007 Mercedes-Benz GL320 CDI 4MATIC First Drive

26 messages, Last post on Dec 12, 2007 at 10:28 PM

You are in the Mercedes-Benz GL Class Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mercedes-Benz GL-Class, SUV

Article comments for First Drive: 2007 Mercedes-Benz GL320 CDI 4MATIC - Walk around to the front, nearer the engine, and there's the barely detectable plunkety-ping of a diesel engine. It's not any louder than the noise made by many modern gasoline engines; it's just different. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 3: 1; 2; 3; Prev; Next; Last

#7 of 26 Re: CA and CDI GL 320 [mblover2] by ctccobra Sep 17, 2006 (4:06 pm)
Replying to: mblover2 (Aug 31, 2006 10:15 pm) That won't work. I believe the law considers any with less the 7500 miles a "new" vehicle and prohibits the owner from driving the extra miles for the purposes of making it "used". There are a few exceptions i.e. Military, wrecked car, inherited.
#8 of 26 Re: CA and CDI GL 320 [mblover2] by benzodiesel Sep 18, 2006 (7:17 am)
Replying to: mblover2 (Aug 31, 2006 10:15 pm) My understanding is that you would have to be a resident of the other state in order to do this (i.e., you couldn't be a CA resident who buys a "new" (less that 7500 miles) vehicle in another state and then brings to CA, regardless of how many miles on vehicle when you try to register it. But if you register it AS A RESIDENT of the other state, that shouldn't be a problem. Replies to this message: carpersn (Sep 28, 2006 10:52 am) gagrice (Oct 21, 2006 5:16 am)
#9 of 26 Re: CA and CDI GL 320 [benzodiesel] by carpersn Sep 28, 2006 (10:52 am)
Replying to: benzodiesel (Sep 18, 2006 7:17 am) I say screw Kalifornia, and all that messed up BS-you could alternatively go out and buy a Ford Powerstroke diesel "work" pickup which gets 14 mpg and spews black stuff-that's OK, apparently. Just not something that makes total and complete sense and actually furthers our independence on foreign oil suppliers while still delivering what we need in terms of space and comfort. If i had to live there, i would do whatever it took to make it work, including titling the car in a relative's name who lives elsewhere. Replies to this message: gagrice (Oct 21, 2006 5:16 am)
#10 of 26 Re: CA and CDI GL 320 [carpersn] by gagrice Oct 21, 2006 (5:16 am)
Replying to: carpersn (Sep 28, 2006 10:52 am) I'm with you. It is so archaic the way CA uses their goofy laws that make little sense. I am thinking about buying the GL320 CDI and keeping it at my place in MN till it reaches 7500 miles. Or maybe just using it on vacation in CA for a couple years. More than one way to skin a cat. I have a friend here in SD that has the E320 CDI. He also has a home in TX. It is registered in TX. Loves the car. Best Mercedes he has ever owned.
#11 of 26 WHEN? by wopel Oct 21, 2006 (6:05 am)
I emailed MB to find out when the GL 320 would be released. All I got was the first quarter of 2007 as a 2008 model. Anyone else know any more? I suppose they are pushing the ML and R and E first. Replies to this message: wopel (Oct 22, 2006 8:06 am) gagrice (Oct 22, 2006 6:41 pm)
#12 of 26 conundrum by wopel Oct 22, 2006 (8:06 am)
Replying to: wopel (Oct 21, 2006 6:05 am) As I drove by my fuel station last night I noticed the price of diesel at $2.49 and the price of High test at $2.35. So, do I buy a more fuel efficient diesel and pay more for fuel, or buy a less efficient vehicle and pay less. Does it come out in the wash? Also MB tends to add a premium to the diesels, so that's another equation. Replies to this message: gagrice (Oct 22, 2006 6:41 pm)
#13 of 26 Re: conundrum [wopel] by gagrice Oct 22, 2006 (6:41 pm)
Replying to: wopel (Oct 22, 2006 8:06 am) I think the premium on the E, R & ML CDI is about $1k. The diesel should get at least 33% better mileage. I'm not sure where you are. CA is notorious for high priced diesel Unleaded Premium and diesel are about the same right today. Using your price for diesel and Premium it would take you about 30k miles to pay off that premium. Experience tells me that the diesel will hold its value slightly better than the MB gasser. So if you sell in 3 years you could come out somewhat ahead with the CDI. Plus not adding near as much CO2 (GHG) to the environment.
#14 of 26 Mercedes diesels and 4th-generation 4Matic by ennnorak Oct 24, 2006 (5:59 pm)
I always wanted to own a Mercedes diesel with a silky smooth in-line 6 cylinder engine. Mercedes has disappointed me by using, instead, an inherently out-of-balance 90-degree V configuration these days. I live in a cold climate with winter storms so I need traction on all 4 wheels. I therefore drive a leased Audi A6 Quattro. I note that the 4th-generation 4Matic is now available on the S-Class but the Mercedes Canadian website states that the front differential "transmits power to the front left axle shaft by an intermediate shaft running through an encapsulated shaft channel in the engine oil sump". It is not clear whether the shaft runs through a tunnel (with air space) in the oil sump or if the shaft actually rotates through engine oil and is prevented from leaking engine oil by means of seals. Mercedes needs to provide a clear technical drawing on its website about this matter. Replies to this message: gagrice (Oct 25, 2006 6:37 pm)
#15 of 26 Re: Mercedes diesels and 4th-generation 4Matic [ennnorak] by gagrice Oct 25, 2006 (6:37 pm)
Replying to: ennnorak (Oct 24, 2006 5:59 pm) Sounds like a nightmare to work on. Why not the ML320 CDI? I would think it would be better in deep snow. The 2006 E320 CDI is still an inline 6. I agree I prefer the inline to the V.
#16 of 26 ML320CDI by ennnorak Oct 25, 2006 (7:20 pm)
I just checked Mercedes' Canadian website and confirmed that the 2007 ML320CDI's engine has a V-configuration. I recall that the last in-line 6 that Mercedes offered in North America was about a year ago in the E-Class (I should have bought one, especially since it had an iron block). I also recall that, a few years ago, Mercedes licensed the in-line 6 design to the Koreans (Daewoo I think) who intended to offer it in North America in a nice 2-door hardtop SUV called the Koranda or something like that. I don't know whatever happened to that project but the vehicle was something like what a larger, more opulent, and more modern Suzuki Samurai would have looked like today. I lost complete interest in the ML when Mercedes abandoned the separate frame and body design in favour of a cheaper unit body SUV. I sat in a 2007 S-Class for half an hour several weeks before the 4Matic version became available and then looked at both the ML and GL which were also in the showroom. After sitting in the S-Class I decided that both SUVs have seats that are much too firm. Replies to this message: gagrice (Oct 26, 2006 9:01 pm)