Sign In Join 



Mainstream Large Sedans Comparison

6844 messages,  Last post on Mar 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Buick Lucerne, Chevrolet Impala, Dodge Charger, Ford Taurus, Hyundai Azera, Toyota Avalon, Nissan Maxima, Pontiac G8, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 640 of 685
1
...
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
...
685
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6391 of 6844
Re: Taurus observations? [brucelinc] by snaglepus
Jun 03, 2008 (12:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brucelinc (Jun 03, 2008 5:07 am)

"Going down into a pretty stiff headwind, we got 29.6 MPG. Coming home, we got 31.4. This was 90% Interstate cruising at 75 - 80 MPH. We have taken a number of shorter
trips on two-lane roads at lower speeds and gotten 33-34 MPG. On her daily commute
of 50/50 city and freeway, grocery shopping, etc. it averages around 24-25 MPG.
The tall overdrive in 6th gear really helps fuel economy on the highway. The
engine is powerful enough to prevent unwanted downshifts on hills, too"

 
"The Taurus has a 3.16 axle ratio and a .74 OD for a final drive
of 2.34. At 75 MPH, it is turning around 2000 RPM"

 
Using your figures which BTW I am unable to verify for a 2008 Taurus, we find
that with the standard tire, a Continental ContiTouringContact
CT95, size 215/60TR17 turns 767 revs per mile.
 
3.16 X 0.74 X 767 equals 1794 revs per mile at 60 mph. Indeed, rather 'tall' gearing.
 
1794 divided by 60 equals 29.89 revs per one mph.
 
Taking that further, we find that:
 
75 mph will be 2241 RPM
 
80 mph will be 2391 RPM
 
I do not see how this vehicle turning those revs will achieve those high
average miles-per-gallon figures stated at those speeds.
#6392 of 6844
Re: Taurus vs Azera observations [jaymagic] by captain2
Jun 03, 2008 (12:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jaymagic (Jun 03, 2008 12:22 pm)

the miles to empty does not readjust up, the display simply stays where it is
Avalon is the same, but my wife's 5 year old Altima OTH does 'adjust up'. One other thing that I'd like to see changed on the Avalon, the 'average MPG' resets itself every time you fill up and sometimes will even reset itself when it 'thinks' it's getting filled up - gas sloshing around in the tank or parking on a slope. Makes it impossible to keep track of FE on a long multiple fill-up trip - unless you do it manually. Have found the computer FE to generally be closer than the calculated method, especially if I'm not the one 'breaking the rules' and filling the gas up the filler neck.
#6393 of 6844
Re: Taurus vs Azera observations [captain2] by louiswei
Jun 03, 2008 (12:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Jun 03, 2008 12:36 pm)

why - if it (the FSE) is supposedly more efficient are the FE ratings lower for the IS than it is for the Avalon
 
Different tuning and almost 40 extra hp (268 vs 306). The FSE is tuned for performance driving and FE is tuned for smoothness and efficiency.
 
why wouldn't Toyota put the DI in the Avalon and increase the FE advantage it already has in this class?
 
Cost my captain, cost!!
 
'double-Vanos'
 
I think double VANOS is about the intake valves like Honda's i-VTEC and Toyota's i VVT. I was talking about the fuel injecting technology, those two are totally different animals. Actually the DI technology is nothing new, it has been used on diesel engines since like forever, it has been used on gasoline engines earlier too but only becomes popular recently. However, so far I don't know what other engine(s) uses the duel injection technology like Toyota did with the 2GR-FSE.
#6394 of 6844
Re: Taurus observations? [snaglepus] by captain2
Jun 03, 2008 (12:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: snaglepus (Jun 03, 2008 12:38 pm)

75 mph will be 2241 RPM
  
80 mph will be 2391 RPM

 
now we are getting a bit more technical aren't we? These numbers BTW almost identical to what I see in my Avalon BTW and what I would guess is very typical for these drivetrains.Had a hard time with 80mph at 2000 rpm!
#6395 of 6844
Re: Taurus vs Azera observations [louiswei] by captain2
Jun 03, 2008 (1:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: louiswei (Jun 03, 2008 12:47 pm)

Cost my captain, cost!!
I'm sure it is not free - however I'm sure you've probably read the articles about the development of the 2GR and also know that Toyota is saving literally billions of dollars making a far better engine then before. If I remember right something to the tune of a grand saved PER ENGINE - you wouldn't think a set of Nippondenso injectors would even approach that?
#6396 of 6844
Re: Taurus vs Azera observations [captain2] by louiswei
Jun 03, 2008 (1:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Jun 03, 2008 1:06 pm)

you wouldn't think a set of Nippondenso injectors would even approach that?
 
The primary disadvantages of direct injection engines are complexity and cost. Direct injection systems are more expensive to build because their components must be more rugged -- they handle fuel at significantly higher pressures than indirect injection systems and the injectors themselves must be able to withstand the heat and pressure of combustion inside the cylinder.
 
Source: Direct Fuel Injection
 
Looks like it's not just a set of Nippondenso injectors...
 
 
#6397 of 6844
Re: Taurus vs Azera observations [carolinabob] by captain2
Jun 03, 2008 (1:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carolinabob (Jun 03, 2008 4:46 am)

Not to mention the extra 750 for Southeastern Toyota and the 700 "ToyoGuard" fabric and exterior protection
 
if it makes you feel any better - Gulf States down here in Texas does the same thing (GST and SET are the only 2 independent Toyota distributors left apparently) - and it STILL is almost impossible to find an Avalon down here without that kinda extra markup in it and that's after the car has been available for more than 3 years. A testament to how well the car sells perhaps but a definite disadvantage when dealing with those that are so conscious of initial prices.
#6398 of 6844
Re: Taurus vs Azera observations [captain2] by dborth
Jun 03, 2008 (1:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Jun 03, 2008 12:36 pm)

"speaks volumes about the techinical superiority of the 2GR".
 
Perhaps you should create a 2GR Forum.
#6399 of 6844
Re: Taurus vs Azera observations [louiswei] by captain2
Jun 03, 2008 (1:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: louiswei (Jun 03, 2008 1:13 pm)

like it's not just a set of Nippondenso injectors...
  
yep from the sound of this article its a set of really high quality injectors - and a few extra lines in a computer program. Still not convinced that DI doesn't cost a bit of gas though - understanding of course that a IS350 better damn well be geared differently than a 'mere' Avalon. One of these cars can do so much more than the other , can't it?
#6400 of 6844
Re: Taurus vs Azera observations [captain2] by batista
Jun 03, 2008 (4:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Jun 03, 2008 12:36 pm)

I was surprised to see BMW have to resort to turbocharging in the new 335 though, simply to produce the same sort of naturally aspirated power you have in your IS already. Guess that in itself speaks volumes about the techinical superiority of the 2GR
 
The BMW 335i has a 3.0L engine and has 300 lbs/ft of torque 1400 rpm while the Lexus 3.5L has 2774800 rpm.
Plus, the BMW 335i is under-rated with having 300HP after some have found out after taking the car to a dyno where it was rated at 300 RWHP.

Messages Page 640 of 685
1
...
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
...
685
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement