- #1 of 26
-
Article Comments: 2007 Mercedes-Benz GL320 CDI 4MATIC First Drive
by KarenS HOST
-
Jul 27, 2006 (8:32 am)
-
|
Go with us on first drive for the MB GL320 CDI 4MATIC ! Post your comments here.
First Drive: 2007 Mercedes-Benz GL320 CDI 4MATIC
|
- #2 of 26
-
Re: Article Comments: 2007 Mercedes-Benz GL320 CDI 4MATIC First Drive [KarenS]
by ednardes
-
Jul 27, 2006 (12:44 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: KarenS (Jul 27, 2006 8:32 am)
California fails once again, otherwise my neighborhood wouldnt be chockfull of H2s and Escalades. Very very nice mercedes, reminds me of the days my mother drooled over the grey market imported Diesel G-wagons.
|
- #3 of 26
-
Sweet !!
by mercara
-
Jul 27, 2006 (6:30 pm)
-
|
|
Sweet. Now only if Toyota would launch the rumored 4.4 V8 CDI engine or if mercedes would improve it's abysmal quality ratings, I could get to drive a diesel.
|
- #4 of 26
-
Re: Sweet !! [mercara]
by wopel
-
Jul 28, 2006 (5:54 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: mercara (Jul 27, 2006 6:30 pm)
You are absolutely right! I want to drive a diesel. I drove diesels for years and then MB quit sending the diesel wagon to the US. I drove a rabbit for many years as well. I don't like the new R too much, but the GL would be great - but only as a diesel. Toyota would shoot to the moon if they would sell a diesel in the US. I've read they have them in other parts of the world. Another thing - why wait til early '07 on the GL? The R and M are coming out in the fall.
|
- #5 of 26
-
CA and CDI GL 320
by mblover2
-
Aug 31, 2006 (10:15 pm)
-
|
|
I understand the CA emission law will not allow a new GL Diesel to be purchased or sold here. What if you purchased it in another state and then after it is 7000 mile old bring in to CA as a used vehicle? Is this allowed?
|
- #6 of 26
-
D-Day?
by carpersn
-
Sep 06, 2006 (6:38 pm)
-
|
|
So, anybody know any more about when this beast is due to arrive?
|
- #7 of 26
-
Re: CA and CDI GL 320 [mblover2]
by ctccobra
-
Sep 17, 2006 (4:06 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: mblover2 (Aug 31, 2006 10:15 pm)
That won't work. I believe the law considers any with less the 7500 miles a "new" vehicle and prohibits the owner from driving the extra miles for the purposes of making it "used". There are a few exceptions i.e. Military, wrecked car, inherited.
|
- #8 of 26
-
Re: CA and CDI GL 320 [mblover2]
by benzodiesel
-
Sep 18, 2006 (7:17 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: mblover2 (Aug 31, 2006 10:15 pm)
My understanding is that you would have to be a resident of the other state in order to do this (i.e., you couldn't be a CA resident who buys a "new" (less that 7500 miles) vehicle in another state and then brings to CA, regardless of how many miles on vehicle when you try to register it. But if you register it AS A RESIDENT of the other state, that shouldn't be a problem.
|
- #9 of 26
-
Re: CA and CDI GL 320 [benzodiesel]
by carpersn
-
Sep 28, 2006 (10:52 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: benzodiesel (Sep 18, 2006 7:17 am)
I say screw Kalifornia, and all that messed up BS-you could alternatively go out and buy a Ford Powerstroke diesel "work" pickup which gets 14 mpg and spews black stuff-that's OK, apparently. Just not something that makes total and complete sense and actually furthers our independence on foreign oil suppliers while still delivering what we need in terms of space and comfort.
If i had to live there, i would do whatever it took to make it work, including titling the car in a relative's name who lives elsewhere.
|
- #10 of 26
-
Re: CA and CDI GL 320 [carpersn]
by gagrice
-
Oct 21, 2006 (5:16 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: carpersn (Sep 28, 2006 10:52 am)
I'm with you. It is so archaic the way CA uses their goofy laws that make little sense. I am thinking about buying the GL320 CDI and keeping it at my place in MN till it reaches 7500 miles. Or maybe just using it on vacation in CA for a couple years. More than one way to skin a cat. I have a friend here in SD that has the E320 CDI. He also has a home in TX. It is registered in TX. Loves the car. Best Mercedes he has ever owned.
|