Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Mainstream Large Sedans Comparison
6844 messages, Last post on Mar 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: louiswei (Mar 17, 2008 10:47 am) Would be surprised though, that Lexus would have something like this but that it wouldn't carry thru to ALL Toyota products given Toyota's history with sludging. This kind of 'technology' is cheap once a mfgr. has it. To me it's more a question of whether you should trust it. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: captain2 (Mar 17, 2008 10:58 am) No dealer could get by with avoiding your warranty claim if you followed instructions in your owners manual. You would be following the maintenance intervals you were told to (by the minder). What computer ever gave someone a 15k interval? As far as Lexus having it but keeping it from 'yota, I'd be surprised. Honda has put it in cars all the way down to the lowly Civic since 2006 (other Honda vehicles had it even before that). |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: captain2 (Mar 17, 2008 10:58 am) Sounds a lot better than letting a "silly mechanical mechanism" pop up a 5K indicator. Time to get your oil changes regardless of what kind of oil you put in! It's 5K miles? Hehheeee. I'll take a sensor that integrates the temperature effects and speed and number of starts and other variables.
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Mar 17, 2008 11:17 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: captain2 (Mar 17, 2008 11:19 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Mar 17, 2008 11:25 am) Using synthetic and given the type of driving I do, it is entirely conceivable that I'm not abusing anything by going 10 or 15k between oil changes - if the 'computer' tells me its OK. How would you think I would do explaining this to Toyota - do I win? - or is it simpler for me to just present them with a stack of oil change receipts showing all those changes at 5k intervals? |
|
|
Replying to: alexstore (Mar 17, 2008 9:59 am) didn't say that exactly - even though Edmunds and Intellichoice seem to think so. Said it is very close, and the Avalon isn't necessarily a more expensive car - to own. TCO is a number that is highly dependent on what the actual purchase price of the car is (as well as what the resale value is)- if Edmund's/IC are basing their numbers on MSRP, for example, that would be unfair to the Azera simply because the Azera sells at higher discounts than the Avalon. Tires and other 'consumables' are not likely to effect TCO much, some Avalons come with Michelins that seem to wear better than those trims that come with Bridgestones, besides which, even if the Azera 'ate' tires - it still would only be a few hundred bucks added to a TCO that is in the tens of thousands. The cars that might be doing real well right now (from a TCO perspective) are most likely things like the Impala and the Taurus probably due to some really large initial discounts and despite probably poor resale values. |
|
|
Replying to: captain2 (Mar 17, 2008 8:21 am) As for the TC/ESC, I don't know how much you drive in difficult winter conditions, but slush on top of ice at about 32 degrees, is about as bad as it can get. And, in the mountains you have to go up and downhill, so even at 20 mph or even much less, it can get interesting. Of course, the last time I had even a fender bender was in an Avalon, with its vehicle skid control, etc. When a van loses it, and crosses two lanes of traffic going downhill and is sliding crosswise toward you one car length in front of you, you will find that even the mighty Avalon is screwed, with its Michelins not getting any traction to turn or brake, even at no more than 10-15 mph. Now perhaps my Azera will perform better, but even I doubt it. Given that the two months with the highest snow totals in Colorado are March and April, I expect to see those conditions a few more times this spring. BTW, my other vehicle is an Explorer with studded snows. I believe as of 2007 every Hyundai model had the ESC capability, as standard equipment Unlike some manufacturers, like TOYOTA, which made it available as an extra cost option, speaking of cheap and valuing profit over safety. In fact, I think it is still an option on some Avalon models, isn't it??? I thought perhaps companies like Hyundai would shame them into making it a standard feature for 2008,but I guess not. Yep, still an option on a "cheap" Avalon. Guess some TOY fans will have to wait for the government to make safety a priorityfor its customers.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jaymagic (Mar 17, 2008 2:43 pm) If you're going to speak of one, you must speak of the other. The Hyundai Accent doesn't offer ESC, and the Elantra makes you get the top-of-the-line model in order to get it. You are awfully quick to sarcastically badmouth Toyota yet praise Hyundai when they both do the same thing with some vehicles in their lineup, even though Hyundai has it standard on some trims, it doesn't offer it on the "cheap" ones. Back on topic though, all Hyundai vehicles RELEVANT to this discussion have ESC standard, which, at this price level and size of car, should already be the case with all manufacturers I feel.
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Mar 17, 2008 3:55 pm)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Mainstream Large Sedans Comparison
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Buick Lucerne
2010 Chevrolet Impala
2011 Dodge Charger
2010 Ford Taurus
2010 Hyundai Azera
2010 Toyota Avalon
2010 Nissan Maxima
2009 Pontiac G8
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
