Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Mainstream Large Sedans Comparison
6844 messages, Last post on Mar 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: allmet33 (Feb 21, 2008 9:14 am) Looks like someone needs to catchup on his reading skills... Usually I don't throw stones while in a glass house, it's always some dang annoying kids who throws stones at my glass house. 
|
|
|
Replying to: louiswei (Feb 21, 2008 10:03 am) You said that the CTS was too small for the Impala to be based on it's platform. Why, oh why great and wonderful Louis...can you PLEASE explain why the future Impala (if it were to go RWD) can't be based on the current CTS platform???
|
|
|
Replying to: allmet33 (Feb 21, 2008 10:13 am) 1. The RWD Impala can't be based on the CTS platform or 2. The RWD Impala can't be based on the CTS but can share platform Was it option 1 or option 2? Seriously, please stop putting words in my mouth. The "CTS platform" is only one version of GM's Sigma platform, current vehicles based on this platforms are: STS, SRX and CTS. So since the Impala is a fullsize sedan it can't be based on the "CTS platform" but can share the Sigma platform with the CTS. Is it clear for you now?
|
|
|
Replying to: louiswei (Feb 21, 2008 10:44 am) Okay...let's see if we can't make sense of this. If the CTS platform exists first and it's a tad bit too small for the Impala to use as is. Then...if it were re-worked to fit the Impala, wouldn't that be an Impala "BASED" on the CTS platform? In your own words, you basically said (when I first posted about it) that the CTS platform wouldn't work because it was too small (I dare you to go back and check that out...you DID say that). Well...with the current CTS platform having just really changed...I doubt if it would change again by the time the RWD Impala would be brought out (if it even goes RWD). Now...if they changed the CTS platform and made it bigger and it would fit the Impala, THEN...they would be SHARING platforms. So...based on your own words, they couldn't share platforms based on what I orginally said about the FUTURE RWD Impala being based on the CURRENT CTS platform. What was that you said about reading? 
|
|
| The current Camry and Avalon rides on an updated platform. It is not considered new, despite some reports claim otherwise. | |
A reporter seeks to interview owners of cars with more than 100,000 miles on their odometers. Please respond to jfallon edmunds.com today, February 21, 2008, with your daytime contact information and a few sentences about your vehicle.
|
|
|
Replying to: allmet33 (Feb 21, 2008 11:22 am) Once again, I've said that the RWD Impala can share platform with the CTS but it can't be based on CTS or CTS platform because it is just too small. The reality is, the CTS platform is too small for a RWD Impala but both can share the Sigma platform. A CTS platform is dedicated for CTS, SRX platform is dedicated for SRX and STS platform is dedicated for STS but all 3 use the Sigma platform architecture. Do you understand now or not? So...based on your own words, they couldn't share platforms based on what I orginally said about the FUTURE RWD Impala being based on the CURRENT CTS platform. Where did I say they couldn't share platforms? Again, evidences please. I want to see the exact statement which I said that the RWD Impala and CTS couldn't share platforms. If you can't provide those then what you are doing is to put YOUR words in my mouth.
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Feb 21, 2008 8:37 am) I stand by my comment. And yes the 07 Camry is instead a shortened 05+ Avalon, quite the opposite what it used to be and they do share some components , mainly in the powertrain. This is largely semantics, but if you are going to tell me that the 05+ Avalon is 'based' on ANYTHING else, then it should and would have at least some parts commonality with whatever that was - which it didn't at the time.
|
|
|
Replying to: louiswei (Feb 21, 2008 11:49 am)  You're right...you didn't say the CTS platform was too small before, however...you JUST said it in your most recent post. However, I do apologize for saying you said it previously...it was El Captain that intially said it. Once again, I've said that the RWD Impala can share platform with the CTS but it can't be based on CTS or CTS platform because it is just too small. I'm not arguing that certain platforms may be dedicated to certain models. However...why can't GM re-work a CTS platform to work with an Impala??? Or is that what you're saying by saying that the various Caddies are based on the similar architecture? Either way...based or shared, is essentially the same thing. In order for it to be based on, it must share something in common, right?
|
|
|
Replying to: allmet33 (Feb 21, 2008 12:17 pm) Sure GM can re-work a CTS platform to fit a RWD Impala but that doesn't mean the Impala is based on CTS, it just meant that the two are platform mates. ES is "based on" Camry G8 is "based on" commodore Sierra is "based on" Silverado Is the Azera based on Sonata since it is built on a stretched Sonata platform? If your answer is yes then I rest my case because that just means your definition for "based on" is different than mine.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Mainstream Large Sedans Comparison
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Buick Lucerne
2010 Chevrolet Impala
2011 Dodge Charger
2010 Ford Taurus
2010 Hyundai Azera
2010 Toyota Avalon
2010 Nissan Maxima
2009 Pontiac G8
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
