Sign In Join 



Acura TSX vs. Infiniti G35

194 messages,  Last post on Jul 24, 2009 at 7:54 AM

You are in the Acura TSX Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura TSX, Infiniti G35, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 18 of 20
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#168 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by sjaieve
Jun 24, 2009 (9:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 24, 2009 9:05 am)

Oh BTW, good choice on the M3, its a very nice car. However in my case, for 80k, I will go with the GTR. I guess that shows you how different we are, LOL. Dont take that to mean I do not like the M3, in fact you dont need me to tell you that, its quite simply the benchmark for performanc e luxury sedans under 100k. In my case though, the GTR tickles my fancy more.
#169 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [sjaieve] by gooddeal2
Jun 24, 2009 (10:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: sjaieve (Jun 24, 2009 9:15 am)

...unless "brand" is important to you.
 
Yes, that's all for some people. There're so many people out there who try to justify that when they spend more money, they get better products. I like to buy CK and Lacoste cloths b/c I like them. If you ask me "is the quality better than those cheaper brands?", I don't think. However, some people would think that because they spend $80 for a Lacoste shirt, they get a superior quality product.
 
Those are the people who say "BMW is the best!, or "Honda is the best!, or "Toyota is the best!", "Nissan is the best!", or "MB is the best!".
#170 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by cdnpinhead
Jun 24, 2009 (11:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 24, 2009 9:05 am)

Thanks for holding up our side, or trying to.
 
I'm enjoying my '08 manual TSX, but not as much as the 3-series estate I would have preferred -- if it didn't have RFTs and came with a 2 or 2.5 litre diesel. Oh, and then there's that failure-prone oil level sensor and no dip stick, oh, and that . . .
 
So, the TSX is a definite compromise for me, but the G would have been also. Truck engine, lousy fuel mileage & no fold-down rear seats, but that's just me.
 
Another backstory is the TSX diesel that was supposed to have been introduced here by now, but apparently won't be. I figured I could trade in my gasser on the diesel & do okay. Oh, but wait, no diesel for you (think soup Nazi).
 
I could end up driving this appliance for quite some time & it's generally okay. I'd really like RWD, but I've got a solid manual transmission, decent handling & pretty damn good fuel mileage, plus which the thing will last for the next 200K miles.
 
If Audi brings a diesel A3 or A4 with a manual, or if BMW wakes up and brings the 2 or 2.5 diesels (with manual) over here (as opposed to the giant-killer 3.35D, only available with an automatic), or if I decide I can live with VW reliability, I may trade in my TSX, but for now I'm okay.
#171 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [sjaieve] by fedlawman
Jun 24, 2009 (12:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sjaieve (Jun 24, 2009 9:52 am)

"Oh BTW, good choice on the M3, its a very nice car. However in my case, for 80k, I will go with the GTR."
 
Actually, I'm not a fan of the new M3 (or any current BMW's). It's too big and heavy for me. No, my M3 is a 22 year-old original E30. It's got a 2.5L 4-cylinder engine and weighs 2700 lbs.
 
Actually, your GTR is another perfect example of why you and I have completely different feelings about cars. When I drive a car, I appreciate subtle tactile steering response, a light, crisp shift action, perfectly modulated throttle response, an engine that sings and asks for more as it winds up to 8000 RPM, and a chassis that dances through corners. I want to be rewarded for driving a car with skill and precision. The GTR is more like a video game than a sports car - just push the go pedal and turn the steering wheel and it does the rest. You can have it.
 
It matters less to me how fast I'm going than the way the car interacts with and responds to me. Remember, we're talking about cars that are primarily used to commute in urban traffic and maybe take a cruise down the freeway on the weekend. If we are talking about going to the track on weekends and driving at 10/10ths, then yes, G37 is the better choice (though, still a poor choice compared to better cars out there). But for relaxing in traffic during your weekday commute or clearing your head with a brisk (but not aggressive) 7/10ths drive through the mountains, I think the TSX is the more pleasant car to drive. More precise steering, better clutch/shifter, airy and bright cabin, soft touch controls, and lighter on it's feet. It just feels right.
 
The Altima, Accord, Camry, etc. could perhaps be compared with the automatic transmission TSX, but none of them can match the TSX's combination of trim dimensions, chassis dynamics, and quality fit/finish. If you can't tell the difference, then you have never driven a 6MT TSX.
 
I do agree with you about the direction Acura is going. The previous generation TSX and TL were better, more focused cars than the current crop.
#172 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by fedlawman
Jun 24, 2009 (12:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 24, 2009 12:06 pm)

Come to think of it...
 
I think the best car in this class would offer the sportiness of the G37 with the polish/refinement of the Acura TSX. Basically, the BMW 335i.
#173 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [gooddeal2] by sjaieve
Jun 24, 2009 (1:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gooddeal2 (Jun 24, 2009 10:43 am)

Well, if clothes are made in Italy, hand sawn over there, then yes I can pay a premium for that. But if its made in China and they attach a brand label on it, no I will not pay a premium. The reason being in China, the clothes are made using cheap labor, therefore I will not pay as much as for a brand coming from Italy, where the labor costs are more expensive. With cars, LOL, I buy the object, not the brand. I agree Mercedes is great, the S Class, CL come to mind (few can compete well with these cars), but when it comes to the C Class, there are so many competitors out there it can hardly stand out. So buying a C Class cos its a Mercedes, may not necessarily be the best way to approach this. Yes its a Mercedes but more importantly its a C Class. But each to his own, as long as you are happy.
#174 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by sjaieve
Jun 24, 2009 (1:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 24, 2009 12:06 pm)

Actually, I'm not a fan of the new M3 (or any current BMW's). It's too big and heavy for me. No, my M3 is a 22 year-old original E30. It's got a 2.5L 4-cylinder engine and weighs 2700 lbs.
 
A lot of good things have been said of this model of the M3. Look man, I dont own a GTR and so will not get into any discussion on how it feels etc although I disagree a lot with what you said about it. I will leave it at that.
 
If we are talking about going to the track on weekends and driving at 10/10ths, then yes, G37 is the better choice (though, still a poor choice compared to better cars out there). But for relaxing in traffic during your weekday commute or clearing your head with a brisk (but not aggressive) 7/10ths drive through the mountains, I think the TSX is the more pleasant car to drive.
 
I am not sure if you are saying this becuase you dislike me or the car, LOL. Listen, I used to own an IS250 before I got rid of it. I will tell you this, the G drives better in every day traffic than the IS250. It just feels so much better, less tire noise and more comfortable as it absorbs bumps better. In fact these days I have just been rolling down the windows driving at 50mph listening to music and just watching guys pass by. Sooooooo relaxing.
 
Just to be fair, here are my issues with the G:
No DRL
Doors do not lock when you start driving, this has been corrected for 09 models though.
Fuel mileage 20mpg, its bad but cant complain, I knew what I was getting into. I do use all of my horses quite frequently though. Or put differently, its tough to hide all those horses.
The IS250 had better materials than the G, but, compared to say Camry, Accord, Altima, the materials are better, which is the minimum I require to call this a luxury car.
 
Good luck with the Altima, Camry, Maxima forums, if I were you I would not even start a thread of that nature as I think it will be tough convincing those guys the TSX is the wiser choice.
#175 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by sjaieve
Jun 24, 2009 (1:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 24, 2009 12:22 pm)

think the best car in this class would offer the sportiness of the G37 with the polish/refinement of the Acura TSX. Basically, the BMW 335i.
 
I have to disagree. In terms of sportiness, the 335i rules. So you cant say a 335i with the sportiness of the G37, please apologize to the 335i owners:)
 
As far as Acura refinement/polishness goes, you are probably the 1st person I have heard say this, but each to his own, its what makes you happy at the end of the day right.
#176 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [sjaieve] by fedlawman
Jun 24, 2009 (3:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sjaieve (Jun 24, 2009 1:28 pm)

"As far as Acura refinement/polishness goes, you are probably the 1st person I have heard say this."
 
Really!?!? It's obvious that you've never driven a TSX, and now I'm sure you've never even read a magazine review either. Car & Driver Magazine eloquently summed up the TSX back in 2004. Here's a sample:
 
"Take Acura's new sports sedan, the TSX. It's a car that distances itself from its rivals not by performance numbers, but rather by how it performs. The TSX goes about its business so smoothly and so silkily that precision could be its middle name."
 
"Sit behind the TSX's leather-wrapped, three-spoke steering wheel, and it appears as if all the money went into the materials and the fluidity of the parts. The sumptuous leather, the tasteful metallic accents, the LED gauges, and the top-grade plastics are befitting a car costing twice as much...All the materials scream luxury, and all the parts whisper smooth. Every knob, switch, and moving part seems to be glazed with Teflon."
 
"Our advice is this: If you're in the market for a less-than-$30-grand sports sedan, check out the TSX. It's not the quickest to 60, or the fastest around the skidpad, or the shortest stopper, but it's the purest form of precision in its class."
 
And C&D's first drive of the 2009 TSX...
 
"From our brief first drive along the mountain roads northeast of San Diego, we can say that the new car still has that light-on-its-feet feeling that has characterized the TSX all along. Power from the rev-happy 201-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder is sufficient if not overabundant. The delightfully precise, stubby six-cog manual shifter is exactly the same bit found in the 2008 model and delivers, not surprisingly, the same level of satisfaction."
 
"As before, the TSX’s steering is crisp, quick, and happily unaffected by the 172 pound-feet of torque being sent to the front axle. The suspension is taut, yielding sweet and flat cornering about as close to that of, say, the Volkswagen GTI, as possible without allowing impact harshness to turn off premium brand customers"
 
"We have always been fond of the TSX’s balance of power, comfort, and fun, so we were thrilled (and relieved) that, for once, such a balance has been retained in spite of Honda’s thorough reworking of pretty much everything around that honey of an engine."
 
Obviously, it's not your kind of car, and that's OK - The G is a fantastic car, no doubt. But I challenge you to find one review of the G37 that uses so many words like "jewel," "refined," "delightful," "smoothly and silkily," "sumptuous," or "tasteful" to describe the G37. These words should give you some idea of why the TSX appeals to so many people - in spite of it's obvious performance shortcomings. These subjective characteristics may not be important to you personally, but they are important qualities in the ELLPS class. And these qualities happen to be where the TSX shines over the G37.
#177 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by ocg35man
Jun 24, 2009 (4:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 24, 2009 3:33 pm)

Is Acura arrogant or stupid?
 
Why is it that all other brands are using 6,7 or 8 Speed Auto transmission, but
Acura is still using 5 Speed Auto?
 
Is it a cash problem or just being ignorant and not understand what's going on?
 
Why is Acura insisting using Major Ugly Design-especially front face that only
mother would love?
 
When you spend Millions of dollar developing new cars, don't they ask for
some input and opinion Before in production?
 
BMW-nice performance cars, which I'd only consider leasing during warranty
period, Unless you have a good friend or relative who can work on it when it
starts to breakdown after warranty is over.

Messages Page 18 of 20
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement