Sign In Join 

Edmunds turns 40 - guess the most significant car from each year!

349 messages,  Last post on Feb 27, 2007 at 6:26 AM

You are in the Inside Line Article Comments Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires


Edmunds Most Significant Vehicles, 1966-2006


Messages Page 28 of 36
1
...
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
...
36
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#266 of 349
Re: . [british_rover] by fintail
Sep 29, 2006 (4:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Sep 29, 2006 2:52 pm)

I suppose that's the difference, yeah. IIRC RX was a model year 1999 vehicle anyway. I can't think of a Lexus other than the LS either...and it certainly gets nothing for its copycat styling.
 
I don't know about the Mercedes minivan....MB does have a full line of vans in Europe of course, but we see nothing aside from the deluxe-Pacifica styled R class and the non-MB badged Sprinter.
 
Here's a Euro MB van...not so mini I guess
 
#267 of 349
Re: . [fintail] by xwesx
Sep 29, 2006 (4:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Sep 29, 2006 4:03 pm)

Oh, yep, that is what it was... an R-class. It was a quick look as I was turning left at the same intersection it was turning right (and going the opposite direction). Thanks!
 
I like the looks of it... I could go for an R63.... if it were about $50,000 cheaper!
#268 of 349
Re: . [fintail] by british_rover
Sep 29, 2006 (4:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Sep 29, 2006 4:03 pm)

I actually saw a Sprinter van with a Merc Three pointed star badge a couple of weeks ago when I was delivering that Range Rover to the customer in New York.
#269 of 349
Re: . [british_rover] by fintail
Sep 29, 2006 (6:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Sep 29, 2006 4:15 pm)

R63 could be interesting for the AMG loving family man.
 
I have seen a Sprinter with a MB badge too, being used as an errand runner by the local MB franchise. I am sure the MB grille is an easy switch. If I had one I might do the same...technically, it is a Mercedes!
 
With 1990 being more or less a shoe-in...how about 1991?
#270 of 349
Re: . [fintail] by 210delray
Sep 29, 2006 (7:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Sep 29, 2006 6:47 pm)

Oh, that's easy for 1991 - the Explorer is a shoe-in, the sad portent of SUV-o-mania, and of course, the "Exploder" phenomenon that mortally wounded Ford in 2000.
 
And I've finally made up my mind, agreeing with the rest of you that the Lexus LS is more significant than the Miata for 1990.
 
Now for 1992, does anyone think the Camry will get it again, since that generation was considered the "gold standard" by so many? OTOH, it didn't become the best-selling car until the generation after this one.
#271 of 349
Re: . [210delray] by fintail
Sep 29, 2006 (8:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 210delray (Sep 29, 2006 7:38 pm)

Ah the Exploder, how senile of me. 1991 is done.
 
So on to 92....big newbies were Camry, BMW 3er, MB W140, Lexus ES, Seville and Eldo, Prelude, Suburban and friends...and I am sure some others
#272 of 349
Dodge Viper? by skierx420
Sep 30, 2006 (9:05 am)
Reply
I am suprised that no one has considered the Dodge Viper. The Viper is the reason Dodge was able to change its whole direction from the K car era to what we think of now as powerful cars with high horsepower. I understand that there used to be that image from the 60's and the 70's but the Viper reignited the passion for some. Not to mention it was the first domestic competitor to the Corvette in years, and better for a while.
#273 of 349
Re: . [fintail] by british_rover
Sep 30, 2006 (1:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Sep 29, 2006 6:47 pm)

After driving a regular R500 I don't think anyone, not even AMG, could make that into a pleasent driving experience.
#274 of 349
... by plekto
Sep 30, 2006 (1:16 pm)
Reply
Except that one-hit wonders don't change the public anymore.
 
We've grown smarter and more savvy, thanks, I think, to the InterNet. The old 60-something executives can't imagine a world where their marketing tricks that used to work now suddenly don't.
 
As for 1990 - no clue.
#275 of 349
1990 by maxhonda99
Oct 03, 2006 (8:44 pm)
Reply
1990 should have definately gone to the Lexus LS400. That was a ridiculously significant car in the automotive world that year, as it caused other luxury makers to rethink how they made & sold luxury cars. It caused Mercedes to become less stubborn, to cut costs and prices. As well as the Lexus LS400 caused other luxury carmakers to to wake up also. Such as after the LS400, Cadillac finally started to get serious about building a world class Seville(even though it took them still another half decade to build one). Also, since 1990 the luxury car market has literally exploded! I doubt the luxury market would be this big without Lexus, since Mercedes would probably still have a stick up it's you know what.

Messages Page 28 of 36
1
...
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
...
36
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?
Connect with Facebook Sign In Using Your Facebook AccountNew!

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement