Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Acura TSX Acura TSX vs. Infiniti G35
194 messages, Last post on Jul 24, 2009 at 7:54 AM
You are in the Acura TSX Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: gooddeal2 (Jun 22, 2009 9:36 am) I still think the 4 cyl TSX with 6-speed MT is the better car (and it's only $29,000). |
|
|
Replying to: sjaieve (Nov 18, 2008 8:02 pm) Resignation accepted. 
|
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 22, 2009 11:19 am) And just to add to the accolades of the Infiniti G series, JD Powers just released this today, highest ranked initial quality survey. Its an honor to stand next to a Lexus when it comes to quality cos those guys are merciless in that dept. The TSX is so out of its league with the G its not even funny. Believe me, I will be having fun with this thread.  Entry premium car: -Highest ranked: Lexus IS -Runners-up: Cadillac CTS, Infiniti G-Series |
|
|
Replying to: sjaieve (Jun 22, 2009 11:53 am) The question is - why is it so hard to understand that the TSX is also a terrific car? |
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 22, 2009 11:58 am) Yes the TSX is a great car, and yes the G is not the greatest car in the segment at least from a performance perspective, but once you factor everything in, even here at Edmunds they placed it 1st over the 335i, IS350, CTS, C350. Try pitting a TSX against these cars, see what happens.
|
|
|
Replying to: sjaieve (Jun 22, 2009 1:26 pm) The CTS in that article was down-graded because of its relatively slow performance (0-60 in mid 6's), which, incidently, is around the same performance as the TSX V6. |
|
|
Replying to: sjaieve (Jun 22, 2009 1:26 pm) From a personal perspective, I have driven both the G35 and G37 sedan and here are some of my thoughts: 1. The G35/37 has a powerful drivetrain - no doubt about it. But to my surprise, the G doesn't pull like a freight train like I expected. Torque still feels a little soft at lower RPM's. The BMW twin turbo is far superior in power delivery. The G does a nice job of hiding it's size and weight (it's a big, heavy car), but it definitely isn't as nimble as the smaller TSX. 2. Clutch take-up was too high and sudden which made moving from a stand-still unnecessarily difficult (especially on uphill inclines). Combine the poor clutch with an overly sensitive throttle tip-in (thanks to drive-by-wire), and the G was even difficult to upshift during normal driving. Pedal placement was also not the best for heel-and-toe downshifting, which is moot in the G because the aforementioned clutch/throttle issues made me loath to try it more than a couple of times. I did like the shifter action - short and precise throws with just the right heft. It was more precise and better feeling than the BMW 3-series, but not as slick as the TSX. 3. Interior ergonomics. Sorry, I hate the G37 cockpit. This one is much better than the 1st gen G35, but Infiniti is still behind Lexus, Audi, and Acura in designing a cockpit that's intimate, attractive, and functional. I know this is a personal call and everyone has a different opinion here, but to me, the layout and appearance of that recessed center display area is less organic and distracting - it ruins the otherwise smooth lines of the dashboard. The Infiniti's switchgear is also somewhat lacking in quality feel and precision of action as compared to other cars in this class. This is an area where Honda/Acura shines. Overall, the TSX cabin is light and airy, everything falls perfectly into place, and all the controls have a feel of quality and precision. 4. Exterior looks. I like the looks of the G37 from some angles, but I think it's a little on the boring. I'm afraid it will look dated very quickly like the 1st generation G35 does. 5. Chassis / driveline refinement is another area where the G37 has improved significantly since the first generation G35, but I think they tipped the pendulum a little too far the other way. Where the old car was noisy and harsh, but had razor sharp reflexes, the new car is a little soft and numb. It does have a good ride now however. BMW also went too soft and heavy with the current generation 3 series - as did Acura. I can only imagine what a soft, understeering pig the TSX will be with a big V6 over the front axle. The old 4cylinder TSX was very light on it's humble little feet with quick turn-in and great chassis response - I really liked the 1st generation TSX. Anyway, there you have it - my personal, completely biased opinion of these cars. Personally, I wouldn't choose either one. The G37 isn't fast enough to be thrilling, and it isn't luxurious enough to be coddling - kind of a Jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none if you ask me. For around $35,000, I'd rather own a Genesis on the luxury side or an Evo X on the sport side.
|
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 22, 2009 4:30 pm) I agree that the G looks a little plain, but is that really bad? It's hard to read any article, forum, etc. about the TL without many, many complaints about the ugly front end. The TSX's front end has a similar, if toned-down, appearance. Like the dash appearances this is subjective, maybe Acura's styling works for you. I sure have read a lot of complaints about it though and perhaps the plain styling of the Infiniti is not all that bad. The Acura's styling actually is starting to grow on me a little, but I still hesitate to spend 35 grand on a car and have family and friends tell me it's ugly. The G's throttle does take some getting used to, but after 2 or 3 weeks it was no longer a major issue. I think you hit the nail on the head about it being a jack of all trades and master of none, but again this may be looked at as a good thing. Sure the Evo will outperform it, ever sat in one? It has about as much luxury as a Chevy Chevette. The Genesis is a nice car for sure, but the G will out-accelerate it (even the V8 version by a small margin) and out-corner it. The G is a car that will run neck-and-neck with a Mustang GT and offer a fair amount of luxury for mid-30's in price. There just aren't too many other cars out there that can say that.
|
|
|
Replying to: drwilsc (Jun 22, 2009 5:38 pm) The old car was simple and elegant, while the new one is needlessly fussy and overstyled (yes, especially the beak). Here is the 2004 TSX which I still consider a benchmark for the class in interior ergonomics, comfort, design, and quality ...  You're right about the excellent qualities of the G and the niche it fills very well between sport and luxury. Truth be told, I've been playing a little Devil's advocate here simply because I don't understand all narrow-minded opinions of the juvenile 0-60 fanboys that worship it. It's really a very poor choice for someone who's looking for a "fast car." It's quick, but it's not fast.
|
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 22, 2009 11:58 am) Have you had a chance to drive "terrific car?" What's about torque steer and FWD? Why 5 speed auto?
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Acura TSX Acura TSX vs. Infiniti G35
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Acura TSX
2008 Infiniti G35
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
