Sign In Join 



Edmunds turns 40 - guess the most significant car from each year!

349 messages,  Last post on Feb 27, 2007 at 5:26 AM

You are in the Inside Line Article Comments Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires


Edmunds Most Significant Vehicles, 1966-2006


Messages Page 34 of 36
1
...
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#323 of 349
Re: 1999's pick jogged my memory. [xwesx] by fintail
Oct 21, 2006 (11:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: xwesx (Oct 20, 2006 1:17 pm)

Is an Outback really a crossover, or just a jacked up wagon? I've always considered it the latter...
#324 of 349
Re: 1999's pick jogged my memory. [fintail] by british_rover
Oct 21, 2006 (11:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Oct 21, 2006 11:53 am)

Yeah I wouldn't call it a crossover.
 
The RX was the first vehicle that showed a luxury crossover could be profitable. Previous crossovers, RAV-4 and CR-V, were not luxrious.
#325 of 349
Re: 1999's pick jogged my memory. [british_rover] by boomchek
Oct 21, 2006 (12:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Oct 21, 2006 11:57 am)

I think the RX was MotorTrend's car/truck of the year for 1997 too.
#326 of 349
Re: 1999's pick jogged my memory. [british_rover] by kyfdx HOST
Oct 21, 2006 (12:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Oct 21, 2006 11:57 am)

How can the '99 RX be significant, when the winner for 1998 was the Mercedes ML, which supposedly started the luxury SUV craze?
 
Geez... One of them could be significant, but not both..
#327 of 349
Re: 1999's pick jogged my memory. [kyfdx] by fintail
Oct 21, 2006 (1:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kyfdx (Oct 21, 2006 12:26 pm)

I think because the RX is a Camry SUV, and the ML is traditional SUV. They are really graspin at straws, or those years were meaningless.
#328 of 349
Re: 1999's pick jogged my memory. [fintail] by british_rover
Oct 21, 2006 (4:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Oct 21, 2006 1:44 pm)

Yeah the ML back in 1998 was a completly traditional SUV with body on frame chassis and low range. The early versions of that design weren't so great but the later ones were actually pretty good.
 
The new one is junk though.
#329 of 349
Well... by lemko
Oct 23, 2006 (9:25 am)
Reply
...the AMC Eagle could be considered a cross-over so the idea is older then the Lexus or Subaru.
#330 of 349
Re: Well... [lemko] by fintail
Oct 23, 2006 (9:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Oct 23, 2006 9:25 am)

I think the Eagle was a jacked up wagon too...not a SUV on a car platform. It was the real predecessor to the Outback.
#331 of 349
2002? by alpha1517
Oct 23, 2006 (10:11 am)
Reply
I know it's jumping ahead, but I think 2002 would have to be the redesigned Nissan Altima... It put Nissan back on the map in competing with Honda & Toyota. Everywhere you looked was a new Altima. The 2.5L could crank out 180hp, which is impressive for a 4 cylinder; and the 3.5L V6 put out at least 220, if I remember correctly...
#332 of 349
Re: 2002? [alpha1517] by british_rover
Oct 23, 2006 (6:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: alpha1517 (Oct 23, 2006 10:11 am)

I think the MINI has to be the car for 2002. Kind of the car that started breaking the SUV trend.

Messages Page 34 of 36
1
...
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement