Sign In Join 



Mainstream Large Sedans Comparison

6844 messages,  Last post on Mar 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Buick Lucerne, Chevrolet Impala, Dodge Charger, Ford Taurus, Hyundai Azera, Toyota Avalon, Nissan Maxima, Pontiac G8, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 355 of 685
1
...
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
...
685
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3541 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [xtec] by allmet33
Nov 06, 2007 (1:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xtec (Nov 06, 2007 1:07 pm)

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...why would you compare a V-8 equipped Charger with a V-6 equipped Azera??? Oh yeah, that's right, that's the only way American cars can keep up with the imports! LMAO
 
No my friend, YOU are doing apples to oranges.
 
You don't use the MSRP as your starting point, you take two vehicles and equip them as equally as you can. Which is exactly what I did. A fully loaded Charger R/T will cost WAY more than a fully loaded Azera Limited (ultimate package).
 
Like I said before, I don't know what the price of the Charger SE equipped as I showed went for in 2006, so I can't honestly say which has the better value. If I'm not mistaken, it would have run about $25K to get a Charger like that, in which case...the value between the two is pretty darn close. Maybe I should have said the Charger SE with the SXT package, I guess you didn't look at the options that were listed in the comparison. Being a Charger owner, I was assuming you would have known that.
 
Go back to your apples and oranges pick with the Charger R/T vs. the Azera...that's a joke!!! The BASE 2007 model R/T starts out with an MSRP of just over $30K. Not to mention to get an R/T with some of the same features as the Azera...you're talking an MSRP of $35K (that's not even fully loaded). The fully loaded 2007 Azera Limited w/XM shows and MSRP of just over $27K. With all the options, the MSRP on the Azera is just over $31K How on earth do you try to compare the two???
 
The 2007 Charger SE with the SXT package (which equips the Charger very similarly to the Azera Limited w/Premium Package) as I stated in my initial post, comes to just under $26K. So why is it apples and oranges when comparing the two???
 
Whatever it is you're smoking over there...take it back and get a refund because it's a bad batch!!!
 
I'm sorry if you're feelings are hurt to find out that there's no big difference in resale value between the Azera and the Charger (when equally equipped). LOL You tried hard though, I'll give you a C+ for your valiant effort.
#3542 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [allmet33] by xtec
Nov 06, 2007 (3:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: allmet33 (Nov 06, 2007 1:24 pm)

My Charger SXT is equal to the Azera SE ,and close on msrp.Like I said before,with same options as my Charger,the Azera SE was $22000 and my SXT was $24665.The Charger SE started at 19999 in 06.It has half the options your Azera Limited does.How can you call that Apples to Apples.I proved my point and don't need to go farther.I'm sorry if you can't accept it.
#3543 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [xtec] by vic10
Nov 06, 2007 (6:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xtec (Nov 06, 2007 3:17 pm)

You left out the most important part: No matter what the difference in price or resale value, if you bought an Azera, at the end of the day you're stuck with...an Azera. That alone should be enough reason to buy the Charger, n'est-ce pas??
 
Although the prices may be similar, the markets they appeal to are completely different. You might as well be comparing fishing poles to baseball bats (or whatever other weird comparison you wish to choose). Nice to be able to have that choice in the same price range, though, don't you think?
#3544 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [vic10] by joe97
Nov 06, 2007 (6:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: vic10 (Nov 06, 2007 6:00 pm)

You left out the most important part: No matter what the difference in price or resale value, if you bought an Azera, at the end of the day you're stuck with...an Azera. That alone should be enough reason to buy the Charger, n'est-ce pas??
 
Worst logic. ever.
#3545 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [xtec] by allmet33
Nov 06, 2007 (6:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xtec (Nov 06, 2007 3:17 pm)

Again, I don't know what options list you're looking at...unless you're trying to say you bought a bare-bones Charger SXT. The '06 Azera SE was the base model version until '07 when the GLS was introduced.
 
You've proven MY point as well. The Charger SE started around $20K and when you get done adding all the options to make it comparable to the Azera Limited w/premium package...it is closer to the price of that rather than the Azera SE. You just choose to go with the SE instead to TRY and validate your point.
 
Your SXT at $24,665 is much closer to my Azera Limited at $26,081. So, once again...in comarison...you lose out on which car is a greater value. You're also reaching by trying to compare the Charger SE to the Azera Limited when it comes to options.
 
If you go back and look at the comparo I posted, I used the Charger SE, but...with the SXT package which made the two cars equally packaged. I'm sorry if YOU don't want to accept the truth in the matter that that Azera and the Charger are pretty equal in resale value at this point.
 
In conclusion, you have YET to prove your point other than trying every way possible to sell the idea that your Charger SXT is superior in value to an Azera SE or Limited. It's not that I can't accept your logic, it's just you haven't shown any with the route you're taking to make the comparison. First you want to compare a Charger R/T to an Azera Limited, then you turn around and try to compare your SXT to the Azera SE!!!
 
You can't compare the Charger SXT to the Azera SE. You can compare the Charger SE to the Azera SE, but...once again, you'll see the the Azera will show and prove to be a better value. I've already shown a perfect situation with both cars being pretty much equal in listed equipment, condition and with the exact same mileage. The numbers speak for themselves. Now tell me what point you've proven!
 
I'm sorry, unless you have a Charger R/T...the rest just suck! It's akin to buying a Ferrari with a 4 banger AND an automatic (okay, maybe a V-6)in it! In the end, your Charger can't even keep up with an Azera...how's that for insult to injury?
#3546 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [vic10] by keitha3
Nov 06, 2007 (7:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: vic10 (Nov 06, 2007 6:00 pm)

My answer to your question is a huge, "No!!!!!"
 
I've test driven both and much prefer the Azera, especially if they get their suspension problems cleaned up.
 
Honestly, the Charger had a nervous feel to its handling which I didn't like. But, each of us obviously can make our own decisions, right?
 
By the way, I wouldn't consider myself "stuck" with an Azera should I purchase one. I'd be proud of my decision to spend my money wisely.
#3547 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [allmet33] by cobrazera
Nov 07, 2007 (3:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: allmet33 (Nov 06, 2007 6:27 pm)

I did a comp on the Dodge Charger R/T and found that equally equipped as an Azera Limited w/Ultimate the Charger lists for about $34.2K, and found that a 2006 model with 30K miles ( excellent condition ) has a trade-in value of $20.6K: cost to own was $13.6K.
The Azera lists for $29.8K and had a used value of $16.3K: cost to own was $13.5K.
Looks like they cost about the same to own for 2 years.
#3548 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [cobrazera] by cobrazera
Nov 07, 2007 (3:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: cobrazera (Nov 07, 2007 3:02 am)

Continueing my previous post, #3547, both the Charger and Azera can probably be bought at a $2500 discount pretty easily, so the cost would be about $11K for each.
I then compared these to an Avalon XLS ( closest in equipment ) and found a new price of about $32.2K and a trade-in value of $21.2K, cost to own: $11K.
#3549 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [cobrazera] by allmet33
Nov 07, 2007 (5:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: cobrazera (Nov 07, 2007 3:02 am)

Once again, they two are NOT equally equipped as the R/T has a V-8 and the Azera has only a V-6. That is why I used the Charger SE w/SXT Package vs. Azera Limited w/Premium Package. The equipment list is pretty much dead even and there is only a couple thousand difference in the price. A much better comparison to use.
 
However, thank you for proving my point that the Charger and Azera are pretty much the same value. There are some that just refuse to believe that their precious American-made Charger can even be compared to the likes of a Korean-made product! LOL
 
Like I said before when I bought my '02 Sonata, the rest of the car makers need to keep an eye over their shoulder because Hyundai is creeping up on them.
#3550 of 6844
Re: 2006 Azera Limited vs. 2006 Charger SE [allmet33] by alexstore
Nov 07, 2007 (7:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: allmet33 (Nov 07, 2007 5:50 am)

Toyota syndrome is now present in Hyundai. Recently visited HUyndai dealership in search for an SUV and had a chance to look at velacruz. Is this a top of the line Huyndai SUV? I have a better chance at buying used MUrano then this vehicle . Also looked once again at azera. Currently top of the line Azera without any options does not match even basic Avalon in its status.

Messages Page 355 of 685
1
...
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
...
685
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement