Sign In Join 



Acura TSX vs. Infiniti G35

194 messages,  Last post on Jul 24, 2009 at 7:54 AM

You are in the Acura TSX Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura TSX, Infiniti G35, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 17 of 20
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#158 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by sjaieve
Jun 23, 2009 (1:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 22, 2009 7:33 pm)

You're right about the excellent qualities of the G and the niche it fills very well between sport and luxury. Truth be told, I've been playing a little Devil's advocate here simply because I don't understand all narrow-minded opinions of the juvenile 0-60 fanboys that worship it. It's really a very poor choice for someone who's looking for a "fast car." It's quick, but it's not fast.
 
Glad you came out of the closet on this one, LOL. You seem to be getting your tongue twisted though, on one hand you say the G is a jack of all trades and in the same breath you state some buy the G cos of the 0-60 times only, which is it? and "You're right about the excellent qualities of the G and the niche it fills very well between sport and luxury" that is exactly why we chose it, the 0-60 times is just a bonus:)
 
Oh and on a different note, I used to take the 328i for granted but when you realize that with only 230HP, the car will take on the TSX V6, Cadillac CTS, C350, TL with 305HP, I realized why CD makes a big deal of this car. I have to take my hat off to the engineering that went behind the smooth inline 6 in that car. But for the same price, I am very happy with the "jack of all trades".
#159 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by drwilsc
Jun 23, 2009 (2:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 22, 2009 7:33 pm)

Wow, that 04 TSX's dash IS nice. I for one also prefer the 04-07 Accord, especially the dash, to the current generation.
 
I, too, am playing devil's advocate. One reason for my original post (#130) was I was looking for someone to tell me why I should get a TSX V6. (another reason was simply to 'wake up' the forum, since it may make for interesting discussion). My lease on my 08 G35 is over in Sept. 2011. That may be bad timing with regard to catching the G at the tail end of its generation cycle, so I would like to be thinking about other choices. I actually think the TSX V6 is a very interesting car.
 
The point about the G's engine being less than refined at high revs is so true, unfortunately. I noticed it immediately the first time I test drove it. It sounded more course than the engine in my previous car, a 2007 Saturn Aura XR. (hey, don't laugh, the General's 3.6 L engine is actually smoother than you might think).
#160 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [ingvar] by fedlawman
Jun 23, 2009 (4:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ingvar (Jun 23, 2009 4:14 am)

"Have you had a chance to drive "terrific car?" What's about torque steer and FWD? Why 5 speed auto?"
 
Yes, I have. I owned a 2004 TSX 6MT.
 
I have also driven a 2009 TSX 6MT and liked it, though not as much as the old one.
 
FWD is a downside, no doubt about it, but for 90% of drivers buying in this segment, I don't think it matters much (I don't think most drivers can tell the difference). Besides, all new cars, whether Acura, Audi, BMW, or Porsche, are set up to push at the limit. To dial understeer out of any new car, you must spend money in the aftermarket.
 
As for torque steer, a well engineered FWD car - especially one with only 200hp, will not have a problem with it. Nobody who has driven the V6 TSX has mentioned torque steer, so I'll assume for now it's a non-issue.
 
5 speed. 7-speed, DSC, LMNOP - if it has a slushbox, it's just another Buick as far as I'm concerned.
#161 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [sjaieve] by fedlawman
Jun 23, 2009 (4:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sjaieve (Jun 23, 2009 1:20 pm)

"on one hand you say the G is a jack of all trades and in the same breath you state some buy the G cos of the 0-60 times only, which is it?"
 
It seems to me that an inordinate number of G owners think their car is the shiznit. I can't begin to count the number of G's that have pulled up next to me at a light and wanted to race me. It's a Jack-of-all-trades in that it does many things well (accelerate, corner, ride, features, etc.), but it isn't the best at anything. In it's class, it's not the fastest, it's not the best handling, it's not the most luxurious or refined, and it's not the prettiest.
 
"I used to take the 328i for granted but when you realize that with only 230HP, the car will take on the TSX V6, Cadillac CTS, C350, TL with 305HP."
 
You are overlooking the real reasons why the 328i can keep up with those other, more powerful cars. It's not the I-6 (which I agree is a fine motor). It's weight (sprung and unsprung), gearing, driveline loss, and torque converters all conspiring to rob these cars of acceleration (and handling). The 305 HP Acura TL-S isn't as quick as the G37 because it has a slushbox and weighs 300 lbs. more. The TSX V6 isn't quicker because of the slushbox and FWD drivetrain (weight transfer at launch lifts the front wheels and limits traction).
 
Again, you should be happy with your G, it's a nice car - if you prefer crude drivetrains, cheap materials, numb steering, and vague clutch/throttle response...
#162 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [drwilsc] by fedlawman
Jun 23, 2009 (4:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: drwilsc (Jun 23, 2009 2:55 pm)

"I, too, am playing devil's advocate."
 
 
 
"One reason for my original post (#130) was I was looking for someone to tell me why I should get a TSX V6."
 
I won't be the one to tell you that. If Buick were to build a small, sporty sedan, it would be the V6 TSX.
 
"my previous car, a 2007 Saturn Aura XR. (hey, don't laugh...)"
 
I'm not laughing. I think the Aura is actually a pretty nice car (and a good effort from GM). The 3.6L is an outstanding motor, and I like the brown leather interior and cockpit design/layout (nicer than the G ).
#163 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by drwilsc
Jun 23, 2009 (5:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 23, 2009 4:48 pm)

With regard to the Aura, I miss the remote start (not available on the G) and the smoother, if less powerful, engine. The dash is nice as well. The backseat and trunk were larger than the Infiniti's.
 
