Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Mainstream Large Sedans Comparison
6844 messages, Last post on Mar 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Nov 17, 2008 10:40 am) Any numbers on the interior volume? I'm curious, since it has grown so much. I know the Accord (non-moonroof) is 106 cu. ft. and with its 14 cu. ft. trunk, equals the 120 cu. ft. that it takes to get into the "Full Size" car territory. I was just curious how close the 6 comes to this. I can't find numbers on the Maxima either. Thanks, TheGrad |
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 17, 2008 10:45 am) Passenger Volume 96 ft3 (4D) 09 Maxima 102 ft3 (4D) 09 Mazda 6 Luggage Volume 14 ft3 (4D) 09 Maxima 17 ft3 (4D) 09 Mazda 6
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 17, 2008 10:45 am) Front Headroom (in.) 38.50 39.40 Rear Headroom (in.) 36.40 37.30 Front Legroom (in.) 43.80 42.50 Rear Legroom (in.) 34.60 38.00 Front Shoulder Room (in.) 56.30 57.30 Rear Shoulder Room (in.) 55.10 56.50 Front Hip Room (in.) 53.40 55.10 Rear Hip Room (in.) 53.90 55.90 After spending a lot of time in both the Mazda6, and their current 2004 Maxima, the Mazda6 feels smaller.The Mazda6 has a driver focused cockpit and every control can be reached with relative ease. I'm wondering how the 09 Max is in comparison.
|
|
|
Replying to: tenpin288 (Nov 17, 2008 10:54 am) |
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 17, 2008 10:14 am) Not necessarily. And not unless you really rev it up.The only way you will get the Maximas greater maximum horsepower is to wind it up to much higher than necessary revs. Sure, the Nissan may have a sight edge in a drag race, but most people do not rev their motors to their maximum revs in normal everyday driving. In normal everyday daily driving, extra torque is the better way to go. I will take a modern 3.7L with more torque to a warmed over higher HP 3.5L engine anytime. Torque is what pulls you along in normal everyday driving, when doing normal driving, grade climbing, leaving normally from a dead stop, etc. Many do not like the CVT and prefer feeling the gear changes, and from what I have read, Mazdas six speeds do get the job done. I drove that CVT tranny for two days in a rental and it does take some getting used to.
|
|
|
Replying to: donna388 (Nov 17, 2008 11:11 am) The 3.5 in the Max (VQ) is one of the best V6s ever.... the 3.7 in the Mazda has a long way to go to even be in the same league IMO. |
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Nov 17, 2008 11:02 am) One of the reviews I read on the '09 Max is Nissan still has some torque steer problems. Automobile mag actually just did a comparo on the Max vs 6 vs Passat cc. I didn't get a chance to read it, though
|
|
|
Replying to: donna388 (Nov 17, 2008 11:11 am) |
|
|
Replying to: tjc78 (Nov 17, 2008 11:28 am) |
|
|
Replying to: tjc78 (Nov 17, 2008 11:28 am) Of course, this is also an admission that the other two cost more. If I worked for Mazda, I would be inclined to like its products, so it's hard for me to be too critical. However, it does sound to me as if that's a factor here. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Mainstream Large Sedans Comparison
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Buick Lucerne
2010 Chevrolet Impala
2011 Dodge Charger
2010 Ford Taurus
2010 Hyundai Azera
2010 Toyota Avalon
2010 Nissan Maxima
2009 Pontiac G8
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