One big advantage for the G, however, is the AWD (mine is a G35X). It virtually eliminates unwanted wheelspin, especially in the rain, and handles better in the snow. I never thought I would care about AWD until I drove this. The 252 hp FWD Saturn often chirped its tires even when I was not trying to drive aggresively. I suppose that may be a potential downside to the TSX - no AWD.
#164 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by sjaieve
Jun 24, 2009 (8:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 23, 2009 4:38 pm)

It seems to me that an inordinate number of G owners think their car is the shiznit. I can't begin to count the number of G's that have pulled up next to me at a light and wanted to race me. It's a Jack-of-all-trades in that it does many things well (accelerate, corner, ride, features, etc.),
 
What do you drive, if its a TSX I hardly believe any G is going to try to race you, its a pure waste of the G drivers time.
 
Again, you should be happy with your G, it's a nice car - if you prefer crude drivetrains, cheap materials, numb steering, and vague clutch/throttle response... Thanks for your opinion on this, its always good to know what others think, keeps me in check.
 
You are overlooking the real reasons why the 328i can keep up with those other, more powerful cars. It's not the I-6 (which I agree is a fine motor). It's weight (sprung and unsprung), gearing, driveline loss, and torque converters all conspiring to rob these cars of acceleration (and handling). The 305 HP Acura TL-S isn't as quick as the G37 because it has a slushbox and weighs 300 lbs. more. The TSX V6 isn't quicker because of the slushbox and FWD drivetrain (weight transfer at launch lifts the front wheels and limits traction).
 
And that is exactly why the Acura needs to go back to the drawing board.
#165 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [sjaieve] by fedlawman
Jun 24, 2009 (9:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: sjaieve (Jun 24, 2009 8:52 am)

"What do you drive"
 
A BMW M3.
 
"Acura needs to go back to the drawing board."
 
And this summarizes why you just don't get it. The TSX is exactly what it's supposed to be. It's not trying to be a G37 or 3-series. Like clothing, people buying cars in this segment have many different priorities for choosing Brand A over Brand B. Some place a high value on acceleration and handling while others look for a certain style, refinement, aesthetics.
 
If you think of the G37 as a "poor man's BMW 3-series," then perhaps it would help to think of the TSX as a "rich man's VW Jetta."
 
Different target audience, different strengths and weaknesses, different philosophy, but no less compelling a car than the G37.
#166 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [drwilsc] by sjaieve
Jun 24, 2009 (9:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: drwilsc (Jun 23, 2009 2:55 pm)

My lease on my 08 is up next year and I will step into the G37. However its not going to be major change, I could have tried to find something else but due to my love for "numb steering, inferior materials, coarse drivetrain" I just cannot find anything right now that tickles my fancy. S4 would have done it if it started at 5k less than where its projected to start. I will just have to suck it up when the new G37s comes out. There is rumors that the G37 will be getting a DI engine most likely for the 2011MY or 2012MY, if its 2011 you will be right in line to get that.
 
If you want another car can I suggest:
 
Altima, Genesis, Maxima, Camry, they all are FWD cars and I dont think there is anything the TSX offers not available in these cars, unless "brand" is important to you. I was in a Maxima the other day and was impressed by what it has to offer, the interior looks great, comes with a super large moonroof, interior room is abundant, lots of tech (you have the same in the G though), 290HP and most likely if the G gets DI taking it to 350HP, the Maxima in the 2011/2012 MY may get the VQ engines currently available in the G37. This will be at the same time you are changing cars.
 
I can assure you are going to get more information once the threads start that compare these cars (Camry, Altima, Genesis, Accord etc) to the TSX, the other drivers are going to have a lot to say and it will be fun, if I have time I will check them out just for the fun of it.
#167 of 194
Re: Acura vs. Infiniti [fedlawman] by sjaieve
Jun 24, 2009 (9:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 24, 2009 9:05 am)

A BMW M3.
 
Makes sense, I would not try as I would get slaughtered, its not worth both my time or your time.
 
And this summarizes why you just don't get it. The TSX is exactly what it's supposed to be. It's not trying to be a G37 or 3-series. Like clothing, people buying cars in this segment have many different priorities for choosing Brand A over Brand B. Some place a high value on acceleration and handling while others look for a certain style, refinement, aesthetics.
 
Well I do, I think getting a TSX for a premium over Altimas, Camrys or Honda Accord may be considered by some as not worth it unless you are buying into the brand. I do not think I am the only one who will tell you that Acura messed up the current line up. They really do need to regroup. Look at the previous TL, did they really need to kill it like they did in the current MY. All they had to do was make a good thing better, and they did the opposite. See the MT comments on the TSX, lots of people are in the same boat as me.
 
If you think of the G37 as a "poor man's BMW 3-series," then perhaps it would help to think of the TSX as a "rich man's VW Jetta."
 
LOL, take it easy champ. The G can be priced right up to 45k, same as the 328i. The base price of the 335i is 40k. I dont think we are still living in the age where the 3 series is for rich people, these are not "rich people" prices we are talking about. If that were the case, what would we say of the Ferraris of this world. These are all entry level luxury cars so to say a G is a poor mans 3 series is really .........
 
Here is the thing, you try to compare a TSX to a G, take any segment, reliability, handling, tech, etc, it will get slaughtered, it will most likely get slaughtered with the Maxima, Camry and Accord as well. My point still stands, the TSX should not be compared to the G, maybe Camry as its way out if its league here. Like it or not thats just the way it is.
 
Put differently, the G is way out of its league with the M3, even the previous gen M3 and you will never see me try to compare these cars.

Messages Page 17 of 20
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement